NBMJ - Wilson Sting SC, please ...

anirut

Legend
I remember reading sometimes ago about NBMJ using the Wilson Sting. I'd say that I LOVE reading your posts, NBMJ! And I appreciate your comments and insights.

OK, I have the Sting SC -- the bronze color one with an inverted stabilzer bar at the throat.

A little story: I have been using the Dunlop Revelation Pro (18x20) and the ROK 93 for sometime. I have also used the Volkl C9 (16x20 or 19?) and the Head Ti Radical MP (sold off). I should say that after playing with those 'modern' rackets for some years, I was playing "what-the-heck's-wrong-with-me tennis". Tennis had since become something like "just-to-get-some-sweat" exercise. I used to play competitive when in college (I'm 39 now).

Then last week I dug out my 1995-bought and twice-used Sting SC Mid (16x18) and strung it with the low-cost Gamma Syn at 57 and I was playing tennis like I used to in my college years. My tennis pal (we've been playing together since primary school) was kind of stunned that my shots have gotten back to what they used to be -- precise and controlled. I have no problem hitting hard and swinging out.

So, to sum up, I'm looking for a new racket that will match the Sting SC's playability (and specs). I have no information whatsoever with regard to the racket I own. I bought it in 1995. I asked Wilson but so far they've only asked me back if I own the Midplus or Oversize (inspite of my telling them that I have the Mid size).

I'm actually quite interested in the Fischer Pro Extreme FT (95 sq.in.) and the Wilson PS 90 (now on sale here). I'm in Thailand (yes, where the Tsunami swept the west coasts last year) and it's IMPOSSIBLE to demo a racket here.

A little about my game. Started off with wooden days. I now play rough, hard-hitting recreational tennis. I don't compete. I hit hard, mostly from the base line. Don't usually go up front but can do just to survive. I usually serve kicks -- not tall enough for hammers. Mostly hit flat groundies with at little top-spin (just to keep the ball in). One handed backhand, either flat or tops. Don't usually slice except when pushed to do like in approaches and usually slice with backhands only.

Thanks and please advice. Sorry for the long post.
 
I also have a Sting Mid size that is black with blue stripe. Can someone tell me a little bit more about the Wilson Sting story? Thanks.
 

NoBadMojo

G.O.A.T.
Anirut thanks, but I dont recall hitting the Wilson Sting so can be of no help to you...sounds like that bat has some magical properties....i'd get a bunch of those if i were you because there is good Mojo in this racquet for you ;O You might wish to check on ****
 

anirut

Legend
Thanks, NBMJ for your reply. I can't get the racket anymore, not even on ****. Have tried searching the net for Sting SC.

Anyway, anyone around here know the properties of Silicon Carbide? How stiff/flex is the material in comparison with graphite?
 

tedmeister

Rookie
anirut said:
Anyway, anyone around here know the properties of Silicon Carbide? How stiff/flex is the material in comparison with graphite?
Hard as in industrial strength abrasives, think sandpaper and grinding stones. The blue sting, high beam series has a bar on the throat like the one on the Prince graphites. 16mains, great spin.
 
tedmeister said:
Hard as in industrial strength abrasives, think sandpaper and grinding stones. The blue sting, high beam series has a bar on the throat like the one on the Prince graphites. 16mains, great spin.

Not that high beam/ thick profile thing. It is a very slim profile thing. Like prostaff 85. Also it is definitely a mid-size. Personally I don't like it much.
 
anirut said:
Thanks, NBMJ for your reply. I can't get the racket anymore, not even on ****. Have tried searching the net for Sting SC.

Anyway, anyone around here know the properties of Silicon Carbide? How stiff/flex is the material in comparison with graphite?

Saw one on sale. Will cost you $30 plust $25 shipping. Cosmetic average but old style racket last a lifetime usually.
 
Anirut, funny you mention the sting mid, I have a stick IMO better than the sting mid 85 which is identical in mold only it has more fiberglass making it more flexible, similar to dunlop rev pro and ROK( I have both also on **** for cheap) it is Brand new and in size 3/8

http://cgi.****.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7148290159&rd=1&sspagename=STRK:MESE:IT&rd=1

For Pro Staff 6.0 85 users this is an opportunity to try a very flexible 85 I would also recommend this

http://cgi.****.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7148293422&rd=1&sspagename=STRK:MESE:IT&rd=1
 
loubapache said:
I have seen some Sting in Midsize but with 95 SI head. yip kok kuin, is that the one you have? High Beam series?

My blue sting looks exactly like that splading stick above. One must be a copy of the other or they are basically the same stick but different 'branding'. The only problem with the blue sting is that it does not have a PWS so it is kind of whobby. The brown sting has PWS but I have not played with it before so not sure how it will play.
Just out of curosity, which Sting is older. And which one is made in St Vincent? I checked my blue sting and checked that brown sting before, none of them have the 'red dye'.
 

anirut

Legend
tedmeister said:
Hard as in industrial strength abrasives, think sandpaper and grinding stones. The blue sting, high beam series has a bar on the throat like the one on the Prince graphites. 16mains, great spin.

So, inasmuch as my Sting says "Silicon Carbide - Graphite", would that mean the racket should be pretty much stiffer than 100% graphite. I understand that Silicon Carbide is more on the hard and brittle side.

What about Kevlar? It is not a 'hard' material but more of 'tough'. Why would they use Kevlar in rackets? Would Kelvar-enhanced rackets be more flexible than Silicon Carbide-enhanced, if the percentages of the mixtures were equal?

I brought up the material discussion just to see if I can find a racket that can be a close match to the Sting SC.

And my Sting SC is thin beam 17mm, metallic brownish (more like bronze), with PWS and about 4 pts head-light. I can't attach a picture but it looks like the one **** with the stablizer bar, EXCEPT for the color, the PWS and, of course, the SC.

Oh, yes, what's the head size of the Sting on ****? I think the Sting models (the graphite and the SC+graphite) should have the same head size. This is looking from the investment side. I may be wrong, of course.
 
It comes without a bumper, so it is more maneuverable and more Head light something like 12 points, the Head size is 85 it is also 17mm, but flex’s at 54, stick is super nice with tons of feel, it is a classic, it is like the maroon JACK Kramer PS 6.0 85 which had more glass in it.
 
I went out and buy the Sting SC just for fun. I compare the two racket side by side and they are identical in size and shape except the PWS. I have yet to play with them but just by tapping them with a tennis ball. SC is definitely more stable and more flexible and that to me is the trademark of a better racket. Does anyone know the history of the Sting?
 
People who are into oldies and flexies should try out any one of these:

MOST FLEXIBLE PLAYERS RACQUETS: all flex below 50 and should be strung below 50lbs

Head XRC 3/8 8/10 $39
Head XRC ¼ 7/10 $29
Head Director 3/8 7/10 $19

Puma PCS ¼ 9/10 $59
-Super with %80 fiberglass !!!!

Mizuno ProMS21 5/2 9.9/10 $79
Mizuno ProMS21 1/2 9/10 $69
-Rim Injection Made in Japan

Spalding Ultimate Graphite 3/8 9/9/10 $39
-more flexible Wilson Sting Mid 90

ProKennex Graphit LTD OS 3/8 8/10 $29
-more flexible Head prestige 660

ProKennex Graphit LTD 90 3/8 9/10 $49
-more flexible ProStaff 85

Dunlop Power Play 90 ½ 7/10 $19
-similar to Prince Magnesium 90
the ultimate in noodle stick
 

anirut

Legend
Hi Yip:

Let us know how you like the racket. Don't sting it too tight, though. I will be too boardy to play with.

As for the history of the Sting, I really don't know. I bought mine for a heavy discount. Probably because the racket was already an outdated model then in 1995. I asked Wilson for info on the racket and they don't even have it. They've even asked me to contact Wilson Malaysia (well, I'm in Thailand).

As for oldies, I have two more:

1). The Pro Kennex Graphite 90 -- it says on the beam " ... It features the power of graphite with the touch of fiberglass." This ones' a 17 mm. Very flexy. I have yet to really play with this one. I got this one for only $10 (USD equivalent).

2). The Head Graphite Edge TXE -- all graphite, same head size as the Sting SC I have. The grommets are all worn out and broken. I can't find any replacement. This one's pretty user-power hungry 19mm. A very nice control racket. This one I got with the original cover for peanuts -- just $2.50 (USD equivalent).

Of course, I'm keeping all of 'em.

Only wish I can attach picures for you to see ...
 
I played with the Sting SC today. Great racket. Quite Stiff. Don't think it is a fiberglass based like the blue Sting. But with PWS and what a diff it makes. Not selling.
 

anirut

Legend
So, Yip, to which currently available rackets would you compare the Sting SC to? Stiffness-wise and swingweight-wise.

I can't demo rackets where I live (Thailand) so I need to find a racket with similar playing characteristics to the Sting SC.

And, Yip, did you get your SC new? And how much did you pay for?
 
$20. Not new. Used but playable condition. I am never picky about condition. Similar feel ..... old wilson stick with pws comes to mind. Wilson advantage I think. If you can get yours so cheap, you can just go out and buy a dozen of old stick to try.
 

anirut

Legend
Yip, to what racket "currently in production" (or readily available in the market) would you compare the SC to?

Please let me know.
 
I dont have a 'current production' racket. My last 'latest' racket is the rok 93 which is to me a cheap repro of the good old days.
 

anirut

Legend
Aha... so you also have the ROK93. I have it too. As of now, I prefer the SC over the ROK. What's your preference between the ROK and the SC?

I'm thinking about "leading-up" my other rackets (ROK, Revelation Tour) to match the SC's weight and balance point and will have them all strung with the same type of string at the same or at playable tension (esp. the ROK) and see how they play.

Will let you know the result next Thursday or Friday. (I play only once a week on Wenesday).
 

jlui21

Rookie
What not to know abou the Wilson Sting 2?

michael chaho said:
Spalding Ultimate Graphite 3/8 9/9/10 $39
-more flexible Wilson Sting Mid 90

This is a rather old post, but I wanted to know if anyone knew much about the Wilson Sting 2 racquet including the specs. And how does it compare to the other Wilson PWS racquets?

Hopefully, someone will know something about it. Thanks ~ jlui
 
Top