Never understood the complaining. Djokovic should have never been in Rome final this year. (he wouldn't be there if Del Potro wasn't such a pathetic choker)
Because you believe every close match Nadal ever won was a choke from his opponent. Doesn't mean it's actually true.What is this logic lol. Nadal would be sitting on one non-clay slam if nobody choked or played subpar against him
Well, it's your fault that you support a guy that free market doesn't favour, nobody is forcing you to not back the winner. Tennis is still a business first and sport second. Plus, if you really cared why don't you boycott it, so they will be forced to give equality.They have a day-off between each RR match, and then no break when it matters most.....gifting Group B a massive advantage.
So whoever plays on Day One is exactly who the organizers want to win the tournament.
The fix was in from the very beginning
All players choke, champions just choke less, so it's kind of true. It's semantics really, they choked more or he choked less, person who makes less mistakes wins.
It's weird, people who have all the luck complain the most. Your guy won 19 majors and you complain it's not fair? I don't see Delpo fans complain how unfair things are for him cuz of injuries and scheduling and fan bias. It's real life too, usually middle class is complaining the most, the poorest are quiet all the time.It would have been more fair if Group A had played its 2nd and 3rd matches on back-to-back days, then both sides get a day-off before the SF
It didn't impact Rafa, since he's not in the SF
I was never convinced that Djokovic would win the SF and Final, so I never viewed the Federer-Djokovic RR match as a big deal
Just one more silly thing about the WTFExo...They have a day-off between each RR match, and then no break when it matters most.....gifting Group B a massive advantage.
So whoever plays on Day One is exactly who the organizers want to win the tournament.
The fix was in from the very beginning
But what about being fair for Thiem?It didn't impact Rafa, since he's not in the SF
I'm complaining for Tsitsipas (whom I don't like, by the way)....
The format is bad, regardless of who the players are.
If anything my idea would hurt Rafa, because he'd have had to play Medvedev and Tsitsipas on back-to-back days.
See, you don't know that.I was never convinced that Djokovic would win the SF and Final, so I never viewed the Federer-Djokovic RR match as a big deal
It is good that you know. But everyone should know.
What would be unfair for Thiem?
Djokovic cries in defeat at the Olympics, so its quite the opposite of ATP Finals
He gets to play at night which gives him less time to recover for the final.
I don't compare an evening match to a completely different day
The Olympics is a joke, and one of the reasons is that some players would give their left arm to win it, while others gladly skip it.Djokovic cries in defeat at the Olympics, so its quite the opposite of ATP Finals
But it is equally unfair.I don't compare an evening match to a completely different day
Playing in the evening compared to playing a day session is not something I've ever complained about....
We'll I've never complained when Rafa's played night matches, so I don't see it as unfair
It can be unfair because the guy who plays a long match at night is put at a disadvantage compared to the guy who finishes at day time.We'll I've never complained when Rafa's played night matches, so I don't see it as unfair
I guess because Rafa plays a large portion of his matches at night, so its normal.
Well if someone has a problem with that, they are free to complain
My point is, there is no such thing as absolute fair in sports.Well if someone has a problem with that, they are free to complain
Well if someone has a problem with that, they are free to complain
