Big 3 Slam Percentages

[Spencer Gore]

Here is the current state of play among the Big 3 after the 2019 Roland-Garros tournament.

Percentage of slam tournaments entered and won by the Big 3.

1. Rafa Nadal 32.1%
2= Roger Federer 26.3%
2=Novak Djokovic 26.3%

Comparison to Previous Greats

All Time
(All slams including Pro Slams)
1. 40.7% Bjorn Borg
2. 39.5% Pancho Gonzales
3. 35.7% Don Budge
4. 34.5% Rod Laver
5= 33.3% Bill Tilden
5= 33.3% Ken Rosewall
7. 32.1% Rafa Nadal
8. 30.3% Fred Perry
9. 26.9% Pete Sampras
10= 26.3% Roger Federer
10= 26.3% Novak Djokovic

All-Time
(Traditional Slams)
1. 54.4% Don Budge
2. 43.5% Bill Tilden
3. 40.7% Bjorn Borg
4. 36.3% Fred Perry
5. 32.1% Rafa Nadal
6. 27.5% Rod Laver
7. 26.9% Pete Sampras
8 =26.3% Roger Federer
8= 26.3% Novak Djokovic
10. 19.04% Ken Rosewall

 

[Username_]

Lew III has made a debut.

 

[Backspin1183]

Wait a minute, that's not a big 3 stats. You have so many other names there.

Misleading thread title. Reported.

 

[Spencer Gore]

Wait a minute, that's not a big 3 stats. You have so many other names there.

Misleading thread title. Reported.

Do factual posts frighten you?

I have posted the stats for the Big 3. Right at the top of the post. And I've helped put them in context by comparing them to the all time stats.

Tennis has a long and glorious history and the Big 3 are a big part of that. Their achievements should always be put in context.

 

[Raining hopes]

Do factual posts frighten you?

I have posted the stats for the Big 3. Right at the top of the post. And I've helped put them in context by comparing them to the all time stats.

Tennis has a long and glorious history and the Big 3 are a big part of that. Their achievements should always be put in context.

Dude, let go. Your gimmick became stale months ago.

Just try to enjoy Nadal's 18th.

 

[Spencer Gore]

Dude, let go. Your gimmick became stale months ago.

Just try to enjoy Nadal's 18th.

Since when did objective facts become a "gimmick"?

 

[Raining hopes]

Since when did objective facts become a "gimmick"?

Just about when you stopped replying to objective facts that didn't fit in your agenda.

Where were you when I posted "objective facts " against your previous claims just a thread or two ago? Yep no replies. See I am not being condescending, just pointing out that people should stop falling for your trolling.

.

 

[BadBoy666]

This thread simply points out that the big 3 stats are in fact inflated due to more slam attempts.

 

[Towny]

Conflating Open era majors with Pro championships and Amateur era majors is not exactly going to yield useful conclusions. The achievements are not equivalent. Just about the only useful information gleaned from these stats outside of Big 3 direct comparisons is just how incredible Borg's consistency and dominance at the slams was

 

[Spencer Gore]

Just about when you stopped replying to objective facts that didn't fit in your agenda.

Where were you when I posted "objective facts " against your previous claims just a thread or two ago? Yep no replies. See I am not being condescending, just pointing out that people should stop falling for your trolling.

.

You didn't post any objective facts.

The post at the top of this thread is objective facts.

 

[mahesh69a]

Are you a duplicate account for Lew? ... that one also has this obsession with 'objective facts' although he/she is more detailed.

 

[TheAssassin]

Imagine if the Nadal didn't lose those 15 Slams or more. The percentage would have sky rocketed.

 

[Raining hopes]

You didn't post any objective facts.

The post at the top of this thread is objective facts.

Nah you and only you know which facts are objective which are not.

See , Rafa won. He is once in a lifetime player and is very close to being accepted as The GOAT. You should try enjoying that even if you are only a Federer hater and not a Rafa fan.

 

[Spencer Gore]

Nah you and only you know which facts are objective which are not.

See , Rafa won. He is once in a lifetime player and is very close to being accepted as The GOAT. You should try enjoying that even if you are only a Federer hater and not a Rafa fan.

The stats don't care for your personal feelings about Roger Federer or Rafa Nadal. Or mine. They are objective facts about the percentage of slams won compared to slams entered.

Analysis of the stats is where subjectivity comes into the equation.