that's what I mean, how can they wriggle out of this idiotic, useless, and forced obligation, while avoiding the fine?They get fined if they don't participate.
tacou summed it up perfectly.The dumbest part is that the media never ask real questions.
lol, yeah, it's obvious that alot of media doesn't actually play sports... perhaps that's why they got into journalism, to write about the things they wish they could do.They get fined if they don't participate. The dumbest part is that the media never ask real questions.
Mixed emotions: yes, it is a silly exercise. But....The whole mandatory aspect of it really doesn't sit well with me at all.
Well that is the obvious flaw to call out. But spectators are just that. Spectators. You'd claim you have a way of psychologically blocking them out and just focusing on the match.Your ‘anxiety disorder’ excuse is pretty weak - so one is to believe they can perform with millions watching but can’t answer a few questions?
F*ck them. They get the right to show the tennis on their tv station, and make bank from advertisers and payTV subscribers. That's good enough. The players aren't their slaves, or their dancing monkeys.And don’t forget - TV pays most of the bills so they have to be granted some latitude.
The money wouldn't go away at all, viewers would still tune in in the same numbers they always do, and TV stations would make the same money off payTV and advertisers as they already are.How would the player’s ‘anxiety’ be affected if TV went away and the players made so little they had to get other jobs? And you can just hit mute or not watch the presentatio
If the player's opinions are so important, well we live in the age of internet and social media, each player could be required to make a post match statement on their instagram or answer questions on that, in their own time once they have recovered, and giving them the opportunity to defend themselves from provocative questions by ignoring them, or just having their PR team make the posts and give the media the verbiage they need to make their "news" out of.@tacou nailed it - just have some canned answers to rattle off. Not a big deal.
The players aren't their slaves, or their dancing monkeys.
...but the players aren't known for their eloquence...
No, a player who refuses interviews would be dumber than a dancing monkey. Sponsors don't want irritable players who avoid the public representing their products, so a player is only hurting himself in the wallet if he dodges interviews. When Donald Dell was Lendl's business manager, he told Lendl that his irritable avoidant manner was costing him millions in endorsements.
There's only ever been one Ivan Lendl. And players represent their sponsors on court, and winning seems to gloss over nearly any bad behaviour.
Further, if I were a sponsor, I wouldn't want, say Bernard Tomic, to do an interview. Just let him do his talking on the court, and let his PR team make his statements post match, and no negative publicity to worry about. It's the hostile ambush interviews where players are staked down at the mercy of these worthless journalistic hyenas that all the problems seem to arise in the first place.
Also, you can't appear "irritable" in an interview if you don't do one, but instead do a social media statement post match and field questions that your PR team can sieve to weed out deliberately provocative journalistic trolling.
Look at the time Nadal bit that ballkid on the face, climbed onto the roof at the AO, and had to be shot with that tranquilizer gun, that didn't cost him his contract with Nike at all, Nike just paid the medical and legal bills, and hushed it all up. My mate Dave was there, and saw it happen.
Hmm. So, your mate is also making up stories about Nadal.
I understand it's an entertainment business but the players aren't known for their eloquence and their eloquence isn't what's earning them the money in the first place.
For me they owe ticket buyers, sponsors, TV broadcasters and the ATP a good performance on the court but that's where it ends.
Did he say that?Federer:
“Regardless of whether I won or lost in Halle I will be one of the favourites at Wimbledon.”
Classic.
hmm, the full quote doesn't include context, sounds like he could be just saying he feels pressured
He does feel pressure for sure. Still a hint of Arro-ganterer which is a good thing. He can't lose that or it's all over.hmm, the full quote doesn't include context, sounds like he could be just saying he feels pressured
Was he the bloke who told Lendl to wear those spray on shorts? My mother still recalls Lendl was told by his agency to wear spray on shorts to bring more interest into the game as he was considered boring.No, a player who refuses interviews would be dumber than a dancing monkey. Sponsors don't want irritable players who avoid the public representing their products, so a player is only hurting himself in the wallet if he dodges interviews. When Donald Dell was Lendl's business manager, he told Lendl that his irritable avoidant manner was costing him millions in endorsements.
RoddickWouldn't it be refreshing to hear someone just say, "It sucks man, it REALLY SUCKS!"