Why last 7 years my dear. Has tennis been played only for the last 7 years?What's his record against Federer and Djokovic outside of clay in the last 7 years again?
Why last 7 years my dear. Has tennis been played only for the last 7 years?What's his record against Federer and Djokovic outside of clay in the last 7 years again?
You think Nadal being humiliated by his biggest rivals on 2 surfaces for nearly 7 years is nothing?Why last 7 years my dear. Has tennis been played only for the last 7 years?
There is over a million people, two of my colleagues included, who would love to agree with you that covid is not a big deal at all, but they can't anymore... Take your conspiracy theories elsewhere.Sounds like a typical covoodoodian argument. Who cares that millions have no symptoms when you have one guy who died, let's lock the entire world.
How many times Nadal had cakewalks compared to how many tough semis? Tell me.
Fed who couldn't serve too and on a surface that was so slow it's a joke to call it a HC.
Yeah, all opportunistic wins.
And? If anything, him still being butthurt about Nadal winning 4 USO titles is very satisfying. USO 2019 was one of Nadal's best slam titles and I would not trade it for anything else. Starting from the fourth round he had drama in every match, especially in the final.Maybe specifically USO 2019 for RG 2009. Other than the final, that one was a bit of a stinker and the likes of tennis_pro won't ever shut up about it.
All the other non-RG slams involve great wins against top players. I wouldn't want to give up any of those.
Then again, I would feel bad about stealing from Soderling his big moment of glory. He's been unlucky enough.
You are essentially arguing with a potato. Don’t botherThere is over a million people, two of my colleagues included, who would love to agree with you that covid is not a big deal at all, but they can't anymore... Take your conspiracy theories elsewhere.
You find some Youzhny/Federer like contrasts at the first three Slams and tell me. But since even Federer and Djokovic are part of "embarrassing cakewalks" while Baghdatis and Philippoussis I imagine are not, what's the point of listing anything?
I know you are trying to make excuses but it's really not a good look for Fed at all if he really underperformed that many times. "He couldn't serve..." Long term mono effect? Let's wait for his supporters to rate his performance highly so his opponent just might get some credit for beating him. Sounds like a sensible idea.
LMAO is the reaction to your comments. Right, Federer TOTALLY owned Nadal in 2014 by losing their only match that year.You think Nadal being humiliated by his biggest rivals on 2 surfaces for nearly 7 years is nothing?
LMAO
Federer’s main rival in the first roundUSO 2019 was a pretty tough non-big 3 opponent draw.
Med, Cilic in the 4th round, Schwartzman.
The early rounds Chung and Millman. Chung faced Fed in the SF of the AO and can barely beat Millman. Berretini isint great but he’s not that bad.
yeah all the wins against a 35-38 year old Federer. Unfortunately Federer couldn't take advantage of Nadal being 9 years old.Slams won against other Big 3 :
Rafa : 14 Slams
Nole : 13 Slams
Federer : 7 Slams.
Who's the vulture now ?
It's way more than one million, bro.There is over a million people, two of my colleagues included, who would love to agree with you that covid is not a big deal at all, but they can't anymore... Take your conspiracy theories elsewhere.
Yes definitely Baghhdatis who beat 3 top 10 players en route to the final where he was a point away from being a set and a double break up against Federer himself. Who did Berrettini beat again? Old Monfils?You find some Youzhny/Federer like contrasts at the first three Slams and tell me. But since even Federer and Djokovic are part of "embarrassing cakewalks" while Baghdatis and Philippoussis I imagine are not, what's the point of listing anything?
A more sensible idea would be Nadal being able to win more than 9 games against players who Federer smoked in the final when Federer was at his peak.I know you are trying to make excuses but it's really not a good look for Fed at all if he really underperformed that many times. "He couldn't serve..." Long term mono effect? Let's wait for his supporters to rate his performance highly so his opponent just might get some credit for beating him. Sounds like a sensible idea.
I didn't know Federer was 35-38 years old during 2005-2014 .yeah all the wins against a 35-38 year old Federer. Unfortunately Federer couldn't take advantage of Nadal being 9 years old.
Rafa has beaten 35-38 Fed only once. Rest he won against a prime Fed except AO 2014 and a good Djokovicyeah all the wins against a 35-38 year old Federer. Unfortunately Federer couldn't take advantage of Nadal being 9 years old.
As a fan, I would trade one of Nadal's non-clay slams for RG 2009, but preferably one of his Wimbledon or US Open titles. 10 French Opens in a row is too impressive an achievement/record to pass up. Dominance like that is just far more impressive than a little more versatility. I think all the talk of surface versatility ignores the other side of the equation. Nadal is special because he's done something nobody else is even close to doing. Federer/Djokovic are impressive also, but they're improving on what others have done before. Co-domination on Hard/Grass isn't a new concept, it's been done before and others will continue to do so in the future. All this to say, Nadal lacks in surface versatility when compared to Fed/Djok, sure, but they also lack what Nadal has.
Do you agree?
Given how nadal is playing he is probably losing his mind and he has forgotten maths as well. He thinks Nadal has been dominated by Federer for 7 yearswas
I didn't know Federer was 35-38 years old during 2006-2014 .
You shouldn't. But you won't be in such an arrogant mocking mood should the problem come knocking on your door or of someone close to you.It's way more than one million, bro.
And I should care about your two friends because?
Yes definitely Baghhdatis who beat 3 top 10 players en route to the final where he was a point away from being a set and a double break up against Federer himself. Who did Berrettini beat again? Old Monfils?
A more sensible idea would be Nadal being able to win more than 9 games against players who Federer smoked in the final when Federer was at his peak.
What's his record against Federer and Djokovic outside of clay in the last 7 years again? I'm actually generous here.
Nadal can only win s**t outside of clay when he has a draw full with Berrettinis.
If I got one dime each time I heard "just wait till it happens to you" since MarchYou shouldn't. But you won't be in such an arrogant mocking mood should the problem come knocking on your door or of someone close to you.
How many wins for Nadal after November 2013 again?The record is 6-4 to Roger outside clay since 2013.
From 05 to March 09 Murray was 6-2 H2H against Federer. And?How many wins for Nadal after November 2013 again?
It's way more than one million, bro.
And I should care about your two friends because?
Yes definitely Baghhdatis who beat 3 top 10 players en route to the final where he was a point away from being a set and a double break up against Federer himself. Who did Berrettini beat again? Old Monfils?
A more sensible idea would be Nadal being able to win more than 9 games against players who Federer smoked in the final when Federer was at his peak.
Just wait till it happens to Berrettini.If I got one dime each time I heard "just wait till it happens to you" since March
duuuude
I'm not gonna sit at home all day just because there are 0,03% odds that something could happen.
Just came back from my hairdresser, said that 2 days ago her son who's 5 years old swallowed a small metal ball. She rushed to the hospital and had to sign that her son had covid (without doing any tests) which she did because obviously she was in panic mode and her son needed help fast.just wait till it happens to you
while also getting hammered by Fed in the Slams which was everything Fed cared about in 2008-2010From 05 to March 09 Murray was 6-2 H2H against Federer. And?
just came back from my hairdresser, said that 2 days ago her son who's 5 years old swallowed a small metal ball. She had to sign that her son had covid before doing any tests before they helped them in the hospital.
This is an absolute freaking joke.
dude I got more first hand stories, so what?Now you can expose them: with her testimony you and she can literally ruin the lying bas*ards.
I assure you, the newspapers are hungry for such "revelations".
dude I got more first hand stories, so what?
no-one cares, more false positives, locking entire countries and there's nothing you can do
Dude you have no idea what you're talking about. Anyone who doesn't go with the main covid narrative is either ridiculed or crushed like a bug. I know what I know and will just wait this craze out.No, trust me. If you go to a journalist that does investigative journalism, he will gladly take your case, especially supported by evidence. It will be easy to prove it: you have the paperwork and everything. I assume the kid didn't have any test done, so they don't have any documentation for him. Just run to someone like that and you will do everyone a great service.
Here i thought you were some manly man with a flower on your head, but turns out you just got back from your hairdresser. I suppose covid means nothing to manly men going to the hairdresser but I know people that have passed away from complications because they had covid.Just came back from my hairdresser, said that 2 days ago her son who's 5 years old swallowed a small metal ball. She rushed to the hospital and had to sign that her son had covid (without doing any tests) which she did because obviously she was in panic mode and her son needed help fast.
Not a single F shall be given from me.
who doesn't have covid at this point LMAO?Here i thought you were some manly man with a flower on your head, but turns out you just got back from your hairdresser. I suppose covid means nothing to manly men going to the hairdresser but I know people that have passed away from complications because they had covid.
Dude you have no idea what you're talking about. Anyone who doesn't go with the main covid narrative is either ridiculed or crushed like a bug. I know what I know and will just wait this craze out.
Well, either you believe in your cause, or you don't. People that believe in their causes fight for them. People that only talk and fold before they have tried ...
Waiting until "it" crazes out is a kind of suspect. Basically you don't have to prove anything, just talk.
When are you scheduled to travel to Africa with a loaf of bread to feed the starving children again?Well, either you believe in your cause, or you don't. People that believe in their causes fight for them. People that only talk and fold before they have tried ...
Waiting until "it" crazes out is a kind of suspect. Basically you don't have to prove anything, just talk.
Or you're a mighty Internet warrior.
Yeah, all opportunistic wins.
Yep it’s all about the slams. 10-4.while also getting hammered by Fed in the Slams which was everything Fed cared about in 2008-2010
Hewitt, Roddick, 34+ yr old Agassi, exhausted Safin, Philippoussis, Baghdatis, Gonzalez, Kiefer, Bjorkman, Henman, "donuts" Nalbandian
Might like this this thread. Rating all final opponents at slams of the big 3.
Yeah seen that one as well this was more in depth with though and featured a few other discussions thought you might be interested.That thread has pretty much already been done.
I used a conditional. Never implied it is going to happen to you, and never suggested sitting at home all day either. You are all over the place.If I got one dime each time I heard "just wait till it happens to you" since March
duuuude
I'm not gonna sit at home all day just because there are 0,03% odds that something could happen.
I think Nadal would trade you after this.
When are you scheduled to travel to Africa with a loaf of bread to feed the starving children again?
Id trade his 2009 AO for another USO. Legacies and history are made at the 3 oldest Majors.If anything I'd trade his AO, which sounds crazy, but to me that win doesn't tell me anything that his 4 USOs don't already tell me.
I wouldn't trade a W because multiple Channel Slams is very prestigious. Likewise, I think Nadal gets a lot of cred out of 4 USOs. It's pretty much THE stat he can point to when someone attacks his off-clay record.