Head Youtek IG Prestige MP vs. G360+ Prestige MP/or/ Auxetic Prestige Pro

T

TSTAVRO

New User
I am a long time user of the Head Youtek IG Prestige MP. I am looking for something slightly more forgiving, however I have searched far and wide- nothing compares, and I am back to looking at a new prestige as it may be the most viable option. I am currently waiting for a demo, but would appreciate some input. As the 360+ Prestige MP/ auxetic prestige pro are 98's, I figure this may be a good transition from the old 95's version I have been playing with. If anyone has experience with the IG prestige mp/ 360+ mp and can give me an idea of what has changed as far as feel, and directional control etc. that would be much appreciated!

Thank you in advance!
 
mhkeuns

mhkeuns

Hall of Fame
Though I have not tried the new Prestige Pro, the G360+ Prestige MP is really a nice racket that offers nice feel and superb control. It does feel more forgiving compared to the 95“ Prestige MP’s of the past and does not lack in overall playability - meaning it has the familiar Prestige control. The feel isn’t as soft as the IG, but it feels nice, especially on hard flat shots.
 
Classic-TXP-IG MID

Classic-TXP-IG MID

Hall of Fame
TSTAVRO said:
I am a long time user of the Head Youtek IG Prestige MP. I am looking for something slightly more forgiving, however I have searched far and wide- nothing compares, and I am back to looking at a new prestige as it may be the most viable option. I am currently waiting for a demo, but would appreciate some input. As the 360+ Prestige MP/ auxetic prestige pro are 98's, I figure this may be a good transition from the old 95's version I have been playing with. If anyone has experience with the IG prestige mp/ 360+ mp and can give me an idea of what has changed as far as feel, and directional control etc. that would be much appreciated!

Thank you in advance!
Click to expand...

I would second everything @mhkeuns has said.

I would also add that the IG PMP is softer in a plushness kind of way (closer to the "Classic" Head racquets of old), whereas, the 360+ PMP is soft but slightly more direct/crisp when you hit the ball. What I mean by that is that you can still feel this wonderful soft flex but the ball doesn't feel like it is sinking as much into the strings, and at a point in the shot, feels like the racquet firms up a bit to shoot the ball out a fraction sooner than the IG PMP (we are talking fractions, but still noticeable to me). I enjoy both racquets, both will stay in my collection, and both are great iterations of the Prestige Line.

Both versions are very precise and enable a huge variety of shots and touch, but the 360+ PMP is more forgiving and feels that fraction better in my off-hand (being 20mm, and I also like the TK82S pallet Vs the TK82 - but that can be swapped). Esthetics is a personal thing... I happen to like both, but I don't think the new one looks bad either. The most important thing to me is how they play.

I have not tried the new Auxetic version... I will look to demo it at some point, but I'm not going to rush as I have acquired many new racquets that are fantastic and will be occupying my time for a while, and I have all the old-school Classics that are always an absolute joy to come back to.

Hope that helps.
 
smalahove

smalahove

Hall of Fame
I agree with the others.
That being said, If you want a similar experience to the IG PMP, the Pro Tour 2.0 is your ticket.
The bigger head size on the PMP+ (the new PPro+ is identical) does make a difference in feel, not in a bad way, just that it doesn't feel like the same racket; it feels like a bigger frame.
 
Songs For A Dead Pilot

Songs For A Dead Pilot

Semi-Pro
TSTAVRO said:
I am a long time user of the Head Youtek IG Prestige MP. I am looking for something slightly more forgiving, however I have searched far and wide- nothing compares, and I am back to looking at a new prestige as it may be the most viable option. I am currently waiting for a demo, but would appreciate some input. As the 360+ Prestige MP/ auxetic prestige pro are 98's, I figure this may be a good transition from the old 95's version I have been playing with. If anyone has experience with the IG prestige mp/ 360+ mp and can give me an idea of what has changed as far as feel, and directional control etc. that would be much appreciated!
Thank you in advance!
Click to expand...

I must admit I am in love with TGT293.2 which is a prostock version of IG Prestige MP. So I came back to this frame after some long search for more forgiving racket.
LINK –

After IG Prestige MP I used Liquidmetal Radical MP, IG Radical MP and Pro (16x19 is for sure way easier to use) - and great prostock TGT291.2 – which is IG Prestige S mold dense 16x19. I would say that it was perfect frame inbetween old Prestiges and Radicals. I found it also slightly better from much praised TGT260.2 (Thomas Berdych racket of choice) and 260.3/5 (racket of choice for Diego Schwartzman or Taylor Fritz). The retail edition of 291.2 which are 95" Graphene/XT/Touch Prestige S and Pro (this one is still offered in G360+ and Auxetic line) - are fine rackets to use too – however much stiffer. But I simply like 291 mold.

I do not recommend any of Graphene Radical – but I do like the new G360+ Radical MP and Pro. This is finally something good and new. Good choice for racket easier than 95" Prestige MP.

However I really was disappointed by G360+ Prestige MP. It felt like a dead version of old Prestige Tour and needed extra lead to rise SW.

Head Pro Tour 2.0 is a good racket, but it is even harder to use from IG Prestige MP. Has more power, but feels way heavier. Some people recommend to use non-CAP grommet on it – but the problem is you can't find them easily.

Other than HEAD rackets I do like both Dunlop CX200 Tour's – 16x19 and 18x20. Prince Tour Textreme 95 and Yonex VCore Pro 97HD are also plush and good frames. Both more powerful than IG Prestige MP – Prince has more open drill pattern, Yonex has bigger head size.

If you would like to lower the static weight you keep in your hand – it is worth to try out new Blades v8 (v7 were very comfy, however missed stability and have to high SW for me) and Yonex VCore Pro 2021 (310g). Finally Yonex made them less stiff.
 
Last edited:
Classic-TXP-IG MID

Classic-TXP-IG MID

Hall of Fame
Songs For A Dead Pilot said:
However I really was disappointed by G360+ Prestige MP. It felt like a dead version of old Prestige Tour and needed extra lead to rise SW.
Click to expand...
Songs For A Dead Pilot said:
Yonex VCore Pro 2021 (310g). Finally Yonex made them less stiff.
Click to expand...

Interesting that you found the G360+ PMP dead, I found it very comfortable and slightly "crisper" or more "direct" feeling than the IG PMP. Maybe it was the tension you had it (G360+ PMP) strung at...? I string mine in the Mid/Low 40s (46M/43C - full poly; 46M/46C - Hybrid with poly in Mains; 46M/43 - Hybrid poly in crosses). I like all the other racquets you mentioned, so I was surprised we had a different experience with the G360+ PMP. Shows we are all individual and one size doesn't fit all.

I completely agree with you on the VCPs finally coming down in RA... a welcome change.
 
mhkeuns

mhkeuns

Hall of Fame
I found the G360+ Prestige MP exceptional in control and strung it with 18G poly between 46 to 48lbs. It stood well against heavy hitters and had enough power to fire back. I didn't find it dead, but I could see it feeling that way if it was strung with 16G poly around 50lbs.
 
Songs For A Dead Pilot

Songs For A Dead Pilot

Semi-Pro
I mean the feel of G360+ Prestige MP wasn't bad, but I simply didn't like it. Felt like the worse version of the best Dunlop 200 series. Yep, probably if I would put a nice hybrid with lower tension it would feel better. Also, this racket really needs extra lead tape. For me - buying 320g unstrung frame - to add lead everywhere isn't a great option. I simply preferred retail IG Prestige MP (especially 25th Anniversary Edition) over the new one. I will wait for the version – Auxetic and will try it again.

By the way - any of you tried Head TGT345.1/2 - I guess it is a prostock of the new Prestige mold (or G360+ Prestige in general – not sure about that – maybe @dr325i will help with this one).
 
dr325i

dr325i

G.O.A.T.
Songs For A Dead Pilot said:
I mean the feel of G360+ Prestige MP wasn't bad, but I simply didn't like it. Felt like the worse version of the best Dunlop 200 series. Yep, probably if I would put a nice hybrid with lower tension it would feel better. Also, this racket really needs extra lead tape. For me - buying 320g unstrung frame - to add lead everywhere isn't a great option. I simply preferred retail IG Prestige MP (especially 25th Anniversary Edition) over the new one. I will wait for the version – Auxetic and will try it again.

By the way - any of you tried Head TGT345.1/2 - I guess it is a prostock of the new Prestige mold (or G360+ Prestige in general – not sure about that – maybe @dr325i will help with this one).
Click to expand...
I’ve been playing with the TGt345.2 (360+ Prestige MP 16x19) and love it!
 
T

TSTAVRO

New User
Thank you everyone for the loads of info and good chats. I had a chance to hit with the G360+ PMP and I have to say it ended up being a bit of a let down after getting extensive match play in. Definitely does feel flexible, but does not 'solid up' the same way the IG PMP does. The 98 head did help somewhat, especially on the 2-handed BH, however it didn't really click for me with most other parts of my game. Biggest thing that I was surprised about was I felt like despite the 98 head, it had much less spin potential than the IG PMP. I tried it with a couple different string setups with shaped poly's @ 48 lbs (tour bite soft 16 and confidential 17), and different lead tape setups in the hoop. My go-to is usually a generous amount from 10-2 (don't always weigh it lol). I have never had a problem with spin potential in my IG PMP even strung at low 50's with alu power smooth 16g, however I couldn't find the spin to really bring my kick serves down and jump that I can with the IG. My kick serves are a strength in my game and I couldn't reason to pick up the g360+ when I feel as though it has maybe slightly less control, and give me less spin!.. What a strange combination of cons. Not a bad racquet, but not for me.

On that note, I am back to playing with my IG's for now. However, i'd still like to try some other options. Thoughts on a comparison between the IG PMP and the Dunlop CX Tour 18x20 (weighted-up and un-weighted). Let me know!

Thank you in advance.
 
TennisHound

TennisHound

Legend
TSTAVRO said:
Thank you everyone for the loads of info and good chats. I had a chance to hit with the G360+ PMP and I have to say it ended up being a bit of a let down after getting extensive match play in. Definitely does feel flexible, but does not 'solid up' the same way the IG PMP does. The 98 head did help somewhat, especially on the 2-handed BH, however it didn't really click for me with most other parts of my game. Biggest thing that I was surprised about was I felt like despite the 98 head, it had much less spin potential than the IG PMP. I tried it with a couple different string setups with shaped poly's @ 48 lbs (tour bite soft 16 and confidential 17), and different lead tape setups in the hoop. My go-to is usually a generous amount from 10-2 (don't always weigh it lol). I have never had a problem with spin potential in my IG PMP even strung at low 50's with alu power smooth 16g, however I couldn't find the spin to really bring my kick serves down and jump that I can with the IG. My kick serves are a strength in my game and I couldn't reason to pick up the g360+ when I feel as though it has maybe slightly less control, and give me less spin!.. What a strange combination of cons. Not a bad racquet, but not for me.

On that note, I am back to playing with my IG's for now. However, i'd still like to try some other options. Thoughts on a comparison between the IG PMP and the Dunlop CX Tour 18x20 (weighted-up and un-weighted). Let me know!

Thank you in advance.
Click to expand...
An option may be the CX in 16x19 with a few 2.5 - 3” strips of lead at 12.
 
Last edited:
J-Wildcard

J-Wildcard

Semi-Pro
Interesting reading the thoughts on the is thread echoing my own feelings regarding this comparison. I am in the same boat where I have been trying the last gen 360+ Prestige rackets, I actually tried the Pro first and it felt great to handle, the head size was nice, beam a little wider than I like but not too bad. I tried this with a full bed of poly @54 but it felt slightly stiff which I understand the frame layup is stiffer. I actually felt when I was putting my full power on I was over hitting a little bit with this racket. I have now been hitting with a 360+ Prestige MP and it feels easy regards the swing weight and the handling of the racket. However when serving something is very different in it and when I try a second serve with less pace I am struggling to get the ball in strangely without concentrating more and trying a bit harder? It does feel effortless to rally with and the sweetspot seems to be there for me a lot and makes it easy. My issue is when I put that extra power in for a bigger shot I seem to be struggling to get the power to transfer through from the frame into the ball. It feels a fair bit less overall in the control department which I guess means going tighter on the string tension and maybe looking at other hybrid set ups too?
I haven't tried the newer Auxetic frame yet but am hearing mixed reviews on how much better it is than the older red 360+ MP. Certainly hearing it is slightly stiffer feeling and marginally heavier swingweight wise too. All that being said I am not sure it is worth selling the 360+ MP I already have for a minimal upgrade / difference. I have thought about trying a yonex vcore pro 97hd and a blade v8 18x20 but that's more out of curiosity at this stage. From what I can see the blade 98 V8 looks more similar to the IGMP but with a different specs in that the static weight is moved down and the balance changed too which is usually the case like with the babolat pure strike series.
 
Fed Kennedy

Fed Kennedy

Legend
TSTAVRO said:
Thank you everyone for the loads of info and good chats. I had a chance to hit with the G360+ PMP and I have to say it ended up being a bit of a let down after getting extensive match play in. Definitely does feel flexible, but does not 'solid up' the same way the IG PMP does. The 98 head did help somewhat, especially on the 2-handed BH, however it didn't really click for me with most other parts of my game. Biggest thing that I was surprised about was I felt like despite the 98 head, it had much less spin potential than the IG PMP. I tried it with a couple different string setups with shaped poly's @ 48 lbs (tour bite soft 16 and confidential 17), and different lead tape setups in the hoop. My go-to is usually a generous amount from 10-2 (don't always weigh it lol). I have never had a problem with spin potential in my IG PMP even strung at low 50's with alu power smooth 16g, however I couldn't find the spin to really bring my kick serves down and jump that I can with the IG. My kick serves are a strength in my game and I couldn't reason to pick up the g360+ when I feel as though it has maybe slightly less control, and give me less spin!.. What a strange combination of cons. Not a bad racquet, but not for me.

On that note, I am back to playing with my IG's for now. However, i'd still like to try some other options. Thoughts on a comparison between the IG PMP and the Dunlop CX Tour 18x20 (weighted-up and un-weighted). Let me know!

Thank you in advance.
Click to expand...
So here is something really nerdy but…I can get more kick with the pt 2.0 than the 360+mp and I think its because that old head pallet locks your hand in perfect continental resulting in better serve technique.
 
Fed Kennedy

Fed Kennedy

Legend
J-Wildcard said:
Interesting reading the thoughts on the is thread echoing my own feelings regarding this comparison. I am in the same boat where I have been trying the last gen 360+ Prestige rackets, I actually tried the Pro first and it felt great to handle, the head size was nice, beam a little wider than I like but not too bad. I tried this with a full bed of poly @54 but it felt slightly stiff which I understand the frame layup is stiffer. I actually felt when I was putting my full power on I was over hitting a little bit with this racket. I have now been hitting with a 360+ Prestige MP and it feels easy regards the swing weight and the handling of the racket. However when serving something is very different in it and when I try a second serve with less pace I am struggling to get the ball in strangely without concentrating more and trying a bit harder? It does feel effortless to rally with and the sweetspot seems to be there for me a lot and makes it easy. My issue is when I put that extra power in for a bigger shot I seem to be struggling to get the power to transfer through from the frame into the ball. It feels a fair bit less overall in the control department which I guess means going tighter on the string tension and maybe looking at other hybrid set ups too?
I haven't tried the newer Auxetic frame yet but am hearing mixed reviews on how much better it is than the older red 360+ MP. Certainly hearing it is slightly stiffer feeling and marginally heavier swingweight wise too. All that being said I am not sure it is worth selling the 360+ MP I already have for a minimal upgrade / difference. I have thought about trying a yonex vcore pro 97hd and a blade v8 18x20 but that's more out of curiosity at this stage. From what I can see the blade 98 V8 looks more similar to the IGMP but with a different specs in that the static weight is moved down and the balance changed too which is usually the case like with the babolat pure strike series.
Click to expand...
Interesting so what racquet are you coming from?
 
J-Wildcard

J-Wildcard

Semi-Pro
Fed Kennedy said:
Interesting so what racquet are you coming from?
Click to expand...
From the Prestige IG MP that I have hit with a lot of hours over the years. Whenever I try the newer Head rackets and I have purchased a few such as the speed when that was one of the first to adopt to the squarer pallet. With this frame then yes the pallet is definitely a variable and as you say will make a difference that I am aware of. I think when volleying and quickly changing the racket and returning the shots when you have very little time to react then any change to the grip is even more exaggerated.
 
T

taylor15

Hall of Fame
Fed Kennedy said:
So here is something really nerdy but…I can get more kick with the pt 2.0 than the 360+mp and I think its because that old head pallet locks your hand in perfect continental resulting in better serve technique.
Click to expand...
I swap all of my head frames to the TK82 pallet.
 
J-Wildcard

J-Wildcard

Semi-Pro
I've just been using the red 360+ Prestige MP, it's a nice enough racket but feels like an intermediate level frame certainly in comparison to the older series (iprestige IGMP)
It seems like the enlarged sweetspot in the same way as the gravity pro makes hitting easier if you need the help. I am finding that whilst it is easier it is not as rewarding with the hit and the feel whilst not bad is also not as good. I am going to increase the string tension as the wider spacing seems to be giving me a slight lack of control compared to my old frames.
 
Fed Kennedy

Fed Kennedy

Legend
J-Wildcard said:
I've just been using the red 360+ Prestige MP, it's a nice enough racket but feels like an intermediate level frame certainly in comparison to the older series (iprestige IGMP)
It seems like the enlarged sweetspot in the same way as the gravity pro makes hitting easier if you need the help. I am finding that whilst it is easier it is not as rewarding with the hit and the feel whilst not bad is also not as good. I am going to increase the string tension as the wider spacing seems to be giving me a slight lack of control compared to my old frames.
Click to expand...
Wilcard whats your take on pt 2.0?
 
J-Wildcard

J-Wildcard

Semi-Pro
Fed Kennedy said:
Wilcard whats your take on pt 2.0?
Click to expand...
I've not played with the pt 2.0. I am going to pick one up soon but I didn't rush out to get one as the specs seemed very similar to many frames I already have. I have many closed pattern 18/20 control frames especially from Head
I would like an original PT57A however.
 
Fed Kennedy

Fed Kennedy

Legend
J-Wildcard said:
I've not played with the pt 2.0. I am going to pick one up soon but I didn't rush out to get one as the specs seemed very similar to many frames I already have. I have many closed pattern 18/20 control frames especially from Head
I would like an original PT57A however.
Click to expand...
How about that Dunny in your avatar? Is that the tour 18x20?
 
J-Wildcard

J-Wildcard

Semi-Pro
I've been hitting with the 360+ PMP again last two days but it still seems a long way off where my IG was for control and playability to be honest. It gives more power on slower hits but when really giving the ball power i feel disconnected from the ball. I think string tension is far too low for me in this frame (46/48) need to try at around 54lbs and then see how it feels. For me currently it feels like a lot of 16/19 frames do from past head frames (IG Rad pro comes to mind) the grip is also Tk82S which I can feel is mostly an issue on my serve and bh slice, the forehand and backhand I think I can cope with the variance more. I could change the grip over but I will only really want to do that if I am going to keep this racket moving forward. At the moment though I am seeing more downsides from moving from the IGMP to this than upsides. The whole head range right now does not seem to offer a control players racket currently that I think can give me what I am looking for. I am tempted to try a vcore pro 97 and Wilson v8 18x20 but also these may be nice rackets but not at the level of the IGMP frames I already own.
The one that does appeal a little is the PT2.0 but I hear it is also demanding but I would be keen to try. I have a speed pro 360+ also and have had a gravity pro last year for a while too but am running out of options. Lastly I heard the Prince phantom 97 18 x 20 is also nice but not as easy to get now the new models are out so may be staying with the IGMP frames for a while longer now.
 
WYK

WYK

Hall of Fame
TSTAVRO said:
I am a long time user of the Head Youtek IG Prestige MP. I am looking for something slightly more forgiving, however I have searched far and wide- nothing compares, and I am back to looking at a new prestige as it may be the most viable option. I am currently waiting for a demo, but would appreciate some input. As the 360+ Prestige MP/ auxetic prestige pro are 98's, I figure this may be a good transition from the old 95's version I have been playing with. If anyone has experience with the IG prestige mp/ 360+ mp and can give me an idea of what has changed as far as feel, and directional control etc. that would be much appreciated!

Thank you in advance!
Click to expand...

Not only is the new 98 Prestige more forgiving, it is also a bit easier to string.
 
J-Wildcard

J-Wildcard

Semi-Pro
I am tempted to increase the tension from the current hybrid I have in of 46/48 where I have very little control and go up to a hybrid at 52/54 which should at least let me be able to hit out full power and make it more predictable. I was hitting again last night, I started with the prestige 360+ MP but just felt I was lacking full Control over my power when I tried to put it in. I would expect usually with an 18/20 bed the control would be there but I guess the wider spacing has changed things for sure. I did play with a blade amplifeel 18/20, that hit a very heavy ball. Solid racket but a little stiff but bar the balance felt closer to the IGMP I use than the newer 360+ MP, maybe feels too soft to me.
 
Fed Kennedy

Fed Kennedy

Legend
J-Wildcard said:
I am tempted to increase the tension from the current hybrid I have in of 46/48 where I have very little control and go up to a hybrid at 52/54 which should at least let me be able to hit out full power and make it more predictable. I was hitting again last night, I started with the prestige 360+ MP but just felt I was lacking full Control over my power when I tried to put it in. I would expect usually with an 18/20 bed the control would be there but I guess the wider spacing has changed things for sure. I did play with a blade amplifeel 18/20, that hit a very heavy ball. Solid racket but a little stiff but bar the balance felt closer to the IGMP I use than the newer 360+ MP, maybe feels too soft to me.
Click to expand...
Is your IG Prestige modified? I remember thinking the frame had zero power…
 
J-Wildcard

J-Wildcard

Semi-Pro
Fed Kennedy said:
Is your IG Prestige modified? I remember thinking the frame had zero power…
Click to expand...
I have recently in the last few months out some tungsten at the top, not much just a couple of grams to get a bit more from it but you are correct, it is a pretty low powered frame and you have to bring your own power to the table, however this does give you the ultimate control over the power. I have been hitting with a blade amplifeel 18x20 and I am hitting very hard now and serving a bit faster too. That's a big jump in balance and swingweight, I am looking for a middle ground. I might even try a speed pro as this blade looks about the same size as a speed pro and is easier to use but still has power, not great to handle maneuverability wise so there is always a trade off and the stiffness is pretty high. I would ideally stay with Head rackets but the prestige has left me with few options. Everyone's style and technique varies and its how yours matches up with the equipment. I am just not feeling any precision at all with the prestige new mould now and don't want loads of free help and big sweetspot. It's taken all the good things from the frame for my tastes anyway. I will try one with tighter tension so I can take a bigger hit at the ball it just feels so different now, the whole thing and not in a good way to be honest. The spacing is like 16/19 which I think is where my control issues come from and then the increase head size, its how the racket flexes and just feels a bit flimsy. Serving has been a big problem with it too as that hasn't felt good.
 
J-Wildcard

J-Wildcard

Semi-Pro
TSTAVRO said:
Thank you everyone for the loads of info and good chats. I had a chance to hit with the G360+ PMP and I have to say it ended up being a bit of a let down after getting extensive match play in. Definitely does feel flexible, but does not 'solid up' the same way the IG PMP does. The 98 head did help somewhat, especially on the 2-handed BH, however it didn't really click for me with most other parts of my game. Biggest thing that I was surprised about was I felt like despite the 98 head, it had much less spin potential than the IG PMP. I tried it with a couple different string setups with shaped poly's @ 48 lbs (tour bite soft 16 and confidential 17), and different lead tape setups in the hoop. My go-to is usually a generous amount from 10-2 (don't always weigh it lol). I have never had a problem with spin potential in my IG PMP even strung at low 50's with alu power smooth 16g, however I couldn't find the spin to really bring my kick serves down and jump that I can with the IG. My kick serves are a strength in my game and I couldn't reason to pick up the g360+ when I feel as though it has maybe slightly less control, and give me less spin!.. What a strange combination of cons. Not a bad racquet, but not for me.

On that note, I am back to playing with my IG's for now. However, i'd still like to try some other options. Thoughts on a comparison between the IG PMP and the Dunlop CX Tour 18x20 (weighted-up and un-weighted). Let me know!

Thank you in advance.
Click to expand...
Did you try upping the tension on the prestige 360+ GMP. I felt at 46/48 tension it was too loose and no control or precision and I couldn't hit out with it full power with any confidence in comparison to the IGMP at the same tension, I think this needs to he up around 54lbs with such an open string bed, it not the old head dnese pattern that was on all the old head 18/20 frames.
 
J-Wildcard

J-Wildcard

Semi-Pro
I'm finished testing with the prestige gmp 360+
I've got a pro tour 2.0 coming which I'm looking forward to trying and a ultra pro also. I will still have my IGMP frames on standby but be nice to try there's control frames out. Looking at head whilst they offer a lot of different rackets now, there's is nothing in my zone now they have done this to the prestige line. I need full control and quality and the new one flexes too much in the throat I think, the head feels wrong. Just my opinion but it's not a precision instrument anymore. It's nice that the have made a prestige that is more easy to use but not the flagship model, I know a lot like the pro version which isn't a bad frame but with regard to the prestige pro 360+ the prestige IG Pro is a better stick than that. I think its a better frame, similar properties but I think it's a bit nicer and a bit more power as it had a stiffer lay up than the IGMP, which doesn't feel quite as nice but neither do the new head frames.
 
Fed Kennedy

Fed Kennedy

Legend
J-Wildcard said:
I'm finished testing with the prestige gmp 360+
I've got a pro tour 2.0 coming which I'm looking forward to trying and a ultra pro also. I will still have my IGMP frames on standby but be nice to try there's control frames out. Looking at head whilst they offer a lot of different rackets now, there's is nothing in my zone now they have done this to the prestige line. I need full control and quality and the new one flexes too much in the throat I think, the head feels wrong. Just my opinion but it's not a precision instrument anymore. It's nice that the have made a prestige that is more easy to use but not the flagship model, I know a lot like the pro version which isn't a bad frame but with regard to the prestige pro 360+ the prestige IG Pro is a better stick than that. I think its a better frame, similar properties but I think it's a bit nicer and a bit more power as it had a stiffer lay up than the IGMP, which doesn't feel quite as nice but neither do the new head frames.
Click to expand...
Wildcard: I battled the PT 2.0 vs the 360+ MP with the PT being the clear winner in both power and control. I think you will love it.
Do you have thoughts on the Dunlop CX 200 Tour?
 
J-Wildcard

J-Wildcard

Semi-Pro
Fed Kennedy said:
Wildcard: I battled the PT 2.0 vs the 360+ MP with the PT being the clear winner in both power and control. I think you will love it.
Do you have thoughts on the Dunlop CX 200 Tour?
Click to expand...
I haven't hit with the CX200 tour. I had a good look at it and must say it looks a nice frame but obviously need to hit with it to say how it plays. I did have a pure strike VS but got rid of that last week also. Its unfortunate for my tastes that Head doesn't really have a pro stock style top player based control frame anymore. The Pro tour 2.0 was a special edition tho so was a nice addition to the line and I have wanted one for a long time. The prestige pro 360+ I guess is pretty popular and I think it was an OK racket but don't like the feel personally, a bit stiff on the arm and not my to my taste. Wilson have made a move with putting the pro labs range out there but you pay the extra for it. For me Head now feel lower quality with the paints/grommets and the plushness is still there but reduced.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

rb__11
Head IG: Prestige MP vs Prestige Pro vs IG Radical Pro vs Radical MP
Replies
1
Views
2K
rb__11
rb__11
J
Comparison - Youtek Prestige MP vs XT Graphene Prestige MP
Replies
10
Views
2K
Jose SA
J
A
Prestige MP L vs Prestige MP Youtek 2010
Replies
0
Views
131
araset
A
Gee
Head IG Youtek Prestige MP vs PK Black Ace 98
Replies
0
Views
810
Gee
Gee
clutch21
Head Speed MP 18x20 vs. Head Prestige MP
Replies
3
Views
3K
un6a
U
Top