I've played futures and I hit with pros regularly. While not at the level of Federer, Nadal or w/e, a racquet change is not such an earth moving experience. Pros that want to change and like the feel of new racquets will do so just fine. If Federer can't find a racquet that feels as good to him as his current one then he's not going to change. It has nothing to do with his canned responses on twitter about not having enough time. Bottom line is he doesn't want to or feels the need to. If he wanted to he'd do it.
Think of it this way. If Fed switched racquets at the start of the year to something he feels is better for him, even with the time it takes to adjust, do you think he would have had better, worse or the same results up to now? He just lost in the 2nd round of Wimbledon and barely scraped himself an atp250 title. He's not going to be doing any worse with a new racquet.
But that's not because of any differences in the way Head measures their frames. It's because they like nice round numbers for marketing when converting to metric measurements. So it's due to marketing in metric that Head's "93" is actually 89.5 and it's "98" is actually 95. They like to use the nice round metric numbers of 600, 630, 660, etc.Head measures their frames differently, so a 98" is actually a 95".
How do you know? He could lose in the 1st round of every tournament he enters. So there is a worst case scenario.He's not going to be doing any worse with a new racquet.
Do you think Phil Jackson can beat Michael Jordan/Kobe Bryrant in a 1 on 1? Then why would Jordan/Kobe ever listen to Phil Jackson?
The next time Phil Jackson tells Jordan/Kobe to change racquets, let me know. Strategy and equipment are two completely different things. If you played tennis just like Nadal, would you take Federer's advice that you should switch to a K90 because he himself plays great with it?Do you think Phil Jackson can beat Michael Jordan/Kobe Bryrant in a 1 on 1? Then why would Jordan/Kobe ever listen to Phil Jackson?
The next time Phil Jackson tells Jordan/Kobe to change racquets, let me know. Strategy and equipment are two completely different things. If you played tennis just like Nadal, would you take Federer's advice that you should switch to a K90 because he himself plays great with it?
Exactly! The satisfaction of hitting the ball with the PS 6.0 85 can only be exceeded by hitting the ball with a 65 sq. in. wood racquet.I think you guys need to go out there, hit a few balls with a 90, change back to your Weeds, and then jump into the discussion.
Nothing like the feel of smaller rackets. Precision, rewards, smoothness, feel.
I think Federer's problem is that he's getting old so his movement, reflexes, and motivation are not what they used to be. It has nothing to do with his racquet.I'm wonder, so you think 90 head size is the best for fed? With long and fast swing and stroke, topspin? For me, I think he can add just a couple inches on his racquet face. Just me though!
If you can't figure out how to beat someone after 16 tries, I don't think you're very smart.
So Federer should ask Gilbert for advice on how to win Slams?
Exactly! The satisfaction of hitting the ball with the PS 6.0 85 can only be exceeded by hitting the ball with a 65 sq. in. wood racquet.
And you think top players hire coaches to tell them what racquet they should be using? ROTFLMAO!!!
So Federer asks Annacone what he feels when he hits the ball? ROTFLMAO!!No moron, they hire coaches for ADVICE...on anything that may help including equipment!!!!
Trust me mental midget, if the tennis world allowed enough time to actually adjust to new equipment (which it DOES NOT) then every pro would be open to a change...the reason for sticking with a piece of equipment as important as the racquet is simply because it is a HUGE RISK to try something new.
Give these guys a 3-4 month "off season" like other sports and you'd see a lot of racquet experimentation. 2-3 weeks off around Christmas time is not enough to risk a big time racquet switch.
My advice to Fed...if you want another Wimbly...cry injury like Rafa...take off 6-7 months and try out new sticks, come back before Wimbly, destroy everyone, and then get knocked out first week of US Open!
And what does Brad Gilbert know? How many Slams did he win?
And if Sampras had switched and stopped winning Slams, do you know what he'd be saying today? "Darn, I should have never switched from my trusty PS 85!".
So Federer asks Annacone what he feels when he hits the ball? ROTFLMAO!!
So Federer should take the equipment advice of someone who used a POG Oversize during his career and served and volleyed and chipped and charged on EVERY single point, what racquet he should be using? ROTFLMAO!!!!
Yes, because Federer won so many more Slams AFTER he hired Annacone than before he hired him.Well..originally I thought mental midget was a little harsh...sorry, spot on. Starting to wonder if you are 10 years old?
Do you think, the best players in the world, who are calculated and meticulous about most of their decisions, spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on trainers, chefs, and of course COACHING (LOOK UP WHAT IT ENTAILS), only to be a closed minded child like yourself and not bother to ask or use the advice of these men they HAVE PAID HANDSOMELY...because they feel they have no valid opinion since they are less accomplished than them to begin with?
You're basically a fool if you do.
NEWS FLASH...if you know the sport, truly KNOW THE SPORT...you can make some pretty valuable observations...INCLUDING recognizing how a certain style may benefit from a tweaking of equipment....BUT..here is the part you can't wrap your simple mind around...THE ADVICE THEY'RE GIVING MAY ACTUALLY BE THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT THEY ACTUALLY FIND SUCCESS WITH!!!!
In fact you know why most champions make TERRIBLE COACHES...they ASSUME, like a moron, that what works for them works for everyone else. It's called teaching fool...and the Gilberts, Annacones, Cahills, etc of the world have proven their worth...BY GETTING PAID AND HAVING SLAM CHAMPS UNDER THEIR BELTS.
Grow up..think things out.
Yes, because Federer won so many more Slams AFTER he hired Annacone than before he hired him.
And how do you know if Roddick wouldn't have won more Slams if he had a different coach instead of Gilbert, who drove him nuts?
Did cracking forehands help Roddick beat Federer in any Slam finals? Did Roddick change racquets because of Gilbert? Did Murray win any Slams while he was with Gilbert? Maybe Roddick would have won Wimbledon if he had a different coach?I think Nadal's won a lot of slams with his non-grandslam winning coach. And who says Roddick would have ever won a slam without Gilbert. Roddick's career ended off him not cracking forehands anymore. With Gilbert, he was cracking forehands. No need to troll. Just facts.
Federer already did that. He used to play full gut, like Serena did. Gut/4G vs Gut/ALU Rough. Given that the two advantages 4G has is durability and slighly higher tension maintenance. Since they don't care about the latter, and that Federer plays in a tiny headsize so he doesn't eat as much strings, he has no business with 4G. While Serena uses a bigger headsize and doesn't hit with as much spin. She also doesn't switch racquets as much during a match.Serena switched strings and is now invincible. It wouldnt hurt fed to try
Gilbert is harping on this again this morning.
Lendl used a racquet that was even smaller than Sampras's or Federer's racquet. How many times did Gilbert beat Lendl? I thought so. :???:
Serena switched strings and is now invincible. It wouldnt hurt fed to try
I think Nadal's won a lot of slams with his non-grandslam winning coach. And who says Roddick would have ever won a slam without Gilbert. Roddick's career ended off him not cracking forehands anymore. With Gilbert, he was cracking forehands. No need to troll. Just facts.
Lendl switched racquets actually from the little Adidas to the much bigger Kneissel....he actually now plays with a bosworth .
Sampras switched to babolat didn't he?
And Connors switched to a bigger racquet in his later years as well.
He had no choice. He was playing kevlar because that's the only thing that wouldn't break on his OS racquets. And this, despite the custom made tighter patterns he used to use! Even if it was screwing his limbs.Agassi switched to Poly as well and made one of the greatest comebacks in history
Did cracking forehands help Roddick beat Federer in any Slam finals? Did Roddick change racquets because of Gilbert? Did Murray win any Slams while he was with Gilbert? Maybe Roddick would have won Wimbledon if he had a different coach?
Do you ask your coach to demo racquets for you and have him pick one for you to use or it is better for you to demo the racquets yourself and choose one for yourself?
Facts!!!! Obviously you haven't dealt with this fool...he no likey facts!!!!
:twisted:Waste of time.
No, Lendl didn't. He used a Kneissl before the Adidas and they were essentially the same racquet since Kneissl made it for Adidas. Lendl no longer plays on the ATP Tour so what he uses now is irrelevant, not that his old Adidas/Kneissl is available anymore anyway.Lendl switched racquets actually from the little Adidas to the much bigger Kneissel....he actually now plays with a bosworth .
Sampras switched to babolat didn't he?
And Connors switched to a bigger racquet in his later years as well.
Agassi also switched to a smaller racquet late in his career which helped him to extend his career. He went from a 107 oversize, which he had used for most of his career, down to a 102 midplus.Agassi switched to Poly as well and made one of the greatest comebacks in history
No, Lendl didn't. He used a Kneissl before the Adidas and they were essentially the same racquet since Kneissl made it for Adidas. Lendl no longer plays on the ATP Tour so what he uses now is irrelevant, not that his old Adidas/Kneissl is available anymore anyway.
Sampras no longer plays on the ATP Tour so what he uses is irrelevant. He's not trying to win Slams anymore.
Connors was finally forced to switch because he could no longer get anymore of his T-2000s because Wilson had stopped making them ages ago. At one point, Connors was so desperate to get more that he appealed to the public to sell him any old T-2000s that they were no longer using.
Agassi also switched to a smaller racquet late in his career which helped him to extend his career. He went from a 107 oversize, which he had used for most of his career, down to a 102 midplus.
Agassi also played with the retail Instinct at one point.He only played the 2003 US Open with the Prestige Classic 660. Then went back to his Radical Tour 690 (Oversize)
Agassi also played with the retail Instinct at one point.
He had no choice. He was playing kevlar because that's the only thing that wouldn't break on his OS racquets. And this, despite the custom made tighter patterns he used to use! Even if it was screwing his limbs.
There you go. Switching racquets late in a top pro's career usually doesn't work.Yup, but always returned to his Radical Tour 690 (260 Oversize).
I perfectly know he loved the strings. But what I said is that previously, he was forced to play with kevlar because there was nothing else he wasn't breaking and co-poly were not nearly as good. Luxilon, the standard for premium monofilament, started releasing that new co-poly which became the standard for mono in the early '00s IIRC. The good co-poly strings are pretty young, he hadn't access to it beforehand. Of course he would try these strings rather than kevlar, and of course it hits better than the barbed wire he used to hit with. Of course it helped his game to ditch his harsh strings for co-poly. He went from "average" to "good" strings. As I said, Federer already switched his strings from full-gut to Champion's Choice. He went from "good" to "good, but different". He's already using Luxilon. What should he do? Full Luxilon to hit loopy forehands all day long like Roddick?Did you read his book?
Because it talks about it extensively . It changed his game and facilitated his comeback big time .