D
Deleted member 748597
Guest
The tour and touch on individual players. Also, out of 10 for best performances for each Slam?
D
Deleted member 748597
Guest
I wanna see who inflated his stats the most.
RS
Bionic Poster
AO 17 final - Federer 8.5 , Nadal 8
RG 17 final - Nadal 10 , Stan 4.5
Wim 17 final - Federer 9 , Cllic 3
USO 17 final - Nadal 9 , Anderson 4.5
AO 18 final - Federer 8 , Cllic 6.5
RG 18 final - Nadal 8.5 , Thiem 5
Wim 18 final - Djokovic 9 , Anderson 4
USO 18 final - Djokovic 8.5 , Del Potro 6
AO 19 final - Djokovic 10 , Nadal 4.5
RG 19 final - Nadal 9 , Thiem 6.5
Wim 19 final - Djokovic 7.5 , Federer 7.5
USO 19 final - Nadal 8 , Med 7.5
That’s to help promote this thread
RG 17 final - Nadal 10 , Stan 4.5
Wim 17 final - Federer 9 , Cllic 3
USO 17 final - Nadal 9 , Anderson 4.5
AO 18 final - Federer 8 , Cllic 6.5
RG 18 final - Nadal 8.5 , Thiem 5
Wim 18 final - Djokovic 9 , Anderson 4
USO 18 final - Djokovic 8.5 , Del Potro 6
AO 19 final - Djokovic 10 , Nadal 4.5
RG 19 final - Nadal 9 , Thiem 6.5
Wim 19 final - Djokovic 7.5 , Federer 7.5
USO 19 final - Nadal 8 , Med 7.5
That’s to help promote this thread
Doctor/Lawyer Red Devil
Talk Tennis Guru
2017 AO and those couple of Cilic Opens are not inflation Slams. But those that came after are not only that, but they have made me concerned for the future of tennis.
Rafa4LifeEver
G.O.A.T.
Your avatar made me blink for a moment
mike danny
Bionic Poster
Probably Nadal inflated his stats since he had to beat the weakest competition of the 3.
Federer the most unlucky. Djokodal were winning easy slams after easy slams and Fed was forced to beat both of them at 38 to win Wimb. Unfair.
Federer the most unlucky. Djokodal were winning easy slams after easy slams and Fed was forced to beat both of them at 38 to win Wimb. Unfair.
D
Deleted member 748597
Guest
Not just the Slam finals though. For example, we can't ignore the Wimb 2018 SF.AO 17 final - Federer 8.5 , Nadal 8
RG 17 final - Nadal 10 , Stan 4.5
Wim 17 final - Federer 9 , Cllic 3
USO 17 final - Nadal 9 , Anderson 4.5
AO 18 final - Federer 8 , Cllic 6.5
RG 18 final - Nadal 8.5 , Thiem 5
Wim 18 final - Djokovic 9 , Anderson 4
USO 18 final - Djokovic 8.5 , Del Potro 6
AO 19 final - Djokovic 10 , Nadal 4.5
RG 19 final - Nadal 9 , Thiem 6.5
Wim 19 final - Djokovic 7.5 , Federer 7.5
USO 19 final - Nadal 8 , Med 7.5
That’s to help promote this thread
RS
Bionic Poster
Lol good luck finding people who will rate
Rafa4LifeEver
G.O.A.T.
Come on gentlemen, this is getting ridiculous nowLol good luck finding people who will rate
RS
Bionic Poster
This had nothing to do with me.
StrongRule
Talk Tennis Guru
We have a new trolling avatar on this forum.
D
Deleted member 748597
Guest
Out of 10 for two or three best performances for each Slam?
NoleIsBoat
Hall of Fame
2019 > 2018 >>>>>>>>>> 2017 (weakest year since 2006)
MeatTornado
Talk Tennis Guru
2018 was barely better than 2017, if at all.
They were both really unmemorable seasons outside of Federer/Nadal AO 17 and Djokovic/Nadal Wim 18.
D
Deleted member 748597
Guest
The weakest Slams in 2017-19?
StrongRule
Talk Tennis Guru
Nadal also won a 10th RG in 2017, pretty sure that was also a special moment. Especially given that he didn't win any slams for 3 years before that.
D
Deleted member 688153
Guest
imo Dal padded it out the most in those years. added 2-3 slams without breaking a sweat vs real titans of the game like thiem
um
and the covid slams were a bit of a joke too. but what can you do? this isn't the first time a player has lucked out. fed played balaclava that one time and also cilic
um
and the covid slams were a bit of a joke too. but what can you do? this isn't the first time a player has lucked out. fed played balaclava that one time and also cilic
D
Deleted member 748597
Guest
Then why is mostly Djokovic criticized for inflating his stats?
D
Deleted member 688153
Guest
I think it started cos he racked em up quickly in 15-16, and cos fedr and dal were kinda old then. But he at least played them for most of his titles which should be good enough for anyone sensible. you can only play who's in front of you so i hate weak era talk but come on even a weak era nut should see its rough to criticize someone for beating any version of federer for a title
D
Deleted member 688153
Guest
if you had to beat peak fedr to have a legit win, there'd be like three legit wins. it's dumb, every win is "legit"
MeatTornado
Talk Tennis Guru
But it was an objectively boring steamroll. Memorable and satisfying for Nadal fans, but not really good for tennis. Same reason I didn't bring up Roger finally regaining his Wimbledon crown and doing it in straight sets for the first time. Or even Novak actually winning the title in 2018, the semi-final was the big deal there.
RS
Bionic Poster
Can always mix it up with new threads and try tagging posters in it.
D
Deleted member 748597
Guest
The strongest year?
Similar threads
