The US has some bad taste buds.
It's a different world.The US has some bad taste buds.
Tennis would never reach the mammoth following that Cricket has.Still not as popular as cricket.
Yet Hank Hill loves golf
And those are?Tennis will never have the same popularity as football or basketball for various reasons, it’s clear as day.
Not as much funding as NBA/NFL/MLB, not a guaranteed paycheck/contract, very mentally taxing, very little money for players outside top 100, colleges focusing on national instead of international play, nobody that really represents a specific state or part of the country, not much cultural connection, not much popularity in schools, low funding from schools that aren’t D1, generally seen as something only people who can afford a club can play(not true, but old stereotype) and probably a few more.And those are?
Still not as popular as cricket.
You are probably right. I don't think there is another individual sport that comes even close overall.Considering that cricket numbers are severely limited to only three countries (India, Pakistan and Australia) that is not even global sport in its true sense. It is like Table tennis, which numbers are severely inflated by the Chinese.
Truly, Tennis is (or should be) in the top 3, and is obviously #1 individual sport.
cricket. south africa, bangladesh 170m, england have biggish populations too..Considering that cricket numbers are severely limited to only three countries (India, Pakistan and Australia) that is not even global sport in its true sense. It is like Table tennis, which numbers are severely inflated by the Chinese.
Truly, Tennis is (or should be) in the top 3, and is obviously #1 individual sport.
What's a "FIFA"? Is that Cricket or something?
It does even worse in other countries...so?
who cares?
usa is not the world
The only tennis star with almost universal recognition and popularity is Federer in the States. Rafa would be next, Djokovic isn't even on the radar. Sadly, Americans tend to tune out if an American isn't at the top of the heap. Roddick was never particularly popular, after 2006 when Andre retired, interest in the sport has died with the exception of Roger. Tennis will not revive in the US until a young American star emerges, and the probability of that hovers around 0.
You were clearly mistaken, Federer invented it. Except fore some pagan tribal parts of Europe, that is a universaly recognised fact by now.But, but... I thought Federer SAVED tennis!!!
The reason footbol/futbol/soccer is so popular is any half-starved kid capable of fighting off literal vultures from the drop dead poorest hole in the remotest corner of the globe can find a ball and a patch of dirt. It is the worlds lowest common denominator sport. It is also broadcasted on freely available state or national television, all day, every day... every day. It's sort of why tennis is so popular in Italy and France - they aren't the poorest dirt holes, but they do play tennis on dirt, which makes tennis courts very cheap, and it is popular in schools/culture, and it is on free tv often.
Another thing about soccer is any one can play it with little skill or knowledge. Unlike baseball, there are only two rules in soccer - don't use your hands unless you need to cheat in the finals, and pretend to be injured if you can draw a penalty kick. Anyone can, and does, follow these rules. You try and explain the baseball infield fly rule to a Frenchman and you'll be covered in half-digested non-pasteurised dairy products within minutes. Whenever I speak to Europeans regarding baseball, all of them take issue with all the rules. This is what makes baseball baseball. But nearly every European has played stick ball or field hockey, which is the extent of their sticky ball experience. The rules in these sports, by comparison to baseball, are nearly non existent. When you try to explain a forced run situation to a European, their eyes roll back in their heads, and that's after they've ASKED me to explain it to them. To most people, sports are meant as an escape from tedium, not a practice in tedium. Now, I can not think of a more tedious past time than watching some literal moron trot about the lawn while wearing gym shorts and socks up to their knees, but billions of others disagree.
In Europe, sports are meant to be affordable. ANY European can steal a soccer ball from someone or somewhere and then proceed to kick it against the side wall of your house while you are trying to enjoy your dinner. Pilfering a baseball, glove, and a bat, and then getting a couple dozen of their mates to do the same to play a sport is a lot to ask of them. They usually only partake in team activities like that in the middle of Paris.
A lot of it is culture, though. And, as with most sports 'culture', much of it is proxy tribalism and warring in practice. We all human beings secretly, or overtly, hate one another. Cricket is a pain in the hole sport to play and prepare for; the kind of thing you only do if you have hate in your heart. And then you have to deal with all the cricket players that are usually an utter shower of coonts. I should know, a friend of mine is one of them and I want to kick him in all his holes every time he speaks of cricket and most other activities he's interested in. It is a popular sport to watch, but few actually play it; like the Kentucky derby, or American football. And players make virtually no money at all in cricket at the top of the game; zero compared to an American football player whom mainly warms a bench, in fact. So it's popularity is in 'entertainment' only, as it isn't as much a past time as the numbers will suggest. It is a representation of nationalism/tribalism. It is a way for people to gather under one flag and cheer and drink copious amounts of cheap beer, pretend to be better than other countries or begrudge their superiority, and forget about life for a while. I also want to kick those a-holes up the hole as well and set the bar alight. But that may just be me. Cricket's main cultural contribution world wide, which is actually very closely shared with baseball, is it gives us a very affordable means to protect our homes, collect our slum lord rent, or destroy mail boxes.
Idiot Europeans. And you are sure they weren't just trolling you?When you try to explain a forced run situation to a European, their eyes roll back in their heads, and that's after they've ASKED me to explain it to them.
Good for the ESPN and the USTA! Now they've shown that it's financially feasible, they should keep it that way. This was by some margin the most knowledgeable and least obnoxious US Open crowd in the recent memory.I know this will upset many, but being the 13th favorite sport(or whatever) in the US is more important to the health of professional tennis than being the 1st or 2nd most popular sport in many other countries.
the only reason the USO was held this year was the 71 million dollars that ESPN paid to broadcast the event(otherwise the USTA would have been in the red)
Roland Garros, despite being held in a country where tennis is a lot more popular doesn’t get big money from TV deals(this was reported by Wertheim). That’s the only reason they allowed fans in, to at least get something out of holding the event.
so the next time we get another thread about how no one cares about tennis in the US, try to remember that. Stuff like bad ratings(btw the World Series got record low ratings this week. Pretty sure the sport will continue to go on here), bad participation, etc doesn’t really matter. There’s just so much money here.