95-100" box beam

Gasolina

Professional
Not sure, but my understanding is these box beams are solid and not hollow like thicker beamed frames. That's why most box beam frams are smaller and heavier than their MP counterparts.

If you had a box beam MP it may be too heavy
 

jorel

Hall of Fame
Not sure, but my understanding is these box beams are solid and not hollow like thicker beamed frames. That's why most box beam frams are smaller and heavier than their MP counterparts.

If you had a box beam MP it may be too heavy
6.0 95 was perfect
 

movdqa

Talk Tennis Guru
> any current racquets fit this profile?

Pro Stock Pro Staff 95 in K95 paintjob. Not bad to look at.
 

movdqa

Talk Tennis Guru
There's one for sale at the big auction site for $499. It's been there for a while.
 
Gotta love these...HPS 6.0 95

IMG_5399.jpg
 

stevewcosta

Professional
Not sure, but my understanding is these box beams are solid and not hollow like thicker beamed frames. That's why most box beam frams are smaller and heavier than their MP counterparts.

If you had a box beam MP it may be too heavy

Not correct. Yonex made a ton of 95/97/98 box beams back "in the day" (when racquets were good) that weren't too heavy (unless too heavy is > = 12 ounces). Just needs the right balance.
 

kimguroo

Legend
prince rebel 95. 20mm beam.
prince rebel 105 might be out of range but head shape looks like 100"
21mm beam
prince graphite too. both old version or EXO3.

Head IG speed MP.
 
Babolat Pure Storm, Pure Storm Tour and Pure Storm Ltd.
Dunlop 200.
HEAD Prestige mp/pro/whatever.
Fischer used to make a 95 m-comp or m-pro that was flat/box beamed. Nice. Maybe Pacific has reissued it.
 

cellofaan

Semi-Pro
Not sure, but my understanding is these box beams are solid and not hollow like thicker beamed frames. That's why most box beam frams are smaller and heavier than their MP counterparts.

If you had a box beam MP it may be too heavy
Rackets are always hollow. They may be filled with foam, but they're not solid graphite.
 
Top