Felix Mantilla beat Roger Federer 7-5, 6-2, 7-6(8) in the Rome final, 2003 on clay
It would turn out to be Mantilla's sole Masters title and the last title he'd ever win. Federer was playing his first final in Rome. To date, He's played 4 without winning the title
Mantilla won 125 points, Federer 118
Serve Stats
Mantilla...
- 1st serve percentage (109/139) 78%
- 1st serve points won (68/109) 62%
- 2nd serve points won (14/30) 47%
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (21/139) 15%
Federer...
- 1st serve percentage (51/104) 49%
- 1st serve points won (35/51) 69%
- 2nd serve points won (26/53) 49%
- Aces 8 (1 second serve)
- Double Faults 7
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (19/104) 18%
Serve Patterns
Mantilla served...
- to FH 13%
- to BH 85%
- to Body 2%
Federer served...
- to FH 24%
- to BH 72%
- to Body 4%
Return Stats
Mantilla made...
- 78 (19 FH, 59 BH), including 2 runaround FHs & 1 return-approach
- 2 Winners (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 11 Errors, comprising...
- 7 Unforced (7 BH)
- 4 Forced (4 BH)
- Return Rate (78/97) 80%
Federer made...
- 114 (23 FH, 91 BH), including 11 runaround FHs & 1 return-approach
- 2 Winners (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 21 Errors, comprising...
- 17 Unforced (4 FH, 13 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 4 Forced (3 FH, 1 BH)
- Return Rate (114/135) 84%
Break Points
Mantilla 6/11 (7 games)
Federer 3/17 (7 games)
Winners (excluding serves, including returns)
Mantilla 16 (6 FH, 4 BH, 2 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 OH)
Federer 46 (19 FH, 11 BH, 6 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 5 BHV, 4 OH)
Mantilla's FHs - 1 cc pass at net, 2 dtl (1 not clean & bad bounce related, 1 pass), 1 inside-out, 1 inside-in return and 1 lob
- BHs - 2 dtl (1 pass), 1 inside-in return pass and 1 drop shot
- 1 BHV was a swinging pass from near baseline
Federer's FHs - 7 cc (2 passes), 4 dtl (1 return), 5 inside-out, 2 inside-in and 1 running-down-drop-shot cc pass (not at net)
- BHs - 1 cc (effectively a drop shot), 6 dtl (1 return, 2 passes - 1 sliced), 3 drop shots and 1 running-down-drop-shot cc pass at net
- 7 from serve-volley points -
- 5 first volleys (1 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 OH)
- 2 second volleys (1 FHV, 1 OH)
- 1 other FHV was a swinging, non-net shot
- 1 other OH can reasonably be called a FHV
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Mantilla 49
- 28 Unforced (18 FH, 10 BH)
- 21 Forced (6 FH, 12 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 43.9
Federer 81
- 65 Unforced (33 FH, 27 BH, 1 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 OH)
- 16 Forced (6 FH, 4 BH, 2 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 BHOH)... with 1 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Mantilla was...
- 14/23 (61%) at net, with...
- 0/1 return-approaching
Federer was...
- 34/52 (65%) at net, including...
- 11/19 (58%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 8/15 (53%) off 1st serve and..
- 3/4 (75%) off 2nd serve
---
- 0/1 return-approaching
Match Report
Very close for a straight setter and extreme in terms of proactivity-passivity roles of the two players. Action is virtually all on Federer's racquet - he's the one hitting the winners, he's the one making the errors - while Mantilla puts the ball in play with the steadiness of a grandfather clock. Its not a good match, but a very interesting one. Statistically and otherwise
115 points are ended forcefully (winners or forced errors - including serves and returns). Federer wins 78 of them or 67.8%
128 points are ended unforcefully (unforced errors - including serve and returns). Federer loses 89 of them or 69.5%
Points won - Mantilla 125, Fed 118... very small given Mantilla wins a full 7 more games (including the tiebreak)
Points served - Mantilla 139, Fed 104... or Mantilla serving 57% of all points. Even sans a mammoth 26 point outlier game, his service games last 6.9 points per game, to Fed's 5.9. That's not as Fed-holding-easily & Mantilla-struggling-to-hold as it looks because there's a good lot of Fed being broken in short games too
Break points - Mantilla 6/11, Fed 3/17, with both having them in 7 games
Loser leading both 1st serve points (69% to 62%) and 2nd serve points (49% to 47%) is very rare. Compensated for by winner with much higher in-count (78% to 49%)
This is all in line with a 'who-plays-big-points-better' type match, and there are enough 'big points' that trends in how they go emerge. In other words, elements of 'choking' and 'clutching' can be seen (as opposed to random chance deciding how such points go).
Mantilla clutching is easier to see because his shot choices are so remarkably even keeled over course of match, so the more aggressive choices stand out. Fed's loose and error prone all match, including on the big points. He chokes particularly when in trouble on serve, while Mantilla clutches to hold in similar situations about as often as Fed blows it. Some combination of choking and clutching then - more Fed being at fault than Mantilla's credit
The match's ebbs and flows are a bit strange
Just 1 break in the first set and it ends the set. Prior to that game, Fed has break points in 4/6 return games and is 0/7 on them. Felix was 0/1
That counts for nothing though as Felix breaks to 15. Game starts with a bad bounce related Felix winner from what would otherwise have been a regulation neutral shot. Fed throws in his first double fault to bring up set point. He had 6 aces - including a 2nd serve and 1 in the game itself - prior to his first double. For rest of match, he has just 2 more aces and 6 doubles
On break point, Felix scuffles to net against a serve-volleying Federer and comes away with a FH net-to-net pass winner after a 2-3 shot exchange. In short, everything against run of play decides the set. With a bad bounce thrown in
Just like rest of match, action is on Fed's racquet in the opener. A bit different from rest of match is that his misses are particularly aggressive. He hits his winners and the errors he misses tend to be winner attempts. Fed has 19 winner attempt UEs in the match - and 8 of them are in first set. If whole match played out like this, it might qualify as a high quality encounter
Rest of the match doesn't quite play out like this. Match continues to be on Fed's racquet, but a significantly larger lot of his UEs become neutral shots. In other words, in first set, Fed hits winners and makes errors trying to hit winners. For rest of match, Fed continues making winners, but higher proportion of his errors are missing regulation, neutral balls
Fed breaks to open the second set. Coming after floundering on break points in the first, its ironic. Then holds to love to consolidate. His first hold to love
Then loses the next 8 games to trail 2 sets and a break
Losing 8 games on the trot is unusual, but it happens on clay. What's particularly strange is how often he's leading in those games before things turn. Both serve and return games
Service games Fed loses include scores of 30-0 and 30-0
Return games Fed loses include scores of 0-15 and 0-30
Lot of neutral UEs from Fed in this part of the match. More than loose play, he just doesn't seem to be in Felix's league for basic consistency of shot. Rallies aren't long before the errors come
Neutral UEs for the match read Felix 21, Federer 36
Down 2 sets and 0-2, Fed hits back in an aggressive game to break back and wins 4 games in a row to take 4-2 lead. 2 shots worth mentioning among in this period is Fed running full speed from out of court to just about reach a short volley and flick it for a winner. And Fed coping with a thundering return to the baseline with a fended flick half-volley BH that's effectively a drop shot winner. The shot is deliberate
Serving for the set, Fed is broken from 40-15 up in a game beginning and ending with double faults. Felix throws in a precise return-pass winner and holds steady at net against power passes to force a running-down-drop-volley at net error
Next game lasts 26 points and Felix saves 7 break points. 5 of them aggressively. He barely hits an attacking shot all match, but when he needs to, ups it just so
Serving to send set into tiebreak, Fed double faults twice in a row to make it deuce, but takes the next 2 points
Tiebreak is well played and tense enough. Fed opens with a mini-break by coming to net and dispatching BHV winner. Felix responds with a BH cc winning shot - again showing this ability to hit a shot just strong enough to end point when he needs it. Superb running-down-drop-shot pass winner from Fed at net gets him late mini-break and puts him up 5-3. Excellent coping with drop shot situation a couple points later by Felix forces Fed into a BHOH error. Felix blows his first match point with a rare BH miss and Fed erases the second with whipped FH cc winner. Fed misses his only set point with another BH error
The crucial point is at 8-8, when Fed misses a routine putaway OH, and match is done the point after with Fed's 34th FH UE
Quite the rollercoaster for straight set encounter
It would turn out to be Mantilla's sole Masters title and the last title he'd ever win. Federer was playing his first final in Rome. To date, He's played 4 without winning the title
Mantilla won 125 points, Federer 118
Serve Stats
Mantilla...
- 1st serve percentage (109/139) 78%
- 1st serve points won (68/109) 62%
- 2nd serve points won (14/30) 47%
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (21/139) 15%
Federer...
- 1st serve percentage (51/104) 49%
- 1st serve points won (35/51) 69%
- 2nd serve points won (26/53) 49%
- Aces 8 (1 second serve)
- Double Faults 7
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (19/104) 18%
Serve Patterns
Mantilla served...
- to FH 13%
- to BH 85%
- to Body 2%
Federer served...
- to FH 24%
- to BH 72%
- to Body 4%
Return Stats
Mantilla made...
- 78 (19 FH, 59 BH), including 2 runaround FHs & 1 return-approach
- 2 Winners (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 11 Errors, comprising...
- 7 Unforced (7 BH)
- 4 Forced (4 BH)
- Return Rate (78/97) 80%
Federer made...
- 114 (23 FH, 91 BH), including 11 runaround FHs & 1 return-approach
- 2 Winners (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 21 Errors, comprising...
- 17 Unforced (4 FH, 13 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 4 Forced (3 FH, 1 BH)
- Return Rate (114/135) 84%
Break Points
Mantilla 6/11 (7 games)
Federer 3/17 (7 games)
Winners (excluding serves, including returns)
Mantilla 16 (6 FH, 4 BH, 2 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 OH)
Federer 46 (19 FH, 11 BH, 6 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 5 BHV, 4 OH)
Mantilla's FHs - 1 cc pass at net, 2 dtl (1 not clean & bad bounce related, 1 pass), 1 inside-out, 1 inside-in return and 1 lob
- BHs - 2 dtl (1 pass), 1 inside-in return pass and 1 drop shot
- 1 BHV was a swinging pass from near baseline
Federer's FHs - 7 cc (2 passes), 4 dtl (1 return), 5 inside-out, 2 inside-in and 1 running-down-drop-shot cc pass (not at net)
- BHs - 1 cc (effectively a drop shot), 6 dtl (1 return, 2 passes - 1 sliced), 3 drop shots and 1 running-down-drop-shot cc pass at net
- 7 from serve-volley points -
- 5 first volleys (1 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 OH)
- 2 second volleys (1 FHV, 1 OH)
- 1 other FHV was a swinging, non-net shot
- 1 other OH can reasonably be called a FHV
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Mantilla 49
- 28 Unforced (18 FH, 10 BH)
- 21 Forced (6 FH, 12 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 43.9
Federer 81
- 65 Unforced (33 FH, 27 BH, 1 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 OH)
- 16 Forced (6 FH, 4 BH, 2 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 BHOH)... with 1 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Mantilla was...
- 14/23 (61%) at net, with...
- 0/1 return-approaching
Federer was...
- 34/52 (65%) at net, including...
- 11/19 (58%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 8/15 (53%) off 1st serve and..
- 3/4 (75%) off 2nd serve
---
- 0/1 return-approaching
Match Report
Very close for a straight setter and extreme in terms of proactivity-passivity roles of the two players. Action is virtually all on Federer's racquet - he's the one hitting the winners, he's the one making the errors - while Mantilla puts the ball in play with the steadiness of a grandfather clock. Its not a good match, but a very interesting one. Statistically and otherwise
115 points are ended forcefully (winners or forced errors - including serves and returns). Federer wins 78 of them or 67.8%
128 points are ended unforcefully (unforced errors - including serve and returns). Federer loses 89 of them or 69.5%
Points won - Mantilla 125, Fed 118... very small given Mantilla wins a full 7 more games (including the tiebreak)
Points served - Mantilla 139, Fed 104... or Mantilla serving 57% of all points. Even sans a mammoth 26 point outlier game, his service games last 6.9 points per game, to Fed's 5.9. That's not as Fed-holding-easily & Mantilla-struggling-to-hold as it looks because there's a good lot of Fed being broken in short games too
Break points - Mantilla 6/11, Fed 3/17, with both having them in 7 games
Loser leading both 1st serve points (69% to 62%) and 2nd serve points (49% to 47%) is very rare. Compensated for by winner with much higher in-count (78% to 49%)
This is all in line with a 'who-plays-big-points-better' type match, and there are enough 'big points' that trends in how they go emerge. In other words, elements of 'choking' and 'clutching' can be seen (as opposed to random chance deciding how such points go).
Mantilla clutching is easier to see because his shot choices are so remarkably even keeled over course of match, so the more aggressive choices stand out. Fed's loose and error prone all match, including on the big points. He chokes particularly when in trouble on serve, while Mantilla clutches to hold in similar situations about as often as Fed blows it. Some combination of choking and clutching then - more Fed being at fault than Mantilla's credit
The match's ebbs and flows are a bit strange
Just 1 break in the first set and it ends the set. Prior to that game, Fed has break points in 4/6 return games and is 0/7 on them. Felix was 0/1
That counts for nothing though as Felix breaks to 15. Game starts with a bad bounce related Felix winner from what would otherwise have been a regulation neutral shot. Fed throws in his first double fault to bring up set point. He had 6 aces - including a 2nd serve and 1 in the game itself - prior to his first double. For rest of match, he has just 2 more aces and 6 doubles
On break point, Felix scuffles to net against a serve-volleying Federer and comes away with a FH net-to-net pass winner after a 2-3 shot exchange. In short, everything against run of play decides the set. With a bad bounce thrown in
Just like rest of match, action is on Fed's racquet in the opener. A bit different from rest of match is that his misses are particularly aggressive. He hits his winners and the errors he misses tend to be winner attempts. Fed has 19 winner attempt UEs in the match - and 8 of them are in first set. If whole match played out like this, it might qualify as a high quality encounter
Rest of the match doesn't quite play out like this. Match continues to be on Fed's racquet, but a significantly larger lot of his UEs become neutral shots. In other words, in first set, Fed hits winners and makes errors trying to hit winners. For rest of match, Fed continues making winners, but higher proportion of his errors are missing regulation, neutral balls
Fed breaks to open the second set. Coming after floundering on break points in the first, its ironic. Then holds to love to consolidate. His first hold to love
Then loses the next 8 games to trail 2 sets and a break
Losing 8 games on the trot is unusual, but it happens on clay. What's particularly strange is how often he's leading in those games before things turn. Both serve and return games
Service games Fed loses include scores of 30-0 and 30-0
Return games Fed loses include scores of 0-15 and 0-30
Lot of neutral UEs from Fed in this part of the match. More than loose play, he just doesn't seem to be in Felix's league for basic consistency of shot. Rallies aren't long before the errors come
Neutral UEs for the match read Felix 21, Federer 36
Down 2 sets and 0-2, Fed hits back in an aggressive game to break back and wins 4 games in a row to take 4-2 lead. 2 shots worth mentioning among in this period is Fed running full speed from out of court to just about reach a short volley and flick it for a winner. And Fed coping with a thundering return to the baseline with a fended flick half-volley BH that's effectively a drop shot winner. The shot is deliberate
Serving for the set, Fed is broken from 40-15 up in a game beginning and ending with double faults. Felix throws in a precise return-pass winner and holds steady at net against power passes to force a running-down-drop-volley at net error
Next game lasts 26 points and Felix saves 7 break points. 5 of them aggressively. He barely hits an attacking shot all match, but when he needs to, ups it just so
Serving to send set into tiebreak, Fed double faults twice in a row to make it deuce, but takes the next 2 points
Tiebreak is well played and tense enough. Fed opens with a mini-break by coming to net and dispatching BHV winner. Felix responds with a BH cc winning shot - again showing this ability to hit a shot just strong enough to end point when he needs it. Superb running-down-drop-shot pass winner from Fed at net gets him late mini-break and puts him up 5-3. Excellent coping with drop shot situation a couple points later by Felix forces Fed into a BHOH error. Felix blows his first match point with a rare BH miss and Fed erases the second with whipped FH cc winner. Fed misses his only set point with another BH error
The crucial point is at 8-8, when Fed misses a routine putaway OH, and match is done the point after with Fed's 34th FH UE
Quite the rollercoaster for straight set encounter
Last edited: