Fedforever
Hall of Fame
Funny how this forum doesnt mirror whats happening. Here one gets accused wearing tin foiled hats when questioning these obvious questions.
I had an unexpectedly civilized conversation on Twitter with someone promoting the conspiracy theory. In the end, you can't ever prove that a conspiracy didn't happen. But everything posited as evidence had an equally or much more likely innocent explanation. And we all know that if Cilic had chosen to practice indoors and Federer outdoors no one would have suggested that Cilic was privy to secret information that Federer wasn't. The organisers were in a no-win situation - have the roof open and a player collapses and they're accused of endangering the players health. Close the roof and they're favouring Federer. What if it had been a Nadal/Cilic final and the roof was closed when it's well known that Nadal prefers outdoor conditions? Would everyone then have said it was a conspiracy to favour Cilic?