Search results

If Fed were playing in the 90s and swapped places with Sampras, we would be talking about Fed having the best serve of all time. The Sampras serve is inferior to Fed's serve in EVERY aspect, including pace. Sampras has never cracked 140mph ever.

I can't seem to find a replacement bumper guard anywhere for this. Does anyone know if a generic Wilson 16x19 bumper guard, or one from the BLX Six one Team will work?

One of the best returners of all time can easily handle a dinosaur like sampras and his outdated game. You probably are a petetard.

You are delusional if you think nole is worse than Sampras on grass. Prime nole schools Sampras and his pathetic 120mph serves anytime. Sampras game is a dinosaur in this era and he would be barely top 20.

40 yr old, 25 yr old, Prime, who cares? The fact is Sampras is a relic from the past. You put Prime Sampras with his flat forehand, weak one handed backhand, and pathetic 120mph serve in the mix with this generation of players and he's barely top 50! His serves are the most overrated shots...

Prime Sampras would barely be a top 50 player today with that pathetic 120mph serve which practically everyone can do now.

Agassi and Sampras would never win a single Grand Slam. Their highest ranking would be #3 at best. Both Fed and Nadal would have won the career slam. Fed would have won 8 or more Wimbledons.

Fed has better 1st AND 2nd serves than Sampras.

So why was he ranked 17th in the world heading in the 2002 US open? Why did he lose to George Bastl at Wimbledon? Wimbledon of all places! Let's face it, Sampras had an outdated game and was lucky to be playing in a weak era.

Fed DOES have a better serve than Sampras. Sampras had an overrated 2nd serve.

#3 Federer!

Number 25. His outdated game will not bother anyone.

As stated. I vote Nadal.

Nadal will bagel Sampras. Becker can handle the high ball to the backhand better than Sampras, so he might get a couple of games off Nadal.

Nadal has a better wide slice serve than Pete Sampras.

Nadal will serve a bagel to Sampras. Sampras's overrated serves and net play will be useless in this strong era.

Proof? Or it didn't happen.

Ok, but I never claimed Fed had a faster serve than Sampras. I said it was better. 2mph doesn't make much of a difference. Fed has better precision.

Ok sorry, it was the other guy who mentioned it. But you said that he has more heat. I wouldn't call 2mph a significant difference

Fed doesn't need to S&V when his bread and butter is his baseline game. But when he does it, he is a class above Sampras. Look at their match in 2001. Fed's S&V >>> Sampras S&V Fed's Baseline game >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sampras baseline game

2mph is insignificant. You mentioned that Sampras hits 130 frequently while Fed has an average of 118 mph. I proved that they have virtually the same pace. Sampras was lucky that he was in a weak era. Today's players are better athletes and returners than the ones your boy Sampras faced

Big deal! It's as if Fed has never erased break points with his serve. YOu stated that Sampras has a greater average service speed than Fed, but apparently not so. Fed has virtually the same ball toss of most serves and his opponents can't read his serve. Fed can even do the leaping overhead...

http://www.tenniscruz.com/content/view/451/1/ Average first serve speed Federer: 114-121 mph Average first serve speed Pete Sampras: 114-123 mph Fastest first serve speed of Roger Federer: 135 mph 2006 Australian Open Fastest first serve speed of Pete Sampras: 135 mph 1998 US Open...

Proof? Link? Or it didn't happen. 130 is no big deal in this era, Soderling and Berdych do that regularly too.

Federer has a much better serve than SAmpras. Sampras's pathetic 120mph serve is ordinary in this era.

Fed's S&V are a class above Sampras. However, Fed's baseline game is better than his S&V. It makes sense that he would use whatever he was better at. This means that Fed is a class above Sampras in every department.

Sampras does nothing better than Federer. Sampras had an overrated serve and Fed paints the lines better than Sampras with his serve. Prime Sampras would never be in the top 10 in this era.

Fed would definitely dominate in the 90s. He is a class above clowns like Sampras, Becker, Krajicek and Stich.

There, corrected it for you. Pete Sampras is an inferior player to Federer in all aspects. Prime Sampras would never make the top 10 in this era.

Fed 01-10 would beat any version of Sampras. When Fed breaks Sampras's Wimbledon record, we won't even be having this discussion. Mark my words!