Moveforwardalways
Hall of Fame
Just received word. No year end ratings. Current rating will be valid through the end of 2021.
Agree with schmke.Yep, e-mail from USTA. Just wrote a summary and my thoughts on my blog.
I think it is a mistake, it will cause more problems than it will solve, but I do understand how it is the easy course of action so makes sense that is what the USTA did.
The FAQ they posted does indicate matches played in 2020 will be used for ongoing calculations and thus be part of a player's 2021 year-end rating. So players actual rating to the hundredth it appears won't be reset, just the level a player is eligible to play at remains the same as for 2020 (unless one's rating is now expired, in which case they have to self-rate again).
Exactly.What I expected, but I had hoped they would bump those that were clearly out of level (up and down) as well as give C ratings to any S rated player with at least 3 matches.
I have an S rate player that I will likely need to start hiding come Spring. crap.
I guess you can see some crazy strong teams come 2021.
Yeah, and then S rated players that were probably right on target that have improved a lot and may not be rated correctly.
I should have been bumped to 4.5 but I guess at least I will get a chance to go to nationals next year (if they are held)
says every good 4.0 in the countryI should have been bumped to 4.5 but I guess at least I will get a chance to go to nationals next year (if they are held)
Uh, I'm surprised that this is news today. I was told this by my LLC when we restarted our leagues back in June.
I guess I hadn't spent a lot of time thinking about this aspect. I know in our own club, we are talking about putting together a competitive team and a developmental team. The latter is more focused on evenly distributing play time to players. The former will try to put their strongest players in the line-up for each match. We have a couple players that were probably mid-upper end of their ratings that have improved. We also have a couple players (me included) that were surprised not to get bumped at the end of 2019.Don't forget that this knife cuts both ways. The bottom feeders of each level are also going to remain.
Request a bump down. Say you got "the virus". Guaranteed bump downI should have been bumped down to 4.0 (like 1 and 7 or 8 on the season). Was looking forward to playing on a particular 4.0 team nearby.
Request a bump down. Say you got "the virus". Guaranteed bump down
I do suspect the appeal button will work after Dec 1 and that it might be generous.
I doubt anything will change. Appeals will be done against your last year-end rating which hasn't changed.I have appealed down unsuccessfully 2 years in a row. Maybe they'll loosen up this year.
I doubt anything will change. Appeals will be done against your last year-end rating which hasn't changed.
Well, they did the _easy_ thing in this case.The USTA is reliable - they ALWAYS do the wrong thing.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, USTA programming across the U.S. has been severely disrupted, with play happening sporadically, or not at all in many Sections and Districts. In addition, 80% of all USTA League Section and District Championships and 100% of USTA League National Championships have been canceled in 2020.
While the NTRP system remains sound, given all of the impacts COVID-19 has had on play, the USTA has made the difficult decision not to run or publish year-end NTRP ratings for 2020.
I got a hat in the mail from the USTA. Nice to see my dues are being spent well. I think it’s made out of paper.
Ummm, easy solution, do year-end ratings and bump them up ...I also got a hat! I am very happy to get something. Seems nice enough and is embroidered not screen printed.
We have districts this week for 40+ and 18+ ... yes sectionals are cancelled but doing districts anyway.
While watching some matches, spoke with our LLC who indicated that they are considering reaching out to players who are clearly above level and encouraging them not to play at their C rated level next year ... even if there are no bumps. They are concerned that the levels are going to be really messed up next year.
Want an extra?On second thought I did get a hat from Net Generation b/c I’m registered as a coach. Maybe that qualifies as my hat from USTA. Also looks like it’s made out of cardboard.
Ummm, easy solution, do year-end ratings and bump them up ...
The silly thing is, if they just did year-end ratings based on player's dynamic rating at year-end, it would probably all work out.captain obvious.
USTA made the right move in allowing each district to follow local health dept guidelines as to whether to reopen.
In my mind, if an area is playing league that district should be subject to bumps. But as usual, no one asked me.
I think it is great that no rankings will be calculated/set. A lot of the teams in our flight brought in self rated sandbaggers that dumped matches knowing that there are no playoffs planned this year. Their thinking was dump 3 matches this year with no playoffs, get a C rating, and then good to go next year.
Now those guys will be S rated next year and risk mid season bump ups.
I think it is great that no rankings will be calculated/set. A lot of the teams in our flight brought in self rated sandbaggers that dumped matches knowing that there are no playoffs planned this year. Their thinking was dump 3 matches this year with no playoffs, get a C rating, and then good to go next year.
Now those guys will be S rated next year and risk mid season bump ups.
This.Those dumped matches aren't thrown out so are already decreasing their chances of getting strikes in 2021.
USTA FAQs regarding Coronavirus and COVID-19
Find answers to frequently asked questions about the USTA's response regarding COVID-19, including information on playing tennis safely, events, leagues and NTRP ratings. Learn more.www.usta.com
"However, matches played will continue to calculate toward a player’s rating and will be used in the 2021 year-end rating calculation and publication."
Want an extra?
Sandbaggers are going to sandbag.
Those dumped matches aren't thrown out so are already decreasing their chances of getting strikes in 2021.
USTA FAQs regarding Coronavirus and COVID-19
Find answers to frequently asked questions about the USTA's response regarding COVID-19, including information on playing tennis safely, events, leagues and NTRP ratings. Learn more.www.usta.com
"However, matches played will continue to calculate toward a player’s rating and will be used in the 2021 year-end rating calculation and publication."
You sure? I’ll through in pack of gum?Lol, I’m good. Thanks though.
Reading this and realizing that a team in our 18+ flight probably tried the same thing. He had few guys who were pretty clearly self-rated too low, and he played them only in a few doubles matches where they lost several games. His normal plan would be to unleash them at singles during sectionals/nationals and trust that they'd run out of time for 3 strikes and DQ. This year with sectionals cancelled he was probably hoping they'd get locked in with C rating so he would not have to worry about DQ at all in 2021. Now he'll have to play the hiding game again.
Actually, as I understand it a strike is an individual match and not a total aggregate of results. I.e. If in the last 3 matches I beat guys 0,0 that I am supposed to beat that is not aggregating to making me strike out so to speak. However, if I beat a guy 0,0 that the software thinks I am not supposed to beat.... bing..bing..bing. I get a strike.
So my point is that these guys are going to keep their S rating next year and 3 strikes next year will result in an automatic bump up and all those wins will flip to losses. If this years matches counted they would be C rated next year and all those strikes would simply mean those big wins will lead to a bump up at the end of next year but would not lead to a dq and flip in result.
You sure? I’ll through in pack of gum?
Yeah, cardboard just like the racquets they give us to lend to these kids we coach.On second thought I did get a hat from Net Generation b/c I’m registered as a coach. Maybe that qualifies as my hat from USTA. Also looks like it’s made out of cardboard.
Exactly.
Self-rates are often going to improve as they play more and bump ups are not uncommon. But when that doesn't happen when it should have, and their first year essentially becomes 2 years, their continued improvement puts them at risk of being DQ'd unless they tank games and manage their rating. So the USTA has just put players in the position of having to self-opt to only play up, risk a DQ affecting their team, or cheat the system by managing their rating.
You are right that it is doubtful someone goes from 3.0 to 4.0 in one year, but while not common, it can happen in two years and by making the rating period 2 years, the USTA is increasing the chances it happens.But players generally know when they've improved enough to move to the next level. They always have the opportunity to play up a level and play at the level of their actual ability to avoid a bump. It's doubtful anyone is legitimately going from 3.0 to 4.0 in one year based on natural progression.
You are right that it is doubtful someone goes from 3.0 to 4.0 in one year, but while not common, it can happen in two years and by making the rating period 2 years, the USTA is increasing the chances it happens.
And even if a 3.0S doesn't get bumped up to 4.0 at 2021 year-end, they very well may be bumped up to 3.5 and be playing at a solid 3.5 level during 2021, but be eligible to play 3.0. Yes, they can recognize this and only play 3.5 in 2021, but many won't, either because they like winning at 3.0 or by being pressured by a 3.0 captain to play 3.0 and manage their rating. If the point of the NTRP system is to promote fair and competitive play, it would seem publishing 2020 year-end ratings for the self-rates that played enough would have been a good idea to avoid this situation and not require a player to opt to only play up.