This is an interesting question posted in another thread. It's about the silly on-going feud between Fed and Nadal fans, as compared to those during the Sampras-Agassi era. I thought I rather start a new thread on this.frekcles said:What was the message boards like when Pete and Andre were going head to head? Was it as bad as this? I'm just wondering.
I remember things (in this board) were more "civilized" and mature back then. There were many Sampras fans, as well as those who supported Agassi and Rafter. Many of them were genuine fans, who would get into the occasional squabble, but were generally decent and light-hearted in nature. Flame wars was inevitable when things got out of hand, but not as frequent and disruptive as what we have seen today. The average fan was also more level headed. I guess the average age in this board was older then.
Currently, some of the Fed/Nadal fans in this board are just obsessive fanboys. They will go all out just to prove their idol is the best. They will "put down" anyone who doesn't share the same idol-worship as him/her. For example, there's one particular Fed fanboy (you know who you are) who would resort to habitual name-calling in most of his anti-Nadal arguments. Is it so sacrilegious when someone says "Nadal will beat Fed (or vice-versa)" or "Fed/Nadal got no backhand", it instantly demands a rebuttal or name-calling? Get a life, fanboys.
So here's my parting shot. True, you fanboys may love Fed or Nadal to bits and do anything to elevate your hero. But alas, Fed or Nadal doesn't even know who you are (fact #1), less give a **** about you (fact #2).