Tecnifibre TFight 300 Dynacore vs. 315 Variant???

[stylez_911]

Hi everyone,

Though I know that there are multiple threads on the new TFight Dynacore line; however, I am interested particularly in the specs of the 300 vs 315 as they represent the open string patterns and i'm debating between the two. The TW playtesters did a great job on the reviews they provided; however, the 300 variant was not part of them...

I apologize in advance for seeming ignorant at all or for overlooking other threads that may touch upon these points (please bare with me).

Now, first of all I want to mention that I am more of a recreational player and I live in Canada, and since Tecnifibre is not really available in local tennis racquet retail shops, I cannot demo Tecnifibre frames - so I would REALLY appreciate some help better understanding what the pros and cons of the frame variations would be.

I am more of a baseline player that relies on heavy topspin on my groundstrokes.

I prefer not to customize my racquets with lead, so I'm hoping for someone to elaborate on what I can expect regarding the differences in the 300 vs 315. For reference, here are the key specs for both (strung):

Dynacore 300

Head Size: 98 sq. in. / 632.26 sq. cm.
Length: 27in / 68.58cm
Strung Weight: 11.2oz / 317.51g
Balance: 13in / 33.02cm / 4 pts HL
Swingweight: 316
Stiffness: 68
Beam Width: 21.5mm / 22mm / 22mm /

Dynacore 315

Head Size: 98 sq. in. / 632.26 sq. cm.
Length: 27in / 68.58cm
Strung Weight: 11.6oz / 331.69g
Balance: 12.6in / 32cm / 7 pts HL
Swingweight: 311
Stiffness: 67
Beam Width: 22mm / 22.5mm / 22.5mm /

--

Once again, I am a baseline player that plays with heavy topspin, so I don't mind a lighter frame in general; however, I also would like to make sure there is enough mass so as to have enough stability to not get pushed around. I can supply my own power most of the time, so that isn't as much an issue to me. I also would prefer the option that is friendlier on the arm and a 1 pt Stiffness difference may or may not be noticeable, so I guess the string choice and tension would come into play there?

The beam width, strung weight, and SW of the 300 are more attractive to me, but the 7pt headlight balance and 67 flex of the 315 are also attractive.

Would somebody please help put things into perspective for me by comparing the specs of both and how they might feel on court in different situations? (ie. serves, spin potential, volleys, stability, power etc.).

Also, as access to spin, comfort, controllable power and durability are also important to me, some suggestions for string setups for these frames would also be highly welcome.

Thanks everyone in advance

 

[spinovic]

The 315 is a fast, spin-friendly racquet. It has the modern, stiff feel, but is comfortable.

I intended to try the 300, but never got around to it.

My hope/guess was that the similar SW would mean the frames would be pretty similar in terms of power and stability, while the lighter static weight of the 300 would make it even faster.

I guess the fear would be that the lighter weight would be noticeable with regard to stability.

I think the 300 would be pretty good. I figured at worst I could add a leather grip and some lead to get it up to the 315 specs, but I know you said you didn't want to customize.

 

[Irvin]

Many think the lighter weight of the 300 would make it easier to swing but because the balance is higher the SW is higher making it a bit harder to swing.

Besides the Dynacore there are three other 315 models from Tecnifibre. The 315 Ltd is 95 si and comes in 16 or 18 main versions and the frames are more flexible, while the TFlash version is 100 si and has a stiffer frame.

 

[stylez_911]

Spinovic:

Thanks for your reply and thoughts. I too am thinking the frames would play similarly with the 300 being potentially fractionally less stable.

I like the whippiness and maneuverability of a headlight racquet (which the 300 and 315 are, with the edge going to the 315). However; being 4 pts headlight and static weight of the 300, that would probably cut through the air really quick and feel quite headlight as well?

Would the difference in 0.5 mm from the beam thickness make any noticeable difference in terms of feel or stability or power in your opinion?

Irvin:

I am thinking the same thing about the SW of the 300, but since it is still 4 pt headlight, it would be pretty whippy and maneuverable anyways and I can always put a leather grip on that as well to make it even more HL if needed ( i just don't really want to deal with lead at the moment).

Regarding the other 315 models, the 2013 Ltd is actually 98 sq. in. and I am also strongly considering that as well since I would like to have a flexier alternative and I hear that the 315 Ltd. 16 m is something really special!

 

[Irvin]

I guess the best thing to do is just use the TW specs to compare the 300 with the four 315 rackets.

 

[stylez_911]

I guess the best thing to do is just use the TW specs to compare the 300 with the four 315 rackets.

Looks like the 300 dynacore offers a bit more power, possibly due to the weight distribution difference having a slightly higher swingweight due to the lower HL balance.

On paper I sort of have an idea of what to expect, but it would just be great to hear it from someone who has experienced both the Dynacore 300 and 315 in stock form how they differ in stability, maneuverability, spin potential and overall performance.

 

[Irvin]

Looks like the 300 dynacore offers a bit more power, possibly due to the weight distribution difference having a slightly higher swingweight due to the lower HL balance.

On paper I sort of have an idea of what to expect, but it would just be great to hear it from someone who has experienced both the Dynacore 300 and 315 in stock form how they differ in stability, maneuverability, spin potential and overall performance.

The 300 is still HL but of the five it is the lightest and HH of all. If you want power I would try the TFlash. It is the heaviest, stiffest, and has the largest head.