Does this qualify for free replacement ?

[zacinnc78]

breath free 2's

 

[soggyramen]

oh yeah definately

 

[ThePro101]

I concur ______

 

[zacinnc78]

lol yall sure?I was reading it had to go through into the upper to not just the mid...i dont really know what that means ...and it said exposure of a different color rubber does not qualify.That grayish material dont feel like rubber by the way ...feels more spongy like foam.

 

[Gmedlo]

Wow that qualifies for the warranty? I could do that to BFIIs in under a month, easily.

 

[TheShaun]

that's one of the worst photos i've seen on TT so far...

 

[Milano]

I dont think so... I think the picture quality makes it seem worse than it is. Also the pattern on the BFII is different and makes it look more worn. Seems like only a small portion is actually worn out, the rest seems fine...have any better pics?

 

[desilvam]

you definitely qualify for a free replacement for your digital camera :grin:

 

[zacinnc78]

i definately agree about the pic quality lol...this thing makes huge files,sorry about that lol

 

[jasoncho92]

6 months is way too much for any company if that qualifies for new replacement lol. I do that to my shoes in 2 weeks if im nice to them

 

[zacinnc78]

i definately agree about the pic quality lol...this thing makes huge files,sorry about that lol heres a hopefully marginally better pic

 

[jasoncho92]

My advice is to get the whole shoe in the picture because it doesnt seem like your camera is able to focus properly if you get the camera that close. And we can see the whole shoe

 

[Northpaw]

I would suggest focusing the camera to the shoe, not to the piece of wood behind it. But if that white part that we see is the undersole, then yes, it would probably qualify for a replacement.