he hit it great in the finals and in the semis, but i haven't seen him do it enough to say it's one of the greatest. i'd put lendl and sampras at #1/#2 (in some order) right now.
Flat, seemingly out of nowhere -- similar to how Sampras did it, only with even more pace.
Would be interested to hear other thoughts.
As always, no trolling or hating, please...mature posters only. Thank you.
He has too win the point with it or he is doomed, he doesn't recover his position well on it, Murray, Nadal, Federer and Djokovic all have better running forehands because they can recover there position.
No way was Lendl's running FH better than Sampras'...if Lendl's running FH was better than Pete's he wouldn't have been owned by Becker in slam finals (0-3) or by teenage Pete in the 1990 US Open.
No they don't...they don't hit nearly the amount of outright winners off the running FH as Delpo does (Fed comes close, but definitely not Nadal, Murray or Djoker).
Sampras was the last person I saw who could regularly hit outright winners off the running FH from seemingly defensive positions in long rallies -- best examples would be in the 1st set of the 1993 Wimbledon final against Courier.
Del Potro has to hit a winner or he is doomed, he can't recover his position due to his limited movement.
Overall Lendl beat Becker 11 times out of 21. Which means that their overall games matched up well. Becker had more success in 'big events' vs. Lendl. Which means (perhaps) that, overall, Becker had a bit extra.
That said, to say that he can't have the greatest running forehand since he lost to Becker in slam finals is irrelevant. The running forehand is ONE part of the game. Might as well say that Becker's serve could not be more powerful than Lendl's because Lendl was 11-10 vs. Becker. Irrelevant, just one part of the game.
And in my opinion, Lendl had the greatest running FH of all time. Just my opinion.
His forehand is impressive, but his running isn't nearly on par with Nadal, Sampras, or Federer. So, if you get him out of position he will not cover the court quite as well.
No they don't...they don't hit nearly the amount of outright winners off the running FH as Delpo does (Fed comes close, but definitely not Nadal, Murray or Djoker).
Sampras was the last person I saw who could regularly hit outright winners off the running FH from seemingly defensive positions in long rallies -- best examples would be in the 1st set of the 1993 Wimbledon final against Courier.
His forehand is impressive, but his running isn't nearly on par with Nadal, Sampras, or Federer. So, if you get him out of position he will not cover the court quite as well.
Del Potro has to hit a winner or he is doomed, he can't recover his position due to his limited movement.
I disagree, of the bunch you mentioned Nadal is clearly the most dangerous on the run. Top that with the fact that he's also the quickest and you've got a guy that will not only get to more balls than anyone else (at his prime) but will also punish the ball better than anybody when he gets to it.
Here's my top 5 ranking of running FH':
- Nadal
- Sampras
- Rios
- Federer
- Agassi
Del Potro has to hit a winner or he is doomed, he can't recover his position due to his limited movement.
Lendl's running FH as a passing shot was great, but not in baseline rallies -- he couldn't consistently turn defense to offense from the baseline with his running FH -- otherwise he would have never lost to Wilander or Chang in slams.
what are you talking about? you obviously never saw lendl play. he could turn defense into offense easily. yeah, he lost matches in grand slams but that is virtually irrelevant to his running forehand. in that case, sampras' running forehand wasn't that great b/c he lost to yzaga, korda, and a bunch of no name's in the french open.
the difference between deplo and sampras is that delpo is hitting that running fh from 10 feet behind the baseline...pete used to camp at the baseline and hit them while stalking the baseline.
delpo is hitting the harder shot but sampras ultimately more effective.
delpo needs to prove himself over the long haul to be compared to pete in this area. one or two matches doesnt cut it.
I saw prime Lendl many times -- against Mecir in 89 Aus, Chang in 89 French, handled at Wimbledon and US Open by Becker. Also saw him handled by Wilander in 83 Aus.
Lendl was a great player -- very underrated on this board b/c he had no personality and wasn't nice. But to put his running FH in the category of Sampras is laughable.
And BTW, I never said Delpo's running FH was better than Sampras' -- it isnt; Sampras' running FH is still the best of all time IMO.
No way was Lendl's running FH better than Sampras'...if Lendl's running FH was better than Pete's he wouldn't have been owned by Becker in slam finals (0-3) or by teenage Pete in the 1990 US Open.