TennisFrkJC92
Rookie
I've used the PDR for the past year and i just got the APDC and i tried it out yesterday. I liked both racquets but for different reasons.
I think i liked the PDR better but i think this is because my playing style has been fitted to this racquet. When i tried APDC, i loved the massive spin and how it helped keep all of my shots in no matter how hard i hit it. However, the serving was off. This is probably because the serving style is different between these two racquets. And it was hard to get good depth with the APDC because the topspin made the ball drop only a few feet from the net.
PDR: More Power, Better Serves, More depth in shots, More control in placement
APDC: More Spin, More consistency b/c the topspin keeps almost every shot in.
Do you think this evaluation is accurate or should i play with the APDC some more, get used to it, and then make the final judgement call?
I think i liked the PDR better but i think this is because my playing style has been fitted to this racquet. When i tried APDC, i loved the massive spin and how it helped keep all of my shots in no matter how hard i hit it. However, the serving was off. This is probably because the serving style is different between these two racquets. And it was hard to get good depth with the APDC because the topspin made the ball drop only a few feet from the net.
PDR: More Power, Better Serves, More depth in shots, More control in placement
APDC: More Spin, More consistency b/c the topspin keeps almost every shot in.
Do you think this evaluation is accurate or should i play with the APDC some more, get used to it, and then make the final judgement call?