vtmike
Banned
A short but nice interview where he is talking about court speeds, rivals, GOAT debate...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6L0RNNW7Hs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E6L0RNNW7Hs
Federer SO reads these boards!
Federer SO reads these boards!
Actually that wouldn't surprise me at all.From what I hear he like to surf around internet a lot so there's certainly a chance he might have stumbled upon TW at some point.
Federer SO reads these boards!
Hey Fed if your out there....
CAKEWALK CITY!!
Hey Fed if your out there....
CAKEWALK CITY!!
Hey Fed if your out there.. Pete invites you to live in his hometown of the 90s...
CAKEWALK CITY
Hey Fed if your out there....
CAKEWALK CITY!!
Whos Fed's biggest challenge this at Wimby this year anyway? Karlovic? The guy who has failed to get out of the 1st round of Wimby the last 4-5 years?
Since we know neither Djoker or Murray will prolly not reach the final.
Verdasco? A nobody.
Tsonga? A nobody.
0 slams between all of them.
Count them. 000000000
Hey Fed if your out there....
CAKEWALK CITY!!
Dummy, get this through your thick skull. The fact that hardly anyone has a slam aside from Nadal and Federer speaks of just how great the two of them are, but about how bad the others are. How many times does this have to be repeated? It's impossible to win slams if two players are hogging them all with sustained excellence.
Oh thats the only reason.. I see. :???: Cause Nadal and Fed are too good. Not because the rest of the field arent all the great. Im sure if you stick Roddick in any area he would be a multiple time grand slam champ right? Im sure if you stick Nalbandian, Blake, Karlovic, Tsonga, Verdasco, they would be mutltiple grand slam champs in any other era. Sure...
Whos Fed's biggest challenge this at Wimby this year anyway? Karlovic? The guy who has failed to get out of the 1st round of Wimby the last 4-5 yearss
Since we know neither Djoker or Murray will prolly reach the final.
Verdasco? A nobody.
Tsonga? A nobody.
0 slams between all of them.
Count them. 000000000
You know its funny.. Is there anyone even capable of winning slam today outside the top 2?
Hey Fed if your out there....
CAKEWALK CITY!!
Oh thats the only reason.. I see. :???: Cause Nadal and Fed are too good. Not because the rest of the field arent all the great. Im sure if you stick Roddick in any area he would be a multiple time grand slam champ right? Im sure if you stick Nalbandian, Blake, Karlovic, Tsonga, Verdasco, they would be mutltiple grand slam champs in any other era. Sure...
At what point, does some blame GO ON the rest of the field for failing to produce at the highest level?
Instead of just saying.. Ehh the top 2 players are too good. Why is it a player like Djoker and Murray can win smaller tourneys and beat Nadal or Fed in the process, yet they cant even get by players they are SUPPOSED TO BEAT, when it matters most?
Oh come on!! Another worthless GOAT debate initiated by GameSampras...
No.. No GOAT debate. I just think its ridiculous just to shrug everything off as saying, the top 2 players are just too good, and everyone elses slams were taken away. Roddick got screwed out of 10 slams by Fed etc etc. Bottom line is.. Its not a one way street. Its not just Fed and Nadal are too good regardless of what the rest of the field does. Its the problem of the rest of the field for years never answering that challenge especially at the slams. Its a mixture of both. Fed and Nadal being great players, the rest of the field, not ever seemingly to be able to getting up to par.
I love how the acronym GOAT incites riots...
Federer's draw this year is undoubtedly the hardest that he has faced for some time at SW19. Kholi, Soderling, then Tsonga/Verdasco, then Djokovic and then most likely Murray or Roddick.
If the seeds hold out, he would beat #27, #13, #7, #4 and then #3 to win this title. That's a tough run and if he does it, it will be impressive.
Excellent interview. Mad props to OP - keep em coming!
you're just jealous that Pete wasn't good enough to prevent his opposition from winning slams during his supposed dominance, despite having a relatively weak field. Yeah, I'm talking about the era when kafelnikov won two slams, and marcelo rios was world # 1.. Sorry, if Pete was as good as federer or nadal, he wouldn't have let that happen
By your logic (bolded part), it would mean that the grass court competition in the 90s was a joke because none (bar krajicek) could pose any threat to Pete.. In other words, his wimbledon victories were a result of his residence in CAKEWALK CITY