R. Schweikart
Professional
Sometimes it is claimed that having to play "best of 5" in slams makes Djokovic's successful slam runs even more impressive (esp. compared to the women's greats like Stefanie Graf).
Well, that is obviously not the case.
Djokovic would have 5 slam titles less if he had had to play only Bo3 instead of Bo5.
In the USO 2011 semis he trailed Federer with 0-2 sets.
In the AO 2012 semis he trailed Murray with 1-2 sets.
In the Wimbledon 2015 4th round he trailed Anderson with 0-2 sets.
In the AO 2020 final he trailed Thiem with 1-2 sets.
And in the FO 2021 4th round her trailed Musetti with 0-2 sets and later in the final Tsitsipas also with 0-2 sets.
He also had some losses in slams in which he lead his opponent with 2-1 and still lost; but that was always in the quarters or earlier.
Bo5 is a safeguard for the better players against unwelcome surprises. The women's top players didn't have such luxury. When they lost 2 sets they were out.
Well, that is obviously not the case.
Djokovic would have 5 slam titles less if he had had to play only Bo3 instead of Bo5.
In the USO 2011 semis he trailed Federer with 0-2 sets.
In the AO 2012 semis he trailed Murray with 1-2 sets.
In the Wimbledon 2015 4th round he trailed Anderson with 0-2 sets.
In the AO 2020 final he trailed Thiem with 1-2 sets.
And in the FO 2021 4th round her trailed Musetti with 0-2 sets and later in the final Tsitsipas also with 0-2 sets.
He also had some losses in slams in which he lead his opponent with 2-1 and still lost; but that was always in the quarters or earlier.
Bo5 is a safeguard for the better players against unwelcome surprises. The women's top players didn't have such luxury. When they lost 2 sets they were out.