Sir Shankalot
Rookie
Hi,
I would appreciate any guidance and opinions here.
I have been playing with the Dunlop Biomimetic 200 for a couple of years now and just love the racquet. I string it with Touna BHBR at 42/40, and own two frames.
A bit of background: prior to using the Dunlops I used to play with the Wilson BLX 6.1 95, also strung with poly. Very similar in spec to the Bio 200 apart from stiffness - the Wilson is rated as 65, as against the Dunlop at 57 according to the TW specs. Basically, when I was using the Wilson I suffered from pretty bad episodes of TE, and when I switched to the Dunlop this went away. I have never had any TE since, even though I string with full bed poly. So it seems very likely that racquet stiffness is, for me at least, a very big deal.
Now, the other day I unfortunately managed to crack the hoop of one of my Dunlop frames, so I am now down to one racquet. I checked on TW and see that the Bio 200 is now out of production and has been replaced with the Bio F2.0 Tour, which has a stiffness rating of 67. 67!!!!!. The M2.0 is even worse, at 70. Thanks, but no thanks. Well done Dunlop, you've just lost a customer.
I don't want to change racquets but unfortunately Dunlop have left me with no alternative. I played around with the racquet finder tool on TW and the closest alternative I can see, in terms of spec, is the Prince EXO3 Rebel 95 which looks to be the closest alternative to the Bio 200 in terms of headsize, balance, weight, swingweight, and (crucially) flex.
Does anyone here have any experience of hitting with both frames, the Bio 200 and the Rebel 95? How similar are they? Any other suggestions for getting something very close to my beloved Dunlop?
Unfortunately playtesting is not an option for me. I live in Kenya and to buy a racquet I have to wait for a friend to travel to the UK and then bring it back for me.
Would appreciate any input and advice.
I would appreciate any guidance and opinions here.
I have been playing with the Dunlop Biomimetic 200 for a couple of years now and just love the racquet. I string it with Touna BHBR at 42/40, and own two frames.
A bit of background: prior to using the Dunlops I used to play with the Wilson BLX 6.1 95, also strung with poly. Very similar in spec to the Bio 200 apart from stiffness - the Wilson is rated as 65, as against the Dunlop at 57 according to the TW specs. Basically, when I was using the Wilson I suffered from pretty bad episodes of TE, and when I switched to the Dunlop this went away. I have never had any TE since, even though I string with full bed poly. So it seems very likely that racquet stiffness is, for me at least, a very big deal.
Now, the other day I unfortunately managed to crack the hoop of one of my Dunlop frames, so I am now down to one racquet. I checked on TW and see that the Bio 200 is now out of production and has been replaced with the Bio F2.0 Tour, which has a stiffness rating of 67. 67!!!!!. The M2.0 is even worse, at 70. Thanks, but no thanks. Well done Dunlop, you've just lost a customer.
I don't want to change racquets but unfortunately Dunlop have left me with no alternative. I played around with the racquet finder tool on TW and the closest alternative I can see, in terms of spec, is the Prince EXO3 Rebel 95 which looks to be the closest alternative to the Bio 200 in terms of headsize, balance, weight, swingweight, and (crucially) flex.
Does anyone here have any experience of hitting with both frames, the Bio 200 and the Rebel 95? How similar are they? Any other suggestions for getting something very close to my beloved Dunlop?
Unfortunately playtesting is not an option for me. I live in Kenya and to buy a racquet I have to wait for a friend to travel to the UK and then bring it back for me.
Would appreciate any input and advice.