With the return of the Pro Staff 85...any chance my beloved Wilson Pro Staff 6.0 95 will be back?
If so, I will order 3 in 4 3/8". I am sure I am not the only one.
call up dogopolovNew PJ, obviously!
You know what's funny? I kinda did call up Dolgopolov. While watching his match against Djokovic, I poked around online and found the email address of his agent. I sent him an email asking about getting my hands on a few figuring I'd never hear anything back; and I didn't... until this morning. It turns out it took so long because his agent had forwarded my email to the global marketing manager of Wilson. The response, quoted below, is very encouraging.
“Wilson is launching that racket again in their 2012 range, the name will be Pro Staff SIX ONE 95 BLX, and with a great new cosmetic, should be available in every retailers on January 2012”
While there's no mention of the weight or balance, I'm hoping all of that stays true to the original. In another part of the email he mentions it being the, "same shape (as) Alex's." I've got about a dozen 6.0 95's in varying stages of decay. A fresh run of these made available at a reasonable price is what I've been waiting for for years. Just can't find anything quite like 'em and can't afford shelling out $300+ for new ones from those that still have them ****. Let's hope everything stays on track for a January release!
6.1 yes, no way this is the box beam 95 6.0You know what's funny? I kinda did call up Dolgopolov. While watching his match against Djokovic, I poked around online and found the email address of his agent. I sent him an email asking about getting my hands on a few figuring I'd never hear anything back; and I didn't... until this morning. It turns out it took so long because his agent had forwarded my email to the global marketing manager of Wilson. The response, quoted below, is very encouraging.
“Wilson is launching that racket again in their 2012 range, the name will be Pro Staff SIX ONE 95 BLX, and with a great new cosmetic, should be available in every retailers on January 2012”
While there's no mention of the weight or balance, I'm hoping all of that stays true to the original. In another part of the email he mentions it being the, "same shape (as) Alex's." I've got about a dozen 6.0 95's in varying stages of decay. A fresh run of these made available at a reasonable price is what I've been waiting for for years. Just can't find anything quite like 'em and can't afford shelling out $300+ for new ones from those that still have them ****. Let's hope everything stays on track for a January release!
im thinking ur right6.1 yes, no way this is the box beam 95 6.0
Wilson is launching that racket again in their 2012 range, the name will be Pro Staff SIX ONE 95 BLX, and with a great new cosmetic, should be available in every retailers on January 2012
They could but then they would have to kill you. :wink:can anyone at TW confirm this?
i wanna dieThey could but then they would have to kill you. :wink:
i wanna die
They could but then they would have to kill you. :wink:
That's exactly why they don't want to confirm it. They want you to buy what they have in inventory now. It's the same reason why almost all companies keep their upcoming new products under wraps until they are available for sale - they don't want to cannibalize sales of their existing products which they still have plenty of inventory of.ha!
i'm looking for confirmation because if this release is actually going to happen, i'll wait for the new 95 instead of spending money on something else.
Great! Looking forward to it. From what we know of the specs right now, it looks like the PS Six-One 95 BLX is lighter than the good ole' PS 6.0 95 (11.3 oz. vs 11.6 oz. unstrung).I'm hitting with the Pro Staff Six One 95 BLX on Wednesday. I'll have my 6.0 95's with me for comparison. For reference, I use the ones with a black butt cap though I do have one with a white butt cap and will bring it along as well. I'll post thoughts here Wednesday afternoon/evening.
That's exactly why they don't want to confirm it. They want you to buy what they have in inventory now. It's the same reason why almost all companies keep their upcoming new products under wraps until they are available for sale - they don't want to cannibalize sales of their existing products which they still have plenty of inventory of.
seagulltennis said:He couldn't remember what the head size was on it though; just that it was mostly white and was a box beam.
BreakPoint said:From what we know of the specs right now, it looks like the PS Six-One 95 BLX is lighter than the good ole' PS 6.0 95 (11.3 oz. vs 11.6 oz. unstrung).
I posted a pic the other day. Looks like it was wiped out. Pic is here. It's of the 90.
i dare u to post it again...jkThere is a reason we are deleting it for now. Please stop re-posting the image.
Spencer, TW.
i dare u to post it again...jk
I hope I struck the right chord between being too vague to be useful and so specific that it gets deleted. Feel free to ask questions, but let's be careful so that we don't make TW Staff or Wilson upset.
a couple general questions:
1) an extra cross string would make it 16/19. could you feel a difference in spin/control/power/response/etc. compared to the 6.0 95?
2) similar to #1, with the noticeable change in weight and balance, has stability been compromised?
we're talking an ounce and a half now
Is that strung or unstrung for the PS Six-One 95?11 oz even.
So if this PS Six-One 95 is 1.5oz. lighter than the PS 6.0 85, that would make it only 10.6 oz. unstrung. Yikes!
If this racquet really is only 10.6 oz. unstrung then that's way too light for me as I find even the PS 6.0 95 a bit too light at a whole ounce heavier. Oh well, I think my bubble just burst.Yikes! is right, especially since Wilson already has two other 95 sq in racquets (Tour and Team) close to that weight.
I guess that "respect the past, build for the future." slogan is referring to the past when Wilson slapped the "Pro Staff" name on racquets like the 6.5, 6.6, and 6.7.
Is that strung or unstrung for the PS Six-One 95?
The unstrung weight of the PS 6.0 95 is 11.6 oz and the PS 6.0 85 is 12.1 oz. for a difference of 0.5 oz.
So if this PS Six-One 95 is 1.5oz. lighter than the PS 6.0 85, that would make it only 10.6 oz. unstrung. Yikes!
If this racquet really is only 10.6 oz. unstrung then that's way too light for me as I find even the PS 6.0 95 a bit too light at a whole ounce heavier. Oh well, I think my bubble just burst.
You're right, this racquet shouldn't even be labeled a "Pro Staff".
i agree. if 11.0 is the strung weight, i don't know how this racquet could feel or play anywhere close to the 6.0 95.
my occasional issue with the 6.0 95 isn't lack of weight, but lack of stability. that's why i'm considering the 85 reissue. i too was hoping for a blx (or other updated) version of the 6.0 95. this clearly isn't it.
It's 11.0 unstrung. At least, that's what was marked on it.
1.5 oz lighter than the six.one tour, not the 6.0 85. New 95 is 11.0.
But the Six-One Tour 90 is 12.0 oz. unstrung, so if this new 95 is 1.5 oz. lighter, that would make it only 10.5 oz. unstrung.It's 11.0 unstrung. At least, that's what was marked on it.
But the Six-One Tour 90 is 12.0 oz. unstrung, so if this new 95 is 1.5 oz. lighter, that would make it only 10.5 oz. unstrung.
Or if you look at the strung weights, the Six-One Tour 90 is 12.5 oz. strung, so that would make this new 95 only 11.0 oz. strung?
I'm confused.