TheSneakerologist
Rookie
No I'm bored and stuck at home doing nothing.
Monfils... just a bit arrogant?
- Thread starter Alexandros
- Start date
MEAC_ALLAMERICAN
Legend
Ohhhh,
Okay now that we have cleared that up, Happy Posting :grin:
Okay now that we have cleared that up, Happy Posting :grin:
TheSneakerologist
Rookie
haha fa sho.
Right on brother
Black people aren't arrogant. It ain't bragging if it's true.
We allamericans, so we knows how to call a spade a spade.
The truth hurts but at least we don't lie.
Right on.
Again, what is wrong with telling the truth?
Black people aren't arrogant. It ain't bragging if it's true.
We allamericans, so we knows how to call a spade a spade.
The truth hurts but at least we don't lie.
Right on.
anointedone
Banned
Sounds like he will be another Gael Monfils according to that evaluation. So Monfils was dissing one of his soon-to-be peers then.
Scientologie could help you out you know ?
quit with teh scientologie business
my_forehand
Professional
2 MEAC_AMERICAN's?
Scientologie could help you out you know ?
And Spelling could help you out, you know?
Sorry I couldnt resist.
Basically Monfils is a better player IMO. On the day? No, Isner was, hence he got through to the finals and Monfils didnt.
Sounds like he will be another Gael Monfils according to that evaluation. So Monfils was dissing one of his soon-to-be peers then.
You really have no use for Monfils do you?
MEAC_ALLAMERICAN
Legend
Who and what are you?
And this "we" thing, speak for yourself because "we" don't know each other.
Please get your act together.
Last edited:
rosenstar
Professional
I was at that match and watched it in person. Monfils is definitely a better all around player. He can do everything; grind, serve, volley, hit winners, work the point. All Isner did was serve, volley, and smash the forehand. Unfortunately for Monfils, this was all Isner needed to do to win. Monfils woulda had him easy on a slower surface.
Yes, and if the dog hadn't stopped to pee, he would have caught the rabbit.. If's don't mean anything. Yes, Monfils would probably beat him on clay. But all that matters today is that Isner beat him on Hardcourts. It is no longer boring slow clay season, it is exciting fast court season.
rosenstar
Professional
is this a racial slur? the hell is that supposed to mean? And it definitely is bragging if it's true... man you gotta get your **** together
Lleytian3
Semi-Pro
Yes, and if the dog hadn't stopped to pee, he would have caught the rabbit.. If's don't mean anything. Yes, Monfils would probably beat him on clay. But all that matters today is that Isner beat him on Hardcourts. It is no longer boring slow clay season, it is exciting fast court season.
shows how much you know about tennis, the boring slow clay season is where players get most of their points. clay season is not boring in the least, cause the clay is where it really test your ability to grind on long matches to really work out the points and to put that mental feature in your game. heck anyone can smash winners and hit big serves, in clay its all about construction of the point.
but the us open series is the new in thing new, is it really going to be that exciting. what is federer and nadal going to decide who wins which masters and then have another federer- nadal final. yep that is really intersting all right.
IAMLegend
Rookie
Monfils was serving for the match. He would have had him if here were a bit less fragile mentally. Monfils is a bottler.
rosenstar
Professional
I have to agree with you there. he choked and it cost him the match.
