If you're asking just one reason, I'll point at the obvious one :- "Their Returning games suck"Seriously now
Thiem out, zverev barely wins in 5 sets
They are p*thetic
Whats the reason for this?
My theory is that the 30+ year olds who continue to dominate the game are the last group of players who learned the game before polys and nuclear rackets took over the sport.
Seriously now
Thiem out, zverev barely wins in 5 sets
They are p*thetic
Whats the reason for this?
Or maybe this generation has realized what we sort of knew all along - tennis is a boring sport with most pros not even breaking even on expenses.
Polys and stiff rackets are the only reason Nadal is dominant, so I don't know what you are talking about.
More and more, I'm buying into the theory that brains have literally been de-wired by perpetual immersion in social media and tech from an early age.
The idea is that this generation simply doesn't have the fundamental focus and drive to reach the very highest levels.
More and more, I'm buying into the theory that brains have literally been de-wired by perpetual immersion in social media and tech from an early age.
The idea is that this generation simply doesn't have the fundamental focus and drive to reach the very highest levels.
First gen since the wood era not to have a tech advantage?
Slowing the courts keeps the old guys in it, but you would think the young-gen's higher stamina would offset that.
Soccer's not an individual sport.Then the young generation would be terrible at other sports too, and while I think there is a general aging across sports, there are young superstars in other sports, such as Kylian Mbappe.
Football.*Soccer's not an individual sport.
Tennis requires a level of independent thought that I'm afraid has gotten lost.
However, you'll get zero argument from me on the matter of the greatest athletic talents choosing other sports. Tennis doesn't get the cream of the crop.
the vast majority of pros would play with racquets <65 stiffness, so I don't know if that's holding any waterPolys and stiff rackets are the only reason Nadal is dominant, so I don't know what you are talking about.
That's just it. However you tackle this mystery, nothing makes sense.Slowing the courts keeps the old guys in it, but you would think the young-gen's higher stamina would offset that.
Whats wrong with young generation?
First gen since the wood era not to have a tech advantage?
This is becoming a monthly thread
Aren't the Babolats all higher than 65? How stiff was Sampras racket?the vast majority of pros would play with racquets <65 stiffness, so I don't know if that's holding any water
But why are other sports not having the same issues? Or are they?More and more, I'm buying into the theory that brains have literally been de-wired by perpetual immersion in social media and tech from an early age.
The idea is that this generation simply doesn't have the fundamental focus and drive to reach the very highest levels.
Why pull in Djokovic here? He can only play the person across the net. I have never believed in weak-strong eras. Over a 15-20 year career one would think that these would balance out.This is Djokovic's strong competition. Super strong era isn't it?
My theory is that the 30+ year olds who continue to dominate the game are the last group of players who learned the game before polys and nuclear rackets took over the sport.
Modern instruction methods and a general unwillingness to deviate from the norm has something to do with it too. As mentioned before by other posters the ATP is becoming like the WTA. With such little variation in technique, playing styles and strategy no wonder the margins are narrower and narrower. Every variable is kept almost the same with the exception of natural talent, which can be easily overshadowed by mood and physical condition on a bad day.
This is in my opinion why the younger gen constantly get into five setters even in earlier rounds and end up getting burnt out within slams and over the year--they are first of all stubborn and insist upon playing a slightly better version of the same game than their opponents', and are too short-sighted to tinker with their games so they have an easier time against everyone in general to reduce the mileage.
Rog and Ralph both have stand out shots and an arsenal which give them a greater edge over others.
Yeah its unlikely it has to do with focus or smartphones, there are lot of other sports that hasnt the same problem.Then the young generation would be terrible at other sports too, and while I think there is a general aging across sports, there are young superstars in other sports, such as Kylian Mbappe.
There has been barely any advancement in nutrition and sports medicine the last 10-15 years! I find it hard to believe Usain Bolt would have been at a disadvantage back in 2008 because of lack of knowledge in nutrition and sports medicine, compared to today? What about the likes of Ian Thorpe and Michael Phelps? Don't think the swimmers of today would have much more 'knowledge' in the field compared to back then. I studied sports nutrition back in 2000, and I can tell you that there hasn't been that much of a difference back then to what we know now.That's probably part of it, but the advances in nutrition and medicine keeping guys healthier longer is also part of it.
When the old guys came of age, serve and volleying and having an all court game were also more of a thing than they are today.
Maybe I'm a bad a person, but I usually look forward to checking the forums whenever I Google the scores at work and see most of the young guys out in the first 3 rounds.This is becoming a monthly thread
Hey I'm just fighting fire with fire If Djokovic fans are going to continue to label 03-07 as a weak era. Djokovic is the youngest of all the dinosaurs on tour, so he is by far getting the maximum benefit.Why pull in Djokovic here? He can only play the person across the net. I have never believed in weak-strong eras. Over a 15-20 year career one would think that these would balance out.
stock ones are - a pro can have a pure drive below 60RA if they want to. Fabio's is a pure drive with 64 RA (actually an old bab model soft drive)Aren't the Babolats all higher than 65? How stiff was Sampras racket?
funnyHey I'm just fighting fire with fire If Djokovic fans are going to continue to label 03-07 as a weak era. Djokovic is the youngest of all the dinosaurs on tour, so he is by far getting the maximum benefit.
1) I think the stamina factor in tennis is overrated. Even in the longest 5 set matches they run around 3000 meters or so, and that’s over 4-5 hours with 25 seconds breaks after every point. It’s just not that exhausting, so stamina cannot really compensate much worse technical skills. For comparison, football players run 10-12 km in 90 minutesFirst gen since the wood era not to have a tech advantage?
Slowing the courts keeps the old guys in it, but you would think the young-gen's higher stamina would offset that.
1) I think the stamina factor in tennis is overrated. Even in the longest 5 set matches they run around 3000 meters or so, and that’s over 4-5 hours with 25 seconds breaks after every point. It’s just not that exhausting, so stamina cannot really compensate much worse technical skills. For comparison, football players run 10-12 km in 90 minutes
My own experience confirms this. I mostly play Best of 5 with a friend, and long rallyes with many sprints for dropshots etc. are typical for our matches. Still I have no problem to play 5 sets in the heat. However, when I play football (especially indoor football) I’m exhausted after 10 minutes of intensive play.
2) In many endurance sports many of the best competitors are over 30 anyway. The early decline is overrated by some people as well.
3) If you look at those young players in long matches, they visibly don’t have more stamina than the "older" ones. For example look at Tsitsipas against Wawrinka at RG.
As you hinted at, the equipment factor (no major change in technology in the last 15-20 years) is decisive in my opinion as well.
The older guys have better drugs!Seriously now
Thiem out, zverev barely wins in 5 sets
They are p*thetic
Whats the reason for this?
The older guys have better drugs!