Ideally I'd like to get to 11.3....11.5 max. I was hoping to use the heavy butt cap (or other weight) in the handle to increase HL balance. But if strings and an overgrip alone hit the limit then I may have to start with the silver lite and build up. This is a shame because the silver is my favorite cosmetic....silver lite is my least favorite. Hopefully the silver you received was abnormal?? Interested to see the TW spec sheet for these frames.
On the other hand, maybe a light swinging 11.5+ racquet will be just fine for me. Won't know til it's in my hand.
I had 3 silvers when I was trying them. They were 303, 303 and 301 barcode, true weight, unstrung.
They are listed as 300, so that's pretty much right on.
Strings are going to be 16-20g in a 99 with 16x19, an OG is typically 6g and most dampners are 2-3g.
So if you get one that is close to stock, you can figure on it weighing about 324g (11.42oz) before you modify it at all.
The ones I had had a significantly higher swingweight than they list, which for me was nice as I wanted it higher, and it meant I didn't have to add as much lead. I'm not sure what to make of that, as all 3 had essentailly identical swingweights, all higher than spec.
Bottom line is if 11.5 is the heaviest you want to go, just adding an OG and a dampner to an on-spec silver will pretty much get you there. If you want room to modify it, you're pretty much going to have to go with the silver-lite.
I've been through a lot of Donnay's in my trials, I think I've played with almost 20 now. I've found the variability in specs to be similar to other companies, the one difference being they actually print the specs on the racquet. Like other racquets, you can figure on a 5% variability, but with Donnay, if you have a particular spec you want, you can at least ask for racquets that are close to it.
Just as an example, I've been playing with 3 Blacks for several months now. I asked for similar specs, but apparently wasn't specific enough... The barcodes (which matched actual specs) are:
325305
325310
325315
So the weights were identical, but the balance varied by a full cm. The (strung) swingweights followed the pattern, being 326, 333, and 341 respectively. It was pretty easy to modify/match them, but if one didn't check and just assumed they were identical because you asked, you'd have racquets that played very differently.
I think in general people don't appreciate how much racquet specs can vary from published numbers. This is very evident in the TWU measurements. TWU always tests a single racquet, and the one they happen to test can be a lot different than the norm, resulting in test numbers very different that what you are likely to get if you buy one. It would be nice if TWU made an effort to get a test stick that was close to the published stats, or at least the average TW takes for the description page, but I digress...