So heavily declined 34.75 year old Federer loses to heavily declined Nadal on the surface that peak Nadal was beating peak Fed anyways and that tells us that prime/peak Federer couldn't whup heavily declined Nadal?Ideally I'd like to see Nadal beat Federer in the semi and lose to Djokovic in the final
Then maybe we'll stop hearing about how Federer could also beat a "heavily declined" Nadal if given the chance
Novak Djokovic said after winning the Australian Open that he is very hungry to triumph at Roland Garros.
Still hungry for more titles despite all the recent success - 2016 AO champion Novak Djokovic
The best player in the world defeated Andy Murray in the AO final 3-0 (6-1, 7-5, 7-6(3)) in a bit less than three hours of play.
During the press conference he used a sentence that says that it is harder for a wolf to remain at the top of the mountain than climbing it.
In that way he compared himself and other players who are chasing him, saying that the wolf is still hungry for success.
"I heard a very good metaphor - it is a lot easier for the wolf who is running uphill to reach the top of the mountain. It is not easier, but he is hungrier than the wolf who is at the top", said Djokovic and then explained it further.
"You can look from different aspects. I believe that every week the boys are fighting to become the world number 1. They are hungry to become the best in the world and I know that. I cannot allow myself to relax and enjoy. I mean, I can, of course I want that and I will enjoy, but not more than a few days. After that I will think how to continue to play well at every next tournament. That is my reminder for everything that is needed for me to stay at the top. I think that you have to work twice as much when you reach this point".
How much is the wolf hungry for the title in Paris then?
"Very hungry, but the wolf must eat many different meals to reach Paris. Paris is a dessert".
After convincing triumphs against his biggest rivals, Djokovic lifted the AO trophy for a 6th time and is yet to lose a final in the Rod Laver Arena.
"It is a special tournament for me, that is why I kissed the court. I am in love with the Rod Laver Arena for a few years already and I hope it will last for a long time".
There is nothing like Plexicushion down under - 6 triumphs in as many finals there
Novak won his 11th Major title and also tied Roy Emerson who was the only tennis player to win AO six times. In front of Djokovic now only stand already mentioned Emerson with 12, Nadal and Sampras with 14, and Federer with 17 Grand Slams.
With this win, the Serbian also now has the equal number of hard court titles as Andre Agassi - 46. Only Federer remains in front with 60.
"Every Grand Slam title is special in its own way. This one is important because I managed to tie Roy Emerson with six titles at the Australian Open. I am really honored to be mentioned alongside legends of this sport like Bjorn Borg, Rod Laver and that I won the same number of Grand Slams as them. I cannot lie and say I didn't think about it. I went on the court and knew that I have a chance to write history. That was a big motivation for me and an imperative to play the best I can. I tried not to think too much about it, but it was my encouragement, positive support and goal".
Many were interested in knowing what is the recipe for constant success in the last few seasons.
"I cannot choose one segment and say that it is the secret of success, though I know people would want to know something and me to explain it to them. However, that is not easy because if we were talking about one or two things, many would do the same. It is obvious that it is many years of dedication, hard work and sacrifice. It is not just about trainings, it is not just about what you must do as a tennis player, it is also about the way of life. I am trying to dedicate a big part of my time, energy and thoughts to make myself the best possible person and best player I can be".
Djokovic said many times throughout his career that peace in his private life means a lot on the court.
"I realized something a few years ago that you cannot separate professional and private life. You are the same person. So all feelings who are maybe trapped inside you, the ones that burst in private life, all the problems you face... All of that must come to the surface, you have to find a solution. You have to directly face all your private problems in order to completely use the potential you have. At the end of the day, especially in these matches that are decided by a couple of points, when you are challenged by every aspect of yourself, if there is something under the surface, it will come out and be against you. That will be your biggest enemy. I am speaking only for myself because we are all different. This is not a formula for everybody's success, I am just saying something that helped me to understand how to become better and improve", concluded Djokovic.
after watching todays match im not sure. He was very tight at times and was going way behind the baseline as he did against Wawrinka in FO. He now has the added burden of the circus that will be following for the holding all 4 Majors. I think it comes down to Nadal. If Nadal gets some form, gets his aura back by wining a couple of tournaments then i think Djokovic will have a problem as Nadal obviously if feeling good is likely to want to silence his critics at his pet slam. A wounded wolf is very dangerousNah they are lions that have already climbed higher mountains and are now tired from all those battles.
Le mot juste!Where are the other wolves?
The only other wolves are either grey (Fed) or lost their claws (Rafa).
Translation: he filled the ears of the journalists and reporters present with ear-**** for about 30 minutes.Really good press conference. To quote someone from the comment section:
More than just a conference. Novak shared some of the profound philosophies that keep him in a perfect harmony with karma, his body, his mind, the surrounding, resulting in a rich family life and tennis perfection made to look easy. Not everyone knows is that, beyond his daily rigorous and various training, he also does yoga and meditation to achieve this balanced state of mind, reflect on the present moment and remained properly focused on the future goals. I'm sure that this inner spiritual serenity is the key ingredient that takes him that much further.
I don’t want to allow myself to be in that frame of mind. If I do, the person becomes too arrogant and thinks that he’s a higher being or better than everybody else. You can get a big slap from karma very soon. I don’t want that.”
Djokovic's one loss against 'Fedal' in 2011 was at Roland Garros.
Djokovic double-faulted on match point in the 2012 final of Roland Garros.
Djokovic seemed on the verge of victory after going up a break in the 5th set, but ran into the net and eventually lost the game/match in the 2013 semis of Roland Garros.
Djokovic was prime to win in 2014, facing a Nadal who lost to Ferrer at Monte Carlo, Almagro at Barcelona, and who Nole had beaten at Rome. But he lost (with another double-fault on match point) in the final of Roland Garros.
Djokovic finally beat nemesis Nadal in 2015, but lost to Wawrinka with a lackluster performance in the final of Roland Garros.
In 2016, along with the pressure of being the clear favorite to win the elusive Roland Garros title (a pressure he hasn't handled all that well), there will be the added pressure of winning the 'Djokovic Slam'. Can he do it? Of course. Will he do it? Unlikely.
pete was like bambi on ice, djoker's been to 3 finals already. just so happens he played the greatest clay courter of all time, and an inspired wawrinka.He will it at least once!Novak will NEVER win French open. RAFA and Stan will see to that. Pete never won French, Lendl never won wimby. only GOAT can win all 4 and there is ONLY ONE King Federer.
I sense you're not a Novak fan, Duane. Am I wrong?
Whether I am or not isn't the point. Regardless of how dominant Djokovic is or has been, or how invincible he seems or has seemed, he's been unable to win Roland Garros, and I don't think he will in 2016.
I hear the king is quite fond of the bread sticks down undah?Novak will NEVER win French open. RAFA and Stan will see to that. Pete never won French, Lendl never won wimby. only GOAT can win all 4 and there is ONLY ONE King Federer.
How dare you defy the KING of ALL GOATS. Federer will give him triple bagel in Wimbledon final this year.I hear the king is quite fond of the bread sticks down undah?
Nole had to wait for Nadal to get into semi-retirement to beat him. One can look at this many ways.Nadal lost to Djokovic at FO by the way. How many times has Federer beaten Nadal at FO?
Nah they are lions that have already climbed higher mountains and are now tired from all those battles.
The other wolves are actually cute labradors who are happy to follow the wolf and pick up any leftovers.
Come on dude, you are much more handsome than him. I love Novak, but he looks a bit like a hedgehog (not saying he is ugly, just I cant help but thinking of that and it is funny, just like Nadal reminds me of a Caprera). You are definitely 1 of the top 3 hottest guys I have ever seen (and I am straight, dont worry, not hitting on you, haha). Your cuteness compensates for his greatness in his field, so you would be a perfect pair.
Well forgive me for having doubts about him winning a tournament he failed to win yet. Stan is a mystery, Rafa is always dangerous on clay, while Murray has also improved on that surface.
Sampras?djokovic is 6-0 in australian open finals
second only to nadal 9-0 french open finals
Sampras?
Along with Bjorn borg who is 6-0 in FO finals.djokovic is 6-0 in australian open finals
second only to nadal 9-0 french open finals
Djokovic's one loss against 'Fedal' in 2011 was at Roland Garros.
Djokovic double-faulted on match point in the 2012 final of Roland Garros.
Djokovic seemed on the verge of victory after going up a break in the 5th set, but ran into the net and eventually lost the game/match in the 2013 semis of Roland Garros.
Djokovic was prime to win in 2014, facing a Nadal who lost to Ferrer at Monte Carlo, Almagro at Barcelona, and who Nole had beaten at Rome. But he lost (with another double-fault on match point) in the final of Roland Garros.
Djokovic finally beat nemesis Nadal in 2015, but lost to Wawrinka with a lackluster performance in the final of Roland Garros.
In 2016, along with the pressure of being the clear favorite to win the elusive Roland Garros title (a pressure he hasn't handled all that well), there will be the added pressure of winning the 'Djokovic Slam'. Can he do it? Of course. Will he do it? Unlikely.
I hope Fedal meet in the QF and then Nadwarinka in the SF. In the final Nadal beaten by Djokovic.Ideally I'd like to see Nadal beat Federer in the semi and lose to Djokovic in the final
Then maybe we'll stop hearing about how Federer could also beat a "heavily declined" Nadal if given the chance
Along with Bjorn borg who is 6-0 in FO finals.