Out of principle? Meanwhile Djokovic body served him all day... SMHArticle has good point! Fed has stated that he refuses to serve to the body out of principle. A body jam to Nole on CP could have gotten it for Fed!
Fedr noble to the point of fanbase meltdown. So arrogant.Out of principle? Meanwhile Djokovic body served him all day... SMH
Article has good point! Fed has stated that he refuses to serve to the body out of principle. A body jam to Nole on CP could have gotten it for Fed!
During Wimbledon he said he try to doesn't serve to the body not to give the opponent any ideas of doing the same.What principle is that? I don't get it.
Interesting how Djokovic went to the net more in the TBs (12% of the points in the TB vs 9% of the points in the rest of the match), while Fed's percentage plummeted (16% during the match, and only 4% in the TBs)
He went for a body serve on one of those match points he wasted in New York.Article has good point! Fed has stated that he refuses to serve to the body out of principle. A body jam to Nole on CP could have gotten it for Fed!
Interesting how Djokovic went to the net more in the TBs (12% of the points in the TB vs 9% of the points in the rest of the match), while Fed's percentage plummeted (16% during the match, and only 4% in the TBs)
Out of principle? Meanwhile Djokovic body served him all day... SMH
Right... Some serious analytics going on here. It's hardly some absurd anomaly, especially when one considers the TBs (as is usually the case) took place in sets where both players were quite evenly matched. Take out sets 2 and 4 and it was basically gridlock out there for the most part.People still going on about this.
I don't understand, why is it so unbelievable that the world #1 could win three tiebreaks against the #3?