Tennis Umpire sues USTA for racial discrimination

guanzishou

G.O.A.T.

Laura Wagner

Yesterday 12:01pm
Filed to: USTA
10.3K
352
ny3lqobqrxq7ceqlgui5.jpg

Photo: Tony Nimmons at the 2012 U.S.
Photo: Clive Brunskill (Getty)
Tony Nimmons, a black chair umpire, is suing the U.S. Tennis Association for racial discrimination and is seeking reinstatement to his USTA position as well as compensatory damages, according to a complaint filed Friday in federal court for the Eastern District of New York. The lawsuit was filed after the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued the rare finding, in June 2017, that there was “reasonable cause to believe” the USTA had discriminated and retaliated against Nimmons. In January of this year, the EEOC issued a “right to sue” on the basis of the claims.


EEOC Sides With Black Chair Umpire Who Said U.S. Tennis Association Discriminated Against Him
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has determined that there was “reasonable cause to…

Read more


ADVERTISEMENT



Nimmons, who as Deadspin reported last year, is a certified silver-badge umpire with experience working major tournaments around the world, including all four grand slams, with the USTA’s own website calling him “one of the best in the sport,” said he dealt with racist abuse and derogatory language while he was at the USTA, and faced retaliation when he brought his complaints to his superiors. From the lawsuit:

During the 2013 US Open in New York City, a Caucasian USTA umpire, said, “Hey Tony, if you were a hungry monkey and I told you there was a watermelon in the tree – go get it! How would you feel?”

At a USTA Challenger event in Dallas, Texas in 2012, a Caucasian umpire yelled, “Tony, you should go back to the ghetto!” This same Caucasian umpire yelled, “Run ******, Run!” while watching a track meet. Unfortunately, even after so many complaints of racism, Plaintiff personally heard his manager, Bruce Littrell, say of the same Caucasian umpire, that he, “is a good person and he deserves to be at the US Open.”

At a USTA Challenger in Sacramento, CA in 2010, a Caucasian player yelled, “Schwarze scheisse!”, which means “Black S*it” in German. The USTA generally refuses to remove, or even reprimand, racist players or officials. After each one of these incidents and on numerous other occasions, Plaintiff filed complaints.

ADVERTISEMENT




The lawsuit also alleges that Nimmons, who was hired as a full-time employee in 2009 to promote diversity at the USTA—three years after the New York Attorney General’s Office concluded that the organization had failed to adhere to state labor laws as well as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964—was forced out of his job because of his his internal and EEOC complaints. From the lawsuit, in Nimmons’s own words:

Like many other African Americans, women and other minorities, the USTA has treated me badly because of who I am, the color of my skin. In addition to the daily abuse that I never saw Caucasian male employees experience, I was called a “monkey”. I was told to return to the “ghetto.” I even heard and reported to the USTA that a hangman’s noose hung near the desk of another African-American employee at the Billie Jean King National Tennis Center. Rather than call the police or bring back the Attorney General to investigatethis ongoing racism, I understand the USTA did nothing.

In response to my pleas to end the race discrimination against me and conduct an independent investigation, I was stripped of my work – including my diversity duties and travel to the Grand Slams tennis tournaments (e.g., the Australian Open, French Open-Roland Garros, Wimbledon and the US Open), to promote diversity, and where I had otherwise officiated with approval for decades.

I was further retaliated against and transferred to a job as a video editor without any training. Many African Americans or women at the USTA who have complained of discrimination have either been terminated or have been so abused that they quit. Few minorities are willing to risk being kicked out of tennis and have to endure the racism and other discrimination. Myself, when I complained, I was forced out of tennis by USTA management.

ADVERTISEMENT




Via spokesman Chris Widmaier, the USTA categorically denied Nimmons’s allegations and said in a statement to Deadspin: “The EEOC did not conduct a full and comprehensive investigation. The agency did not contact or speak to any USTA witnesses as a part of its review process. As a result, the facts alleged by Mr. Nimmons were not adequately tested and the issues raised were not fully aired or considered.”

The EEOC, which is prohibited under federal law from discussing, confirming, or denying the existence of any discrimination charge filings or investigations unless and until the EEOC files a lawsuit, could not comment on the specific nature of its USTA investigation. However, an EEOC spokeswoman said that an EEOC investigation generally includes the offer of mediation between the employer and the complainant, and if that is unsuccessful, the EEOC usually undertakes an investigation. The spokeswoman said that in a typical investigation, the EEOC first gives the employer a chance to provide a position statement in which it responds to the charges of discrimination. The EEOC then reviews the position statement to determine further investigative steps, which can include interviewing people from the employer, such as management and coworkers, as well as the charging party. Typical investigations also include requesting evidence like documents or computerized records, holding fact-finding conferences with both sides, and visiting the employment site.

Nimmons’s lawyer Gary Ireland responded to the USTA’s claim:

“It is disappointing that the USTA would malign the EEOC and its professional staff of investigators who worked for two-and-a-half years on the claims of wide-spread racism and retaliation by the USTA. The EEOC even addresses the callous claim by the USTA that the hangman’s noose at the Billie Jean King National Tennis Center, claiming the noose—the most vile symbolism of racism —was some sort of joke.

ADVERTISEMENT




Ireland is referring to this “reasonable cause” determination document from June 2017. In the determination, which cites documentary evidence as well as the USTA’s response to the allegations, the USTA said the noose “was not related to race but was a poor [sic] conceived joke relating to difficult vendors.”


Nimmons and his lawyer are calling on Attorney General Eric Schneiderman to reopen his office’s 2006 investigation of the USTA and on the New York City Council to investigate the claims of discrimination at USTA’s tennis center in Flushing Meadows (the Billie Jean King National Tennis Center), which is a New York City public park.
 

guanzishou

G.O.A.T.
EEOC Sides With Black Chair Umpire Who Said U.S. Tennis Association Discriminated Against Him

Laura Wagner

8/29/17 3:00pm
Filed to: USTA
19.4K
289
hbl4kmkbhgdozrwrh3hf.jpg

Photo: Tony Nimmons at the 2012 U.S. Open (Clive Brunskill/Getty)
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has determined that there was “reasonable cause to believe” that the country’s premier tennis organization discriminated against Tony Nimmons, a black chair umpire, “on account of his race and him engaging in a protected activity,” according to documents obtained by Deadspin. In his EEOC filings, Nimmons said he experienced repeated discrimination and, when he lodged complaints about it, was demoted. The determination is the latest in a series of discrimination complaints bought in recent years against the U.S. Tennis Association, which runs the U.S. Open as well as other programs.


The EEOC recommended in its June determination letter “conference, conciliation, and persuasion” in order to “eliminate the alleged unlawful employment practices.”



ADVERTISEMENT



Nimmons is a certified silver-badge umpire and has worked at major tournaments around the world, including all four grand slams, with the USTA’s own website calling him is “one of the best in the sport.” He filed two charges of discrimination with the EEOC, one in January 2015 and another in November 2015. The EEOC filings allege that the USTA discriminated against him on the basis of race and then retaliated against him by demoting him after he lodged complaints. The second one, from November, lists dozens of other women and minorities employed by the USTA who have, it says, filed discrimination complaints to the EEOC or internally with USTA. (The lines were already in the documents as provided to Deadspin.)

vfpdg0ef9thsabexww2u.png


According to Nimmons’s first EEOC filing, he was hired as a full-time employee in 2009 to promote diversity at the USTA—three years after the New York Attorney General’s Office concluded that the organization had failed to adhere to state labor laws as well as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The attorney general’s investigation found that there were “glaring gender disparities” between female and male chair umpires that “cannot be explained by differences in the qualifications of female and male chair umpires,” according to the 2006 assurance of discontinuance. The investigation also found, per the assurance, that “few minority umpires have been selected to chair matches at the U.S. Open, especially the more prestigious later-round matches.”

ADVERTISEMENT



Nimmons was hired with the title “coordinator of officials,” according to his initial EEOC filing, and he was supposed to “promote diversity and inculsion.” Nimmons told me in an interview that that also meant soothing employees who felt marginalized.

“On a number of occasions, I was tasked with calling people who had complaints about the officiating department or about one of our people in leadership to talk with them and see if there was anything I could do,” Nimmons told me. “They may have known what my position was, and the feeling was in the office that they just needed to vent on most occasions. And if we could just give them an ear, talk them off the ledge, that would help them. And on a number of occasions, making those calls and going to visit those people did help certain situations.”

Nimmons said in the initial charge of discrimination that he repeatedly filed complaints with his superiors at USTA and requested investigations into possible acts of discrimination, including when a black woman who worked for the USTA found a noose near her work area.

eptcag7gpdxo72zokqb7.png




The USTA said that the noose “was not related to race but was a poor [sic] conceived joke relating to difficult vendors,” according to the determination letter. In the November filing, Nimmons gave other examples of “hurtful comments.”

iliqnjppqmnyz0sezmqh.jpg




After filing his discrimination complaints internally and with the EEOC, Nimmons, who is represented by attorney Gary Ireland, said in the amended filing that he was banned from traveling, compromising his ability “to speak about diversity in tennis,” as well as excluded from office meetings.

rxykvjdo2za8dq7wwlyt.png


Nimmons told me that he was relieved of his duties last summer, after years of filing complaints internally and with the EEOC.

ADVERTISEMENT



I reached out to six former and current chair umpires about the their work at USTA, including former top chair umpire Cecil Hollins, who—after he was stripped of his gold, silver, bronze, and white umpire badges for asking why he and other top-ranked women and minority chair umpires were not given the chance to umpire finals at the U.S. Open—sued the USTA in 2005. None of the people I reached out to responded to my calls. Nimmons said he wasn’t surprised by that.

“Simply put, they’re afraid that the USTA are going to retaliate. For all of the statements [USTA] makes about not retaliating and no discrimination, what you have here is a situation where the EEOC and the New York Attorney General have found that against them. ... The people who have complaints have seen what is happening to me, they’re a little afraid,” Nimmons said. “[USTA] is a Goliath and they can’t be defeated, USTA is invincible—this is a perception that’s out there.”

Nimmons, who now works as a nuclear officer at Indian Point Energy Center in New York and volunteers as as emergency medical technician, said he’s more disappointed than angry about his situation with the USTA. He said he would “consider helping the USTA fix this problem in a heartbeat,” despite his dealings with the organization.

ADVERTISEMENT



“I gave 20-plus years of my life to officiating and trying to make it a better place for everyone to work,” he said. “If they are not interested in me helping them, I hope they’ll get someone that will help because this is a problem that has been going on forever.”

When asked the EEOC’s findings, USTA spokesperson Chris Widmaier issued the following statement:

The USTA does not permit discrimination or retaliation in its workplace on any basis, and investigates and takes prompt and appropriate action when such complaints are made. Although the USTA does not comment on pending claims, we can state that the matters raised by Mr. Nimmons were fully investigated, both internally and by an independent third party, and found to be specious. The USTA therefore is vigorously defending against these claims.
 
Last edited:

sureshs

Bionic Poster
It is not surprising given the lack of diversity at the top of the USTA, but the way they retaliated is very scary. This is precisely why big government is needed. If the EEOC had not intervened, this whole matter would have been swept under the rug. No wonder the racists that define one political party are so against the EEOC.
 

sureshs

Bionic Poster
I hope they end up paying out millions of dollars like they did to Bushy after claiming that leaving slippery floors unwiped after cleaning was OK when players were still using the facilities. There also they claimed innocence and then settled when they saw the case headed to the jury with full evidence of negligence.

When I watch the tennis commentators on Tennis Channel or ESPN, it is very clear that there is no diversity and some of the commentators seem to have gotten the job purely through contacts. Entire tennis industry seems to be this way. There are some positive signs like Katrina Adams and James Blake holding top positions but the overall attitude seems to be to have some token representation while keeping the power structure intact.
 
It is not surprising given the lack of diversity at the top of the USTA, but the way they retaliated is very scary. This is precisely why big government is needed. If the EEOC had not intervened, this whole matter would have been swept under the rug.

No wonder the racists that define one political party are so against the EEOC.
One party? . Try all, spanky. .

Or better yet, .come back when you are capable of discussing anything with a scintilla of nuanced thought vs. your usual sweeping, assumptive (and woefully naive) generalizations.

back on-topic: . surely they should fry the USTA for this.​
 

FrontHeadlock

Hall of Fame
During the 2013 US Open in New York City, a Caucasian USTA umpire, said, “Hey Tony, if you were a hungry monkey and I told you there was a watermelon in the tree – go get it! How would you feel?”

At a USTA Challenger event in Dallas, Texas in 2012, a Caucasian umpire yelled, “Tony, you should go back to the ghetto!” This same Caucasian umpire yelled, “Run ******, Run!” while watching a track meet. Unfortunately, even after so many complaints of racism, Plaintiff personally heard his manager, Bruce Littrell, say of the same Caucasian umpire, that he, “is a good person and he deserves to be at the US Open.”

At a USTA Challenger in Sacramento, CA in 2010, a Caucasian player yelled, “Schwarze scheisse!”, which means “Black S*it” in German. The USTA generally refuses to remove, or even reprimand, racist players or officials. After each one of these incidents and on numerous other occasions, Plaintiff filed complaints.

That youngster has quite an imagination!
 
C

Chadillac

Guest
Any witnesses or like the others where only one person hears something with 12 other ppl on the court
 

a10best

Hall of Fame
No. I don't want to be the cop out who says that every one is bad so that he can be a favorite in any group of drinking buddies.

It is called cowardice.
I don't care for either party but yeah, not ALL are bad to the core.
 
Last edited:

Bartelby

Bionic Poster
In America, unfortunately, social discrimination plays itself out mostly as individual legal action against, in this case, an employer.

Organisations love to put in place all the right policies, but then they usually protect the most powerful against any kind of complaint.

This seems to be the case here.
 
No. I don't want to be the cop out who says that every one is bad so that he can be a favorite in any group of drinking buddies.
It is called cowardice.
You're making my point.

And no, you don't get to arbitrarily and selectively brand people racist especially when it's based not on an absolute standard. . That is called demagoguery.
 
In America, unfortunately, social discrimination plays itself out mostly as individual legal action against, in this case, an employer.

Organisations love to put in place all the right policies, but then they usually protect the most powerful against any kind of complaint.

This seems to be the case here.
 
Last edited:
Top