Bjorn Borg beat Vitas Gerulaitis 6-1, 5-7, 6-1 in the Boca Raton final, 1980 on green clay
It was Borg’s 4th title in a row at the event and Gerulaitis’ only final. John McEnroe (who had lost to Gerulaitis in the semi) beat Guillermo Vilas in the third place play-off
Borg won 98 points, Gerulaitis 73
Gerulaitis serve-volleyed of all but 4 first serves
Serve Stats
Borg...
- 1st serve percentage (47/75) 63%
- 1st serve points won (30/47) 64%
- 2nd serve points won (19/28) 68%
- Aces 2
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (8/75) 11%
Gerulaitis...
- 1st serve percentage (52/96) 54%
- 1st serve points won (31/52) 60%
- 2nd serve points won (16/44) 36%
- Double Faults 7
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (14/96) 15%
Serve Patterns
Borg served...
- to FH 55%
- to BH 41%
- to Body 4%
Gerulaitis served...
- to FH 25%
- to BH 65%
- to Body 10%
Return Stats
Borg made...
- 75 (40 FH, 35 BH), including 16 runaround FHs
- 1 Winner (1 BH)
- 14 Errors, comprising...
- 2 Unforced (2 FH), including 1 runaround FH
- 12 Forced (2 FH, 10 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- Return Rate (75/89) 84%
Gerulaitis made...
- 66 (43 FH, 23 BH), including 6 runaround FHs & 10 return-approaches
- 6 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (4 FH), including 1 runaround FH
- 2 Forced (1 FH, 1 BH)
- Return Rate (66/74) 89%
Break Points
Borg 7/13 (8 games)
Gerulaitis 3/8 (4 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Borg 30 (16 FH, 10 BH, 1 BHV, 3 OH)
Gerulaitis 25 (2 FH, 2 BH, 8 FHV, 8 BHV, 4 OH, 1 BHOH)
Borg had 22 passes (12 FH, 10 BH)
- FHs - 7 cc, 3 dtl (1 at net), 1 inside-out and 1 lob
- BHs - 3 cc, 4 dt (1 net chord pop over), 1 inside-in pass and 2 lobs
- regular FHs - 1 cc, 1 cc/inside-in, 1 inside-in and 1 longline (with Gerulaitis on the floor)
Gerulaitis had 11 from serve-volley points -
- 5 first volleys (2 FHV, 2 BHV, 1 OH)
- 5 second volleys (3 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
- 1 third volley (1 BHV)
- 1 from 1 return-approach point, an OH
- 1 other BHV was a non-net shot and the BHOH was a drop
- FHs - 2 cc (1 pass)
- BH passes - 2 dtl
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Borg 33
- 12 Unforced (10 FH, 2 BH)… with 1 FH pass attempt
- 21 Forced (8 FH, 11 BH, 1 FH1/2V, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.5
Gerulaitis 53
- 38 Unforced (16 FH, 11 BH, 6 FHV, 4 BHV, 1 OH)… with 1 FH at net
- 15 Forced (4 FH, 4 BH, 2 FHV, 4 BHV, 1 BHOH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.1
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Borg was...
- 13/22 (59%) at net, with...
- 1/3 (33%) forced back
Gerulaitis was...
- 52/94 (55%) at net, including...
- 33/51 (65%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 31/48 (65%) off 1st serve and...
- 2/3 (67%) off 2nd serve
---
- 4/10 (40%) return-approaching
- 1/3 (33%) forced back/retreated
Match Report
Predictable result aside, an interesting match with Gerulaitis trying out some unusual things - ‘junking’ and drawing Borg to net. It disrupts Borg enough for him to drop a set, which would be a ‘win’ for his opponent
What makes winning a set even more of a ‘win’ is that Vitas doesn’t play well. He serve-volleys virtually always off first serves (stays back on 4, loses all of them). Serve isn’t very strong and wouldn’t be a surprise to see Borg strike return-pass winners regularly (which ends up not happening)
Vitas is a poor 15/33 rallying to net - and every reason for that to be, is. He comes in off some weak approach shots, he misses easy volleys (12 UEs in forecourt), he doesn’t place volleys well (good lot where Borg can reach them easily) - and Borg returns extremely well (with Vitas’ approaches and volleys and even serve giving him pretty good looks at the pass)
Not too bad from Vitas off the ground (again, relatively speaking, considering his opponent and the surface)
Ground UEs - Vitas 26, Borg 11 (excluding net shots and pass attempts)
Neutral UEs - Vitas 19, Borg 5
Why is that ‘not too bad’? Well, the rallies go on for awhile most of the time before Vitas blinks. He’s able to move Borg around some, or have him fall way behind the baseline with depth. Players like John Newcombe, Arthur Ashe and even Rod Laver have done worse - and in much shorter rallies than Vitas
(When the above constitutes ‘not too bad’, you know the guy is in serious trouble)
So from Vitas’ point of view -
- serve-volleying regularly behind not a strong serve (does well, winning 65%. Wouldn’t have been a surprise if it were 50% or under with the strenght of serve he shows)
- getting short end of stick rallying from the back (as expected, and it being mitigated by rallies not being short is un-essential)
- getting stiffed rallying to net
From Borg’s point of view
- outlasting Vitas from the back
- passing Vitas regularly
Sounds like a typical Borg clay showing, a 2 & 3 affair
Yet Vitas pinches a set. In first set, he flirts a bit with drawing Borg in with deliberate, short groundies. In second set, executes it more thoroughly
Its not out-and-out junking, a’le Orantes ‘75 US Open final. About 50% extra ‘junk’ added to Vitas regular baseline game (which isn’t junk free to begin with). No pace balls, softer shots, shorter balls with little pace tempting Borg in. He stays pretty consistent doing all this
And it works. Borg’s metronomic groundstroke rhythm is disrupted. He doesn’t like moving forward, and doesn’t deal too well with the pseudo-drop shots. Quick as he is, Borg reaches a little behind the service line in time that he can hit a top spin shot (as opposed to a delicate run-down-drop-shot shot)
Going for a winner from this position would be normal. He plays ‘approach shots’ (he’s all but at net already) instead. Or tries to, missing a small number. Or he retreats to baseline after hitting the balls. If he’s stuck at net, Vitas tries lobbing him
There’s not too much of that going on, but Borg isn’t convincing in putting those away either. And again, when having back-pedalled some to make the OHs, is is 2 minds to fall back or move in again
The whole dynamic is similar to what Vitas would do later in the year at the French Open final. Less systematic - its about 50% added to his usual game - than that
It seems to work beyond just action too, and reach into Borg’s head. He loses the set in, what for him, is a flurry of groundstroke aggression. Dropping the loopy shots, he goes for flatter, harder hit beat-down type hitting near end of set, while also seeking net. Misses a bunch of those to lose
Bloody good from Vitas. A lot better than getting passed every which way coming in and being bled out from the back against the sliding wall. Would not expect it to keep working for very long
As is, we don’t find out. For reasons best known to himself, Vitas drops all that and reverts to orthodox ground play in third set. And gets creamed - game, set, match, $150,000 Borg
It was Borg’s 4th title in a row at the event and Gerulaitis’ only final. John McEnroe (who had lost to Gerulaitis in the semi) beat Guillermo Vilas in the third place play-off
Borg won 98 points, Gerulaitis 73
Gerulaitis serve-volleyed of all but 4 first serves
Serve Stats
Borg...
- 1st serve percentage (47/75) 63%
- 1st serve points won (30/47) 64%
- 2nd serve points won (19/28) 68%
- Aces 2
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (8/75) 11%
Gerulaitis...
- 1st serve percentage (52/96) 54%
- 1st serve points won (31/52) 60%
- 2nd serve points won (16/44) 36%
- Double Faults 7
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (14/96) 15%
Serve Patterns
Borg served...
- to FH 55%
- to BH 41%
- to Body 4%
Gerulaitis served...
- to FH 25%
- to BH 65%
- to Body 10%
Return Stats
Borg made...
- 75 (40 FH, 35 BH), including 16 runaround FHs
- 1 Winner (1 BH)
- 14 Errors, comprising...
- 2 Unforced (2 FH), including 1 runaround FH
- 12 Forced (2 FH, 10 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- Return Rate (75/89) 84%
Gerulaitis made...
- 66 (43 FH, 23 BH), including 6 runaround FHs & 10 return-approaches
- 6 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (4 FH), including 1 runaround FH
- 2 Forced (1 FH, 1 BH)
- Return Rate (66/74) 89%
Break Points
Borg 7/13 (8 games)
Gerulaitis 3/8 (4 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Borg 30 (16 FH, 10 BH, 1 BHV, 3 OH)
Gerulaitis 25 (2 FH, 2 BH, 8 FHV, 8 BHV, 4 OH, 1 BHOH)
Borg had 22 passes (12 FH, 10 BH)
- FHs - 7 cc, 3 dtl (1 at net), 1 inside-out and 1 lob
- BHs - 3 cc, 4 dt (1 net chord pop over), 1 inside-in pass and 2 lobs
- regular FHs - 1 cc, 1 cc/inside-in, 1 inside-in and 1 longline (with Gerulaitis on the floor)
Gerulaitis had 11 from serve-volley points -
- 5 first volleys (2 FHV, 2 BHV, 1 OH)
- 5 second volleys (3 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
- 1 third volley (1 BHV)
- 1 from 1 return-approach point, an OH
- 1 other BHV was a non-net shot and the BHOH was a drop
- FHs - 2 cc (1 pass)
- BH passes - 2 dtl
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Borg 33
- 12 Unforced (10 FH, 2 BH)… with 1 FH pass attempt
- 21 Forced (8 FH, 11 BH, 1 FH1/2V, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.5
Gerulaitis 53
- 38 Unforced (16 FH, 11 BH, 6 FHV, 4 BHV, 1 OH)… with 1 FH at net
- 15 Forced (4 FH, 4 BH, 2 FHV, 4 BHV, 1 BHOH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.1
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Borg was...
- 13/22 (59%) at net, with...
- 1/3 (33%) forced back
Gerulaitis was...
- 52/94 (55%) at net, including...
- 33/51 (65%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 31/48 (65%) off 1st serve and...
- 2/3 (67%) off 2nd serve
---
- 4/10 (40%) return-approaching
- 1/3 (33%) forced back/retreated
Match Report
Predictable result aside, an interesting match with Gerulaitis trying out some unusual things - ‘junking’ and drawing Borg to net. It disrupts Borg enough for him to drop a set, which would be a ‘win’ for his opponent
What makes winning a set even more of a ‘win’ is that Vitas doesn’t play well. He serve-volleys virtually always off first serves (stays back on 4, loses all of them). Serve isn’t very strong and wouldn’t be a surprise to see Borg strike return-pass winners regularly (which ends up not happening)
Vitas is a poor 15/33 rallying to net - and every reason for that to be, is. He comes in off some weak approach shots, he misses easy volleys (12 UEs in forecourt), he doesn’t place volleys well (good lot where Borg can reach them easily) - and Borg returns extremely well (with Vitas’ approaches and volleys and even serve giving him pretty good looks at the pass)
Not too bad from Vitas off the ground (again, relatively speaking, considering his opponent and the surface)
Ground UEs - Vitas 26, Borg 11 (excluding net shots and pass attempts)
Neutral UEs - Vitas 19, Borg 5
Why is that ‘not too bad’? Well, the rallies go on for awhile most of the time before Vitas blinks. He’s able to move Borg around some, or have him fall way behind the baseline with depth. Players like John Newcombe, Arthur Ashe and even Rod Laver have done worse - and in much shorter rallies than Vitas
(When the above constitutes ‘not too bad’, you know the guy is in serious trouble)
So from Vitas’ point of view -
- serve-volleying regularly behind not a strong serve (does well, winning 65%. Wouldn’t have been a surprise if it were 50% or under with the strenght of serve he shows)
- getting short end of stick rallying from the back (as expected, and it being mitigated by rallies not being short is un-essential)
- getting stiffed rallying to net
From Borg’s point of view
- outlasting Vitas from the back
- passing Vitas regularly
Sounds like a typical Borg clay showing, a 2 & 3 affair
Yet Vitas pinches a set. In first set, he flirts a bit with drawing Borg in with deliberate, short groundies. In second set, executes it more thoroughly
Its not out-and-out junking, a’le Orantes ‘75 US Open final. About 50% extra ‘junk’ added to Vitas regular baseline game (which isn’t junk free to begin with). No pace balls, softer shots, shorter balls with little pace tempting Borg in. He stays pretty consistent doing all this
And it works. Borg’s metronomic groundstroke rhythm is disrupted. He doesn’t like moving forward, and doesn’t deal too well with the pseudo-drop shots. Quick as he is, Borg reaches a little behind the service line in time that he can hit a top spin shot (as opposed to a delicate run-down-drop-shot shot)
Going for a winner from this position would be normal. He plays ‘approach shots’ (he’s all but at net already) instead. Or tries to, missing a small number. Or he retreats to baseline after hitting the balls. If he’s stuck at net, Vitas tries lobbing him
There’s not too much of that going on, but Borg isn’t convincing in putting those away either. And again, when having back-pedalled some to make the OHs, is is 2 minds to fall back or move in again
The whole dynamic is similar to what Vitas would do later in the year at the French Open final. Less systematic - its about 50% added to his usual game - than that
It seems to work beyond just action too, and reach into Borg’s head. He loses the set in, what for him, is a flurry of groundstroke aggression. Dropping the loopy shots, he goes for flatter, harder hit beat-down type hitting near end of set, while also seeking net. Misses a bunch of those to lose
Bloody good from Vitas. A lot better than getting passed every which way coming in and being bled out from the back against the sliding wall. Would not expect it to keep working for very long
As is, we don’t find out. For reasons best known to himself, Vitas drops all that and reverts to orthodox ground play in third set. And gets creamed - game, set, match, $150,000 Borg