Artificial Grass
Rookie
Since grass is never going to get a Masters in the foreseeable future (let's face it), can we all as members of the tennis community just agree that, for all intents and purposes, Queens and Halle are de facto Masters 1000s? Wouldn't a rose by any other name smell as sweet?
Sure this is part tongue in cheek, but I really feel like those two tournaments should basically carry as much weight as other Masters tournaments when we're comparing career achievements, etc. Can't it just be like an unwritten rule within the tennis community? Ultimately we are the ones who make the rules. At least when it comes to determining a player's legacy.
So here's to grasping at straws...who's with me?!
Sure this is part tongue in cheek, but I really feel like those two tournaments should basically carry as much weight as other Masters tournaments when we're comparing career achievements, etc. Can't it just be like an unwritten rule within the tennis community? Ultimately we are the ones who make the rules. At least when it comes to determining a player's legacy.
So here's to grasping at straws...who's with me?!