Of the 14 biggest tournaments in tennis, will Djokovic have won more of each of the big tournaments?

[McEnroeisanartist]

Of the 14 biggest tournaments in tennis, do you think when Federer/Nadal/Djokovic's careers are over, Djokovic will have dominated more tournaments than the other two?

Currently, Federer has won more than Nadal and Djokovic at 5 of the tournaments.
3rd Clay Masters, Wimbledon, US Open, ATP Tour Finals, Cincinnati,

Djokovic has won more than Federer and Nadal at 6 of the tournaments.
Australian Open, Indian Wells, Miami, Canada, 1st Indoor, and Paris

Nadal has won more than Federer and Djokovic at 3 of the tournaments.
Monte Carlo, Rome, French Open

Federer is currently 1 from tying Djokovic at Australian Open, Indian Wells, and 1st Indoor.

Djokovic is currently 1 from tying Federer at ATP Tour Finals.

Nadal is currently 1 title from tying Djokovic at Canada

 

[Deleted member 743561]

Can't comment at great length right now but is Rogers Cup (Canada) really even one tournament? Held in two different cities with different court compositions.

 

[Mainad]

Can't comment at great length right now but is Rogers Cup (Canada) really even one tournament? Held in two different cities with different court compositions.

Well, you have 'Le Coupe Rogers' played in Montréal and and 'The Rogers Cup' played in Toronto in alternating years and both played on hardcourts. If they were treated as separate tournaments, would the winner of one get to keep his ranking points for 2 years before having to defend them?

 

[Deleted member 743561]

Well, you have 'Le Coupe Rogers' played in Montréal and and 'The Rogers Cup' played in Toronto in alternating years and both played on hardcourts. If they were treated as separate tournaments, would the winner of one get to keep his ranking points for 2 years before having to defend them?

I mean, I get the technicality... dual sites, under a shared bilingual banner or whatever. But they don't play identically. And I don't think the dimensions of the playing area (beyond the court) are the same. I don't know that I would include it in a tally, for practical purposes.

 

[NEW_BORN]

I mean, I get the technicality... dual sites, under a shared bilingual banner or whatever. But they don't play identically. And I don't think the dimensions of the playing area (beyond the court) are the same. I don't know that I would include it in a tally, for practical purposes.

I've always viewed them as different tournaments for the exact reasons you've mentioned.
Just like the Masters Cup should be viewed differently to the Year-End Championships imo.

 

[SinjinCooper]

Did you mean to say, "four biggest tournaments?" Because there are only four big tournaments worth tabulating dominance for.

 

[acintya]

ah please, stop with djoko

 

[Charlie]

Did you mean to say, "four biggest tournaments?" Because there are only four big tournaments worth tabulating dominance for.

Funny because until late January it was three, with Australian Open being irrelevant.

What an unpredictable twist from you!

 

[Cenarius]

Get real, Federer won't win anything beyond a 500 for the remainder of his career.

 

[falstaff78]

Get real, Federer won't win anything beyond a 500 for the remainder of his career.

Love these kinds of comments. Easily falsifiable. But will take another 4-5 years to come true.

Saved for posterity.

 

[Noelan]

I've always viewed them as different tournaments for the exact reasons you've mentioned.
Just like the Masters Cup should be viewed differently to the Year-End Championships imo.

What a nonsense. Tournament is played in two different cities in the same country , same surface DecoTurf II. Maybe you wish that Canada has two Masters tournaments, or having some other agenda behind it.

Djokovic needs two Cinci and one RG, which is doable. Whether he will win it remains to be seen

 

[onehandbh]

Results at the 14 biggest tournaments?

That's not what the top 10 ATP care about. It's all about the number of wins in itf futures tournaments.

 

[Deleted member 3771]

Shokavish hasn't won very many of the most prestigious tournaments with at least a bo5 final compared to other great players.

 

[Noelan]

As soon as he showed some of his old good form(we don't even know if he will contnue with it until RG which I belive is his 2017 goal), the same stories and same simpeton posts and posters are back

 

[thrust]

What a nonsense. Tournament is played in two different cities in the same country , same surface DecoTurf II. Maybe you wish that Canada has two Masters tournaments, or having some other agenda behind it.

Djokovic needs two Cinci and one RG, which is doable. Whether he will win it remains to be seen

Correct, they are the same tournament, to say otherwise, is Nonsense.

 

[Cenarius]

Love these kinds of comments. Easily falsifiable. But will take another 4-5 years to come true.

Saved for posterity.

Do you really think Federer is going to be winning master 1000 titles say in 3 years time? Assuming he's still playing of course.

 

[KINGROGER]

Arbitrary and irrelevant stat tbh.

 

[falstaff78]

Get real, Federer won't win anything beyond a 500 for the remainder of his career.

Do you really think Federer is going to be winning master 1000 titles say in 3 years time? Assuming he's still playing of course.

I think your second statement is very different from your first one.

 

[Cenarius]

I think your second statement is very different from your first one.

Not really.In the first one I gave you my opinion and in the second one I ask to elaborate yours.

 

[falstaff78]

Not really.In the first one I gave you my opinion and in the second one I ask to elaborate yours.

I don't have an opinion about 3 years from now.

 

[Cenarius]

I don't have an opinion about 3 years from now.

Ok.

 

[falstaff78]

Get real, Federer won't win anything beyond a 500 for the remainder of his career.

Ahem

 

[GabeT]

Arbitrary and irrelevant stat tbh.

Arbitrary, yes. But hardly irrelevant. These are the tournaments where the top players face each other.

 

[Cenarius]

Ahem

Ok I was kinda wrong, maybe more 1000 are in his future but I am sure he is done winning slams in singles.I would bet anything on it.

 

[falstaff78]

Ok I was kinda wrong, maybe more 1000 are in his future but I am sure he is done winning slams in singles.I would bet anything on it.

Preserved for future trolling

 

[Cenarius]

Preserved for future trolling

I don't think so.Took him nearly 5 years to win another slam and It will get harder by the day.

 

[falstaff78]

I don't think so.Took him nearly 5 years to win another slam and It will get harder by the day.

You doubling down here buddy!

 

[BeatlesFan]

Get real, Federer won't win anything beyond a 500 for the remainder of his career.

 

[Cenarius]

You doubling down here buddy!

Sorry.No pun intended there.I'm not a native speaker.My English is lousy at times.Sometimes I wish the international part of TT were in Spanish instead.

 

[Cenarius]

Is that woman judge judy? Sorry I only have basic cable in my country.

 

[MasturB]

Do you really think Federer is going to be winning master 1000 titles say in 3 years time? Assuming he's still playing of course.

If he's still playing then yes.

 

[falstaff78]

Sorry.No pun intended there.I'm not a native speaker.My English is lousy at times.Sometimes I wish the international part of TT were in Spanish instead.

I meant to say, you are going double or nothing on your bet! another way of saying your conviction was unaffected by the fact that Feddy bear just won IW!

 

[Cenarius]

If he's still playing then yes.

I would like to be that optimist.

 

[Cenarius]

I meant to say, you are going double or nothing on your bet! another way of saying your conviction was unaffected by the fact that Feddy bear just won IW!

How do you double "anything"?

 

[Sereger]

Update plz