Stefanos Tsitsipas beat Dominic Thiem 6-7(6), 6-2, 7-6(4) in the Year End Championship final, 2019 on indoor hard court in London, England
To date, this is Tsitsipas’ only title at the event. He finished top of his group with a 2-1 record and was seeded 6th. Thiem also topped his group with 2-1 record and was seeded 5th. He would finish runner-up the following year also
Tsitsipas won 110 points, Thiem 93
Serve Stats
Tsitsipas...
- 1st serve percentage (60/97) 62%
- 1st serve points won (50/60) 83%
- 2nd serve points won (23/37) 62%
- Aces 9, Service Winners 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (36/97) 37%
Thiem...
- 1st serve percentage (73/106) 69%
- 1st serve points won (52/73) 71%
- 2nd serve points won (17/33) 52%
- Aces 9, Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (32/106) 30%
Serve Patterns
Tsitsipas served...
- to FH 45%
- to BH 47%
- to Body 7%
Thiem served...
- to FH 37%
- to BH 59%
- to Body 4%
Return Stats
Tsitsipas made...
- 71 (23 FH, 48 BH)
- 2 Winners (2 FH)
- 21 Errors, comprising...
- 9 Unforced (4 FH, 5 BH)
- 12 Forced (6 FH, 6 BH)
- Return Rate (71/103) 69%
Thiem made...
- 61 (35 FH, 26 BH), including 12 runaround FHs
- 26 Errors, comprising...
- 17 Unforced (12 FH, 5 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 9 Forced (6 FH, 3 BH)
- Return Rate (61/97) 63%
Break Points
Tsitsipas 3/10 (6 games)
Thiem 1/4 (2 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Tsitsipas 24 (13 FH, 2 BH, 2 FHV, 3 BHV, 4 OH)
Thiem 23 (8 FH, 3 BH, 5 FHV, 3 BHV, 4 OH)
Tsitsipas' FHs - 4 cc, 2 dtl (1 return), 3 inside-out, 1 inside-out/dtl, 2 inside-in (1 return), 1 longline
- BHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl
- 2 from serve-volley points, both first volley BHVs
- 1 other FHV was a swinging, non-net longline
Thiem's FHs - 3 cc, 1 dtl pass, 2 inside-out, 1 inside-in, 1 longline
- BHs - 1 dtl, 2 longline
- 2 FHVs were swinging inside-outs (1 at net, 1 not)
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Tsitsipas 38
- 20 Unforced (12 FH, 7 BH, 1 FHV)... the FHV was a swinging, non-net shot
- 18 Forced (8 FH, 8 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46.5
Thiem 47
- 34 Unforced (18 FH, 14 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)... with 1 FH at net & 1 swining, non-net BHV
- 13 Forced (2 FH, 11 BH)... with 1 BH running-down-drop-shot (not at net)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 49.1
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Tsitsipas was...
- 18/21 (86%) at net, including...
- 2/2 serve-volleying, both 2nd serves
Thiem was...
- 17/20 (85%) at net, including...
- 0/1 serve-volleying, a 2nd serve
---
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
Excellent match of hard hitting, attacking baseline play and a great performance by Tsitsipas, who does everything better than a well-playing Thiem. Court is quickish
Despite that, Thiem plays well enough to stay close enough that result remains up in the air. Tsis has ghost of an edge in first set, which goes to Thiem in tiebreak. Tsis dominates second set and carries on in same vein for half the third set, where he’s up a break and holding with considerably more ease. Thiem breaks back and equalizes share of play - which reflects a step up for him, a step down for the recently dominant Tsis - but he does not have better of it as match heads to cauldron of tiebreak. Which Tsis takes, fittingly
With 2 tiebreaks and split, and Tsis delivering a convincing brace, its natural match long stats favour him. But even sans the 6-2 set, he has better of things
Match long -
- first serve in - Tsis 62%, Thiem 69%
- first serve won - Tsis 83%, Thiem 71%
- second serve won - Tsis 62%, Thiem 52%
Sans the 6-2 set -
- first serve in - Tsis 62%, Thiem 67%
- first serve won - Tsis 82%, Thiem 72%
- second serve won - Tsis 57%, Thiem 59%
Thiem going up on second serve points won is deceptive since he serves a large 15/19 or 79% in the second set (he loses all 4 second serve points). In quick conditions, with 2 good servers and good in counts, the first serve points is more important - and Tsis handily has better of that - both match long and excluding the one sided set
Tsis finishes with 24 winners, 20 UEs, while forcing 13 errors. Outstanding
Thiem has 23 winners, 34 UEs while forcing 18. Good
Throw in leading unreturneds 37% to 30% and not double faulting while Thiem does so 3 times - and picture of Tsis having substantially better of things comes through.
Serve & Return
Tsis serves better and Tsis returns better. Thiem’s serve is also strong, his returning a little off at times
Aces/Service Winners are virtually same (Thiem has an extra service winner), but Tsis gaining his 10 from 60 first serves, to Thiem’s 11 from 73
Not much in that. But Tsis also has slightly more powerful serve and gets them out wider, and more damagingly. In due time, he’s able to serve aces and hard forced errors with slower, well placed sliced serves that curl away. Thiem sticks to brute force power, usually not too far out of reach
Tsis leads unreturends 37% to 30%
Off return errors, Tsis has 9 UEs, Thiem 17. These are tough for UEs, hefty serves that don’t require much movement to reach. Thiem dishes out just as many, and probably more such serves, and Tsis’ done well to keep his count so low. His returning consistency is better
And the quality of his returns are better. He gets a few deep down the middle troublingly, and whacks a couple winners against good serves. Thiem’s returning is orthodox and untroubling, as suggested by Tsis’ high second serve points won. He has a go with brute force runaround FHs without much success
Double faults - Tsis 0, Thiem 3
Gist, in just about every way, Tsis doing better. But 30% freebies and drawing good lot of soft returns by Thiem is good enough to be holding behind regularly too
To date, this is Tsitsipas’ only title at the event. He finished top of his group with a 2-1 record and was seeded 6th. Thiem also topped his group with 2-1 record and was seeded 5th. He would finish runner-up the following year also
Tsitsipas won 110 points, Thiem 93
Serve Stats
Tsitsipas...
- 1st serve percentage (60/97) 62%
- 1st serve points won (50/60) 83%
- 2nd serve points won (23/37) 62%
- Aces 9, Service Winners 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (36/97) 37%
Thiem...
- 1st serve percentage (73/106) 69%
- 1st serve points won (52/73) 71%
- 2nd serve points won (17/33) 52%
- Aces 9, Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (32/106) 30%
Serve Patterns
Tsitsipas served...
- to FH 45%
- to BH 47%
- to Body 7%
Thiem served...
- to FH 37%
- to BH 59%
- to Body 4%
Return Stats
Tsitsipas made...
- 71 (23 FH, 48 BH)
- 2 Winners (2 FH)
- 21 Errors, comprising...
- 9 Unforced (4 FH, 5 BH)
- 12 Forced (6 FH, 6 BH)
- Return Rate (71/103) 69%
Thiem made...
- 61 (35 FH, 26 BH), including 12 runaround FHs
- 26 Errors, comprising...
- 17 Unforced (12 FH, 5 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 9 Forced (6 FH, 3 BH)
- Return Rate (61/97) 63%
Break Points
Tsitsipas 3/10 (6 games)
Thiem 1/4 (2 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Tsitsipas 24 (13 FH, 2 BH, 2 FHV, 3 BHV, 4 OH)
Thiem 23 (8 FH, 3 BH, 5 FHV, 3 BHV, 4 OH)
Tsitsipas' FHs - 4 cc, 2 dtl (1 return), 3 inside-out, 1 inside-out/dtl, 2 inside-in (1 return), 1 longline
- BHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl
- 2 from serve-volley points, both first volley BHVs
- 1 other FHV was a swinging, non-net longline
Thiem's FHs - 3 cc, 1 dtl pass, 2 inside-out, 1 inside-in, 1 longline
- BHs - 1 dtl, 2 longline
- 2 FHVs were swinging inside-outs (1 at net, 1 not)
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Tsitsipas 38
- 20 Unforced (12 FH, 7 BH, 1 FHV)... the FHV was a swinging, non-net shot
- 18 Forced (8 FH, 8 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46.5
Thiem 47
- 34 Unforced (18 FH, 14 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)... with 1 FH at net & 1 swining, non-net BHV
- 13 Forced (2 FH, 11 BH)... with 1 BH running-down-drop-shot (not at net)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 49.1
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Tsitsipas was...
- 18/21 (86%) at net, including...
- 2/2 serve-volleying, both 2nd serves
Thiem was...
- 17/20 (85%) at net, including...
- 0/1 serve-volleying, a 2nd serve
---
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
Excellent match of hard hitting, attacking baseline play and a great performance by Tsitsipas, who does everything better than a well-playing Thiem. Court is quickish
Despite that, Thiem plays well enough to stay close enough that result remains up in the air. Tsis has ghost of an edge in first set, which goes to Thiem in tiebreak. Tsis dominates second set and carries on in same vein for half the third set, where he’s up a break and holding with considerably more ease. Thiem breaks back and equalizes share of play - which reflects a step up for him, a step down for the recently dominant Tsis - but he does not have better of it as match heads to cauldron of tiebreak. Which Tsis takes, fittingly
With 2 tiebreaks and split, and Tsis delivering a convincing brace, its natural match long stats favour him. But even sans the 6-2 set, he has better of things
Match long -
- first serve in - Tsis 62%, Thiem 69%
- first serve won - Tsis 83%, Thiem 71%
- second serve won - Tsis 62%, Thiem 52%
Sans the 6-2 set -
- first serve in - Tsis 62%, Thiem 67%
- first serve won - Tsis 82%, Thiem 72%
- second serve won - Tsis 57%, Thiem 59%
Thiem going up on second serve points won is deceptive since he serves a large 15/19 or 79% in the second set (he loses all 4 second serve points). In quick conditions, with 2 good servers and good in counts, the first serve points is more important - and Tsis handily has better of that - both match long and excluding the one sided set
Tsis finishes with 24 winners, 20 UEs, while forcing 13 errors. Outstanding
Thiem has 23 winners, 34 UEs while forcing 18. Good
Throw in leading unreturneds 37% to 30% and not double faulting while Thiem does so 3 times - and picture of Tsis having substantially better of things comes through.
Serve & Return
Tsis serves better and Tsis returns better. Thiem’s serve is also strong, his returning a little off at times
Aces/Service Winners are virtually same (Thiem has an extra service winner), but Tsis gaining his 10 from 60 first serves, to Thiem’s 11 from 73
Not much in that. But Tsis also has slightly more powerful serve and gets them out wider, and more damagingly. In due time, he’s able to serve aces and hard forced errors with slower, well placed sliced serves that curl away. Thiem sticks to brute force power, usually not too far out of reach
Tsis leads unreturends 37% to 30%
Off return errors, Tsis has 9 UEs, Thiem 17. These are tough for UEs, hefty serves that don’t require much movement to reach. Thiem dishes out just as many, and probably more such serves, and Tsis’ done well to keep his count so low. His returning consistency is better
And the quality of his returns are better. He gets a few deep down the middle troublingly, and whacks a couple winners against good serves. Thiem’s returning is orthodox and untroubling, as suggested by Tsis’ high second serve points won. He has a go with brute force runaround FHs without much success
Double faults - Tsis 0, Thiem 3
Gist, in just about every way, Tsis doing better. But 30% freebies and drawing good lot of soft returns by Thiem is good enough to be holding behind regularly too