BGod
G.O.A.T.
Are they even more Slam heavy or does the structure of the tour raise the Masters, WTF & #1 in recognition?
I mean the Grand Prix series in the 80s-90s was nowhere near the consistency. Many top players skipped half of them. And there were a lot of questions with lower tournaments having more Prestige.
You also have the prospect of a 10th Masters on grass. A total 19 weeks of primary season (24-30 is routine in other sports) along with a few for lower tournaments.
Or does the Bo5 format elevate the need for 4+ Slams and of course with Big3 achieving 20+ does 4 Slams even count anymore?
In football, although guys like Marino & Tarleton won 0 titles they had heavy numbers and were from a different era. Now with Brady and other historical precedent you essentially need 2-3 rings along with multiple MVPs. In hockey you need multiple MVPs and Cups but career numbers are harder to match from the past.
So is it going to be something like 20 Masters & 4+ Slams or is it going to be 8+ Slams regardless of Masters?
I mean the Grand Prix series in the 80s-90s was nowhere near the consistency. Many top players skipped half of them. And there were a lot of questions with lower tournaments having more Prestige.
You also have the prospect of a 10th Masters on grass. A total 19 weeks of primary season (24-30 is routine in other sports) along with a few for lower tournaments.
Or does the Bo5 format elevate the need for 4+ Slams and of course with Big3 achieving 20+ does 4 Slams even count anymore?
In football, although guys like Marino & Tarleton won 0 titles they had heavy numbers and were from a different era. Now with Brady and other historical precedent you essentially need 2-3 rings along with multiple MVPs. In hockey you need multiple MVPs and Cups but career numbers are harder to match from the past.
So is it going to be something like 20 Masters & 4+ Slams or is it going to be 8+ Slams regardless of Masters?