Differences between the Prince TT95 and TT100P

[max]

Curious about how these two stack up against each other.

Anyone familiar with both? What would work best if your best stroke is the serve?

 

[Lex]

I think it comes down to how much racquet head speed you can generate with the slightly heavier TT95. The TT95 has a more open pattern. Should be able to kick the ball more.

I like the precision of the 100P better. Your results, of course, may vary.

 

[Dartagnan64]

5 square inches.

j/k TT95 likely will be the better serving frame as mids move through the air a bit better than midplus frames and the more open pattern will provide a bit more oomph and spin. But I've not used any Tours for about 4 years.

 

[mhkeuns]

TT100P is a powerful frame. Deceptively so because it doesn’t have the stiffness of the Babolat tweeners and the pop isn’t as dramatic, but it is a powerful, yet control oriented frame. The TT95 is really low powered but comes with excellent feel.

I much prefer the Phantom 93P compared to the TT95 due to all-around better playability. I also feel that TT100P is one of the best 100” racket available in the market for intermediate/advanced players.

 

[tata]

I demoed the first gen tour 100p and really liked it on serve. As the player feedback on that frame goes, 'power on tap'. Not sure about the 2nd gen tour 100p which is now a tad stiffer. But from the review it doesn't sound like a big difference to say it's now overpowering. In an 18x20 it's easy to tweak power with string and tension. Can't comment on the 95 but pretty sure it won't out perform in the power category.

 

[jmacdaununder2]

5 square inches.

j/k TT95 likely will be the better serving frame as mids move through the air a bit better than midplus frames and the more open pattern will provide a bit more oomph and spin. But I've not used any Tours for about 4 years.

Also more leverage.