Masters 250
- Thread starter KG1965
- Start date
BORG (16) - only ATP sanctioned
1974 Auckland
1974 Adelaide
1975 Richmond
1975 Bologna
1976 Toronto
1976 San Paolo
1976 Dusseldof
1977 Nice
1977 Basel
1977 Cologne
1978 Baastad
1979 Baastad
1979 Palermo
1980 Nice
1981 Stuttgart
1981 Geneva
64 Titles - 16 Masters 250 = 48 Titles > Masters 250
1974 Auckland
1974 Adelaide
1975 Richmond
1975 Bologna
1976 Toronto
1976 San Paolo
1976 Dusseldof
1977 Nice
1977 Basel
1977 Cologne
1978 Baastad
1979 Baastad
1979 Palermo
1980 Nice
1981 Stuttgart
1981 Geneva
64 Titles - 16 Masters 250 = 48 Titles > Masters 250
Last edited:
USOPEN1991
Rookie
As the Federer fans but again say that he has to compete in smaller tournaments, in order to maintain its international status and cut not only the raisins from the cake ... of course, also applies to Connors. However, this needed smaller tournaments to earn points for the world rankings, which he could not collect in Melbourne or Paris, was allowed or wanted ...
N
Navdeep Srivastava
Guest
Queens was 250, ofcourse field was strong like Dubai, but it was rated 250.
So count queen as 250 till 2014, from 2015 onwards it become atp 500.
So count queen as 250 till 2014, from 2015 onwards it become atp 500.
Im(moral) Winner
G.O.A.T.
You mean ATP 250
CONNORS (40) - only ATP sanctioned
1972 Jacksonville
1972 Roanoke
1972 Queen's
1972 Columbus
1972 Albany
1972 Cincinnati
1973 Baltimore
1973 Roanoke
1973 Salt Lake City
1973 Salisbury
1973 Hampton
1973 Paramus
1973 Columbus
1974 Roanoke
1974 North Little Rock
1974 Birmingham
1974 Salisbury
1974 Hampton
1974 Salt Lake City
1974 Tempe
1974 Manchester
1975 Nassau (Bahamas)
1975 Denver
1975 Birmingham
1975 Salisbury
1975 Hampton
1975 Boca Raton
1975 Hamilton (Bermuda)
1975 Maui (Hawaaii)
1976 Birmingham
1976 Hampton
1976 Cologne
1976 Denver
1978 Stowe
1979 Hong Kong
1979 Stowe
1979 Tulsa
1980 Canton (China)
1982 Columbus
1989 Tel Aviv
109 Titles - 40 Masters 250 = 69 Titles > Masters 250
1972 Jacksonville
1972 Roanoke
1972 Queen's
1972 Columbus
1972 Albany
1972 Cincinnati
1973 Baltimore
1973 Roanoke
1973 Salt Lake City
1973 Salisbury
1973 Hampton
1973 Paramus
1973 Columbus
1974 Roanoke
1974 North Little Rock
1974 Birmingham
1974 Salisbury
1974 Hampton
1974 Salt Lake City
1974 Tempe
1974 Manchester
1975 Nassau (Bahamas)
1975 Denver
1975 Birmingham
1975 Salisbury
1975 Hampton
1975 Boca Raton
1975 Hamilton (Bermuda)
1975 Maui (Hawaaii)
1976 Birmingham
1976 Hampton
1976 Cologne
1976 Denver
1978 Stowe
1979 Hong Kong
1979 Stowe
1979 Tulsa
1980 Canton (China)
1982 Columbus
1989 Tel Aviv
109 Titles - 40 Masters 250 = 69 Titles > Masters 250
Last edited:
LENDL (23) - only ATP sanctioned
1980 Basel
1980 Hong Kong
1980 Taipei
1981 Stuttgart
1981 Madrid
1981 Basel
1981 Wien
1982 Cologne
1982 WCT Delray Beach
1982 WCT Genova
1982 WCT Munich
1982 WCT Strasbourg
1982 WCT Houston
1982 WCT Los Angeles
1982 WCT Naples
1982 WCT Hartford
1983 WCT Detroit
1983 WCT Houston
1983 WCT Hilton Head
1985 Stuttgart
1989 Bordeaux
1991 Long Island
1993 Munich
94 Titles - 23 Masters 250 = 71 Titles > Masters 250
1980 Basel
1980 Hong Kong
1980 Taipei
1981 Stuttgart
1981 Madrid
1981 Basel
1981 Wien
1982 Cologne
1982 WCT Delray Beach
1982 WCT Genova
1982 WCT Munich
1982 WCT Strasbourg
1982 WCT Houston
1982 WCT Los Angeles
1982 WCT Naples
1982 WCT Hartford
1983 WCT Detroit
1983 WCT Houston
1983 WCT Hilton Head
1985 Stuttgart
1989 Bordeaux
1991 Long Island
1993 Munich
94 Titles - 23 Masters 250 = 71 Titles > Masters 250
Last edited:
I believe it is important to note that the Masters 250 of
- Fedr are distributed more over the years,
- Lendl are to a large extent in the years 1982-83 when he won many WCT tournaments, rich but out of ATP ranking and with poor opponents,
- Connors since 1976 at the end of their career are a small number (it is about 17% of Borg) while from 1972 to 1975 the american wins a very high number of poor tournaments.
In the ranking of "All singles titles" Connors, Federer and Lendl have benefited from the others by winning many low-level tournaments.
The distance between them and McEnroe, Nadal, Djokovic is actually very small.
Sampras and Borg come later but they are also closer.
The distance between them and McEnroe, Nadal, Djokovic is actually very small.
Sampras and Borg come later but they are also closer.
Last edited:
USOPEN1991
Rookie
That is the difference. I would never publish a statistic in which Jimmy Connors is presented in a negative way.
And maybe even enjoy Federer fans. Bad enough.
And that does not have to be. Every little tournament has to be won first. Maybe there will not be so many big tournaments to win in one year !?
Last edited:
hoodjem
G.O.A.T.
Last edited:
But it is wrong. Deeply wrong.
I produce little lately; I know that other posters are working on it.
hoodjem
G.O.A.T.
Awaiting are we!I produce little lately; I know that other posters are working on it.
