14 slams was the previous GS record. Nadal will have 14 slams at the most difficult slam to win.

[ForehandCross]

Mammoth. Incredibly immortal achievement.

 

[TheNachoMan]

There is no “most difficult slam to win” because it all depends on the player. But yeah, still a great accomplishment. Vamos

 

[GabeT]

There is no “most difficult slam to win” because it all depends on the player. But yeah, still a great accomplishment. Vamos

Yeah, incredible accomplishment but where does this “most difficult to win” come from?

 

[ClayCourter]

And Wimbledon is the easiest to lose

 

[BlueB]

Unbelievable achievement. Buy, it seems to be the easiest slam to win... for Rafa.

 

[TheNachoMan]

Yeah, incredible accomplishment but where does this “most difficult to win” come from?

If it was the most difficult to win, he’d have 15 at the other 3 slams. lol

 

[GabeT]

If it was the most difficult to win, he’d have 15 at the other 3 slams. lol

exactly

 

[darthrafa]

it is contradictory
the most difficult but winning 14th

 

[mehdimike]

exactly

I agree. Although I believe winning 14 RG titles is harder than winning 14 USO titles, simply because of clay being more taxing to the body than grass or hard. There are way more rallies are played on clay on average.

 

[GabeT]

I agree. Although I believe winning 14 RG titles is harder than winning 14 USO titles, simply because of clay being more taxing to the body than grass or hard. There are way more rallies are played on clay on average.

It’s clearly not harder for Nadal, for him winning the other slams is harder

 

[mehdimike]

It’s clearly not harder for Nadal, for him winning the other slams is harder

No, because he is much much better on clay than any other alive/dead mankind on another surface.
On the other hand, the chances of facing an upset is higher on grass/hard. I didn't consider that.