I believe that Sampras did not take clay seriously enough when it came to how it would impact the future historical analysis (his legacy) in a GOAT debate.
I think he could have had a MUCH BETTER clay record (and even an RG crown) if he had REALLY dedicated himself to it back during his prime.
He now has to suffer through "hindsight is 20/20" mode because the GOAT debate will always be dominated by the statistics first, no matter how much of a healthy dose of subjective analysis is also included.
I am pretty confident that EVERYONE on this board agrees with me, so moderators, please close this thread and make it a sticky :twisted:
I think he could have had a MUCH BETTER clay record (and even an RG crown) if he had REALLY dedicated himself to it back during his prime.
He now has to suffer through "hindsight is 20/20" mode because the GOAT debate will always be dominated by the statistics first, no matter how much of a healthy dose of subjective analysis is also included.
I am pretty confident that EVERYONE on this board agrees with me, so moderators, please close this thread and make it a sticky :twisted: