Cesc Fabregas
Legend
I think Nadal by far, what do you think?
Both of them usually come in after the point has been won from the baseline. I think Djokovic comes in on tougher balls more often.
Djokovic has a better net game, he just doesn't have the gut to come in, never has. Nadal is pretty good at the net because he comes in on good approaches.
Djokovic really improved his net game as of late, he can do some nice things there. Nadal...I'm still not impressed with his net game, maybe because he barely ever comes in.
Nadal comes in more than Djokovic, today Nadal came into the net quite alot and Djokovic came in once or twice. Nadal also has better technique and feel on his volleys, Nadal is a better volleyer.
djokovic's volley has become better than it was before. since his camp has been trying to get him to volley more often. i've noticed it in Cincinnati against federer. he would come to net usually behind a decent approach, and i do recall times when i thought he was just rushing the net recklessly, but still manages to do something right.
nadal however has better touch at net especially when he chases down a drop shot. but nadal only comes to net to either chase down a ball, follow up on a good approach, or when he sees his opponent on the run.
i'll go with djokovic on this one. although nadal has so much clutch when it comes to finding a short angle, drop volley or flicking an opponents attempted drop shot in the most unreachable places, djokovic can actually volley a deep "first volley" as well as an acute "second volley" and will actually attempt to rush the net, even if the opponent isn't completely out of position.
They're both excellent net players, when they actually come in.
Djokovic doesn't put his volleys away like Nadal does, though.
So I'm going to give Nadal the edge- he has more "pop" and more "punch" on his volleys than Djokovic.
Djokovic often screw up at the net even when he comes in on good approachs, Nadal usually puts his volley away.
Why did you make this poll if it is so obvious, according to you?
I think Nadal by far, what do you think?
I prefer Roger when it comes to the BH smash.Also, don't forget that Nadal has the best high backhand volley in the game right now.
The shot I'm referring to might be called the backhand smash, too.
Lots of doubles players, notably Paes, do it- Nadal does it better.
I think Novak but only slightly better.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FLHfWGSkSIs
Also, don't forget that Nadal has the best high backhand volley in the game right now.
The shot I'm referring to might be called the backhand smash, too.
Lots of doubles players, notably Paes, do it- Nadal does it better.
Also, don't forget that Nadal has the best high backhand volley in the game right now.
The shot I'm referring to might be called the backhand smash, too.
Lots of doubles players, notably Paes, do it- Nadal does it better.
Nadal has the best BH smash? Really? I don't think I've seen him do that a lot. Fed rarely misses those and many times they are clean winners. He hit an awesome one at the Wimbly 07 final against Nadal.
Both are poor volleyers with cringe-worthy technique compared to today's version of "real deal" examples (Federer, Ancic, et al), but between the two, Nadal appears to use it to his advantage more than Djokovic.
LOL. Federer and Ancic aren't great at the net, they might look it today but if they played in the 80's or 90's they would be considered mediocre volleyers.
LOL. Federer and Ancic aren't great at the net, they might look it today but if they played in the 80's or 90's they would be considered mediocre volleyers.
Ancic is actually good at net. But yeah, Federer would be considered mediocre.
Fed is very, very good at net, even to 80s-90s standard. He showed some vs Sampras at Wimby. He whipped Philippoussis at Wimby for 1st slam.
He just doesn't volley enough nowadays.
Federer's S&V game 01-03 is overrated, yes he S&V well on grass during that time but not as good as made out, he got out S&V by Henman and Ancic. He also only S&V on grass, on other surfaces the only time he came to net as to shake hands at the end of the match.
Of course he is clearly overrated. People make it look like Sampras in 01 was the same invicible Sampras of 95 or 99. Yeah; actually what Federer accomplished wasn't that great. I mean, Roddick straight setted Sampras that year, and a bunch of other nobodies beat up on him too. Clearly Sampras in 01 was not a great player. Yet people are like "OMG HE OUT S&VED OLDMAN SAMPRAS"
Great accomplishment there. You were able to beat a pro at the twilight of his career during probably statistically his worst year since he became a slam champion.
Federer is not very good at the net. Dude routinely dumps forehand volleys all the time. He did it a good 10 times against Nadal during the Wimbledon 08 final, on EASY balls too.
Fed lacked confidence going into the match. He looked very nervous & was close to losing in straight, only rain saved him.
The beating he took at FO a month earlier left quite a few scars.
Hitting a volley under tremendous pressure is different from hitting one when you're dominating.
Exactly. Sampras was the on the downslide, if he somehow beat Federer he would have definatley lost to Henman. Henman gave Federer a lesson in S&V.
You have no clue if you think Federer and Ancic have mediocre volleys, by any standards.LOL. Federer and Ancic aren't great at the net, they might look it today but if they played in the 80's or 90's they would be considered mediocre volleyers.