Bukmeikara
Legend
As for now Fed has 89 wins at Wimbledon and if he wins the title on Sunday, 91. It seems very likely that he would reach 100 if he participates for another 2-3 years! IMO 90-10 to happen
Nadal is 79 at RG and its quite the task. I mean, lets say he has another title in him next year - 86, he needs another 14 wins which are probably at least an additional 3 years. So he needs to play till 35-36 in order to reach the number. Id say its doable .. maybe 60-40 in favor
Djokovic is 62 wins at Us Open. I expect him to play till a late age, something like 37-38 and he would probably, like Connors, reach plenty of QF-SF. So he needs another 38 wins for lets say another 8 years, on average a QF ?! Once you write it down suddenly is not that likely
Still its Novak and everything is possible but IMO he needs at least two more titles there in order to have a chance to reach 100. 20-80
Murray is with 57 wins at Wimbledon. He needs to play till 38 just to have a remote chance! Given his recent missgivings and interviews, its seems very, very unlikely. But lets consider it, this year is a proof that if he enters the draw he would give his absolute best. I expect him to reach R16 on average, 8x3 which means .. 81 wins He needs like 5 finals in that period. IMO 2-98, its not 1% just because Andy is an ATG
No one is yet reached 100 wins at any Slam. Closest is Jimmy Connors with 98 at the Us Open! (EDIT: I sure hope so Andy Murray doesnt see this sentence )
Nadal is 79 at RG and its quite the task. I mean, lets say he has another title in him next year - 86, he needs another 14 wins which are probably at least an additional 3 years. So he needs to play till 35-36 in order to reach the number. Id say its doable .. maybe 60-40 in favor
Djokovic is 62 wins at Us Open. I expect him to play till a late age, something like 37-38 and he would probably, like Connors, reach plenty of QF-SF. So he needs another 38 wins for lets say another 8 years, on average a QF ?! Once you write it down suddenly is not that likely
Still its Novak and everything is possible but IMO he needs at least two more titles there in order to have a chance to reach 100. 20-80Murray is with 57 wins at Wimbledon. He needs to play till 38 just to have a remote chance! Given his recent missgivings and interviews, its seems very, very unlikely. But lets consider it, this year is a proof that if he enters the draw he would give his absolute best. I expect him to reach R16 on average, 8x3 which means .. 81 wins
He needs like 5 finals in that period. IMO 2-98, its not 1% just because Andy is an ATGNo one is yet reached 100 wins at any Slam. Closest is Jimmy Connors with 98 at the Us Open! (EDIT: I sure hope so Andy Murray doesnt see this sentence
)
Last edited:
