I would trade one of Nadal's non-clay slams for another Roland Garros

[Incognito]

Yes it's totally Djokovic's fault that he faced Federer or Wawrinka in the SF instead of Berrettini. Totally his fault. He should've given the organizers a better offer than Nadal did. Nadal's USO draws were all a complete joke, I would be embarassed to win the tournament with such draws.

it only proves my point that he's nothing but an opportunist clay courter

damn, the anger towards Nadal.

Rafa must be doing something right lol

 

[Deleted member 762343]

His 7 slam titles are a testament to his greatness outside of clay and reinforce his GOAT/co-GOAT/2nd GOAT status. Taking any of those titles away from him would hurt his case. 10 RG titles in a row would be extremely impressive but it would hardly change anything as his godly level on clay is already acknowledged by everyone, especially because of his ridiculously high win/loss ratio at RG. We already know he's so ridiculously good that he could have done it, so actually doing it wouldn't have had as much of an impact as each of his non clay slam titles has in regards to his legacy.

 

[MichaelNadal]

damn, the anger towards Nadal.

Rafa must be doing something right lol

Doing a lot right

 

[Daniel Andrade]

Yes, 1 US open.

 

[BackhandDTL]

I would trade every slam for the FO.

**** it, go all in

 

[blablavla]

Dude you have no idea what you're talking about. Anyone who doesn't go with the main covid narrative is either ridiculed or crushed like a bug. I know what I know and will just wait this craze out.

dude, you don't go with "main narrative", and this is a public place.
were you "crushed like a bug"?
or perhaps some of other notorious posters on this board that follow the same anti "main narrative" were "crushed like a bug"?

you do realize that if you are not some kind of a top hacker, then you leave enough digital marks for someone to find you and "crush like a bug"?
point at which your theory kind of flops