People have been overrating Del Potro a lot since he won the US open, I mean Murray has been the second best player, has been more consistent player in the last one year if we compare him to Del Potro. Del Potro was good for two weeks and congrats on him on winning a slam but he was quite lucky to win this slam lets be honest here.
Murray is still ahead of him in the ranking and in the long run will end up winning more slams than Del Potro.
Lets be
really honest
Murray has been second best this year, only because the true number 2 has been crippled with injury and his rival for number 3 has been a total headcase for the past 12 months.
Murray's success has come of the back of his hard work, not his 'talent'.
When he was another lazy player not working hard on his fitness he was having pretty mediocre results. There were no flashes of brilliance that made people think this guy is going to dominate. The Murray Hype Machine only started when he pulled his finger out and started trying to match Nadal in the fitness department. Murray has been working his ass off and is probably in as good condition as he can be right now, and any gains from now will only be minor and will have little bearing on actual match results.
Murray has been at his peak both Physically and Technically for a while now. He has no obvious weaknesses in his game or his conditioning. For him to break through this grand slam plateau he is going to have to fundamentally change the way he approaches matches tactically. Its not an easy task to make such a change, and I dont think there has ever been a player to win a slam who has managed it by changing their natural way of playing. Hewitt tried to change his style later on in his career and it was disastrous.
When you look at a player like Nadal or Federer in their early years they were already fundamentally the player that they are today. Federer an amazing shot maker, Nadal a tremendous athlete with Borg like Natural stamina and athleticism. Federer's game rose as he began to work harder, Nadal's game rose as he shored up his technical weaknesses.
Murray's obvious attributes were his court craft and his ability to control rally's with placement, spin, change of pace etc, like a male Hingis.
No player has succeeded with that kind of style since Wilander, and he was so mentally burned out he never won a slam after his career year, and there are no GOAT contenders who played like that besides Rosewall.
Murray might win 1, 2 or maybe 3 slams in his career
if he is lucky.
If he manages to stay injury free.
If he manages to stay in the kind of shape he is now he will have a chance if he can go through a field where he doesn't encounter a more naturally aggressive player on a hot streak.
Players who work so hard on their fitness however rarely stay at their peak for longer than a couple of years though. Lendl is an exception, since he was a power baseliner rather than a grinder, but look at guys like Courier, Muster or Hewitt. Even guys like Borg and Nadal who were naturally very gifted physically even have trouble maintaining their bodies while playing a grinding style. Borg was mentally burned out at 25 (maybe physically too, who knows?), and Nadal's body is certainly starting to show signs of decline.
If Murray is going to go on a Grand Slam rampage then the clock is ticking, because once his body starts to wear down, we're going to find out just how much 'talent' he really has.
All signs point to Murray
not being an all time great.