Logic Dude
New User
I did some searching and couldn't find a direct comparison. I'm just wondering what comparisons could be made between the two.
Thanks!
Thanks!
If you can handle the weight, a little lead at 3/9 does a lot to provide more stability with the Rebel.
Rebel is one of stablest racquets around for me. Dont forget to string it with soft and thin gauge poly to get most. I really loved Isospeed baseline spin in it. My next try will be RPM Blast 18, BB Ace, Cyclone 17
The racket doesnt feel like a closed string pattern at all.
Has loads of spin from both wings and kick serves are a monster with this.
So Torres, you disagree that it has good spin potential compared to the rebel?
I love the 6.1 18x20 - used them for about 3 years until I switched to the Juice Pro - but I would never describe the 6.1 18x20 as a stick that offers loads of spin and doesn't feel like it has a closed pattern. Are you sure you're not mistaking it for the 16x18?
Yes, it does. It feel exactly like what it is - a flat hitting, directionally precise, closed pattern stick.
That's a bit of an exaggeration.
^ I would recommend trying both of them, and also the 2012 Rebel 95, and also the 16x18 version of the 6.1. Just be aware that they're both demanding 'player' orientated sticks with not alot of margin if you're 'off' your game.
And yes, I would say the Wilson has more stability, SW are not too different but less shanking with the Wilson
Not sure how stability keeps you from shanking. Stability will help keep the racquet from recoiling on off center hits, but contact is up to the coordination of the player.
Mitch! still using the 2k9 or did you move to the 2k12?