Harden wasn't Harden in college either, otherwise he would have been the 1st or 2nd pick (after Curry). Michael Jordan wasn't Michael Jordan in college as well. People don't max out in college...although I have a hard time believing Zion is gonna be dominating everyone in the NBA as he was in college.
Well yeah but I still just don’t see the comparison really. He’s a poor defender and an inefficient scorer. It’s hard for me to see him taking over games like James Harden. Last Duke player hyped up to be the next Harden was Justise Winslow and he is a role player at best four years later.
The problem is that inherently everyone wants to compare a prospect to a current player and it just never really pans out that way.
I didn’t see much of Morant but Zion is considerably better than Barrett. I honestly am just as skittish on Barrett as I am Cam Reddish.
I don’t think it’s unfair to say this is a weak draft on the surface even if Barrett does live up to the hype.
That said there’s no tangible way to measure potential. I can only go off what I saw watching RJ play all year. He reminded me of Derozan if anyone like I said. Can’t shoot from deep, poor defender, poor ft shooter, turnover machine, gets tunnel vision etc. When Zion went down Duke looked awful.
The only bonafide superstar on Duke I saw was Zion.
I think Barrett will be a 20 ppg guy that makes a lot of money but I’d personally be surprised if he was a superstar. So in other words.. a Derozan
Just my two cents. Time will tell. I just find comparisons in general to be a frivolous exercise.
I’m not even 100 percent certain on anyone to be brutally honest. This is a tricky draft. Past Zion I think a lot of picks are just hoping the potential comes to fruition. Morant included.