TF320, MF200+. and Slaz NX One, are they same racquet??

[logansc]

It appears to me these racquets come from identical molds. Outside of differences in weight and balance, they all list at a 64 flex, beam size and head size do they all essentially feel the same as far as frame response? I know the string pattern will make a difference but I'm specifically talking about the 16x20 TF 320 with the MF200+ and the Type II NX One. Thoughts? Feedback?

 

[nyc]

Personally, I thought the MF200 played very differently to the TF320, much harsher than the flex rating suggests. I thought the MFil was quite jarring despite the open pattern.

I wouldn't be surprised if they have very different layups.

 

[logansc]

Personally, I thought the MF200 played very differently to the TF320, much harsher than the flex rating suggests. I thought the MFil was quite jarring despite the open pattern.

I wouldn't be surprised if they have very different layups.

That's an interesting take, as the TW description says its more forgiving and plays flexier than 64. What was yours strung with?

 

[nyc]

some gamma demo string - it was a demo from TW I played with.

 

[logansc]

some gamma demo string - it was a demo from TW I played with.

Oh ok, well thanks for the feeback. What did you think of the TF 320?

 

[SteveI]

It appears to me these racquets come from identical molds. Outside of differences in weight and balance, they all list at a 64 flex, beam size and head size do they all essentially feel the same as far as frame response? I know the string pattern will make a difference but I'm specifically talking about the 16x20 TF 320 with the MF200+ and the Type II NX One. Thoughts? Feedback?

Hi,

Have played them all. The NX1 is a much stiffer frame playes more like 68. The TF and the 200+ play like 62. Maybe the molds look the same, but the do not play the same IMHO.

Steve

 

[logansc]

Hi,

Have played them all. The NX1 is a much stiffer frame playes more like 68. The TF and the 200+ play like 62. Maybe the molds look the same, but the do not play the same IMHO.

Steve

So out of the TF320 and the 200+ which would you reccommend, as far as performance vs. price?

 

[meowmix]

disregard my post

 

[nyc]

the tf320 has been my main stick for over a year. I personally preferred the tf, but I'd demo both.

 

[SteveI]

So out of the TF320 and the 200+ which would you reccommend, as far as performance vs. price?

Dunlop 200+ is a great frame.. low price or not. I would go with the Dunlop.

If I had all the money in the world... the TF.

Steve

 

[logansc]

Dunlop 200+ is a great frame.. low price or not. I would go with the Dunlop.

If I had all the money in the world... the TF.

Steve

That's what I was pretty much asking, if they play so much alike minus the half ounce of weight difference might as well get the dunlop and add some lead.