Of course he isnt going to get triple bageled. I could see Djoker winning some Australian Opens.. Thats about it to be honest. Djoker is a hell of a clay courter but there were even better in the 90s on clay than Djoker. Wimbeldon forget about it. He cant even handle Tommy Haas. USO perhaps depending if he reached some insane level of tennis. But I could see a few players taking him out there. Rafter at his peak possibly, Agassi for sure, Sampras for sure.. A few others. here and there Better than Sampras no way. Djoker is a well know headcase who cant seem to handle the pressure of big matches and the pressure of being on top, Sampras easily disposed of players like that as does Roger. When I look at Djoker I see alot of talent, some it perhaps more untapped, but then I see how mentally weak he is.. And thats just not a good combination. Djoker is alot like Agassi during what were supposed to be his peak years. 1994-1995 like but on a much lesser scale. Though not as good as Andre of course.
2 slams for Djoker possibly in the 90s.. 3 slams at the very most. Quite a few players who could destroy Djoker at Wimbeldon as there was a more solid grass court field then. You have a handful of guys who could take him on clay though Djoker could hold his own I think. USO- Guys like Andre and Pete could take DJoker out. I think his bet opportunities would be the australian.
I think if Djoker had the mental confidence and fitness level (no breathing problems) he would be a big time player in any era. He has alot of talent but his mental game never has managed his physical game unfortunately for him
that ''insane'' level of tennis he reached in late '07, maybe you should watch some of his summer hardcourt matches then. he had set points on federer in both the first and second sets of the USO final, and lost that match mostly out of nerves.
federer won, but Djokovic was, on the whole, the better player for those first two sets. if he had already won a slam and was in that position, i fully expect he'd have beaten federer, possibly in 4 sets or even 3.
his serve, which we all know is his reliable weapon in that period, deserted him in the crucial moments.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ivfrbx_Uweo
watching that highlight vid, i also must say that the chase review gave federer the nod every time in the highlight reel, lol.
also watched the 2008 final highlights, and i gotta say that federer was maybe playing better last year there than the year before, he was taking SO many shots on the rise and placing them perfectly. im sure part of it was because murray just looked lost, but federer definitely found a groove last year during the final.