In the thread best serve volley racquets the six one 95s was mentioned a number of times.
Gino said:
Backhanded Compliment said:
yeah that 6.1 and microgel radical are legit for any such list
I thought maybe I'll put this question up in the 95s user thread aswell.
My confusion is as follows:
1.
In numerous threads there is talk about racquet customization, adding weight to the racquet to make it more stable and give it more plow through. People always mention they love heavy high SW frames for serve and volley. But the 6.1 95s is (relatively) light.
Now you could argue that it is a good platform racquet for serve and volley, but if you look in the '6.1 95s fan club' thread everyone mentions they mention it is PERFECT in stock form and needs no added weight.
Why is that?
(possible reasons could be that the fan club loves the stick that much because it is their preferred spec but I am unsure, would a heavy racquet guy be better off with a stock or customized tot 330 sw 95s)
2.
A different dilemma. People always say: if you serve and volley, the best string choice is a hybrid (for feel and touch). That could be a gut/poly hybrid or poly/multi hybrid.
On the contrary, in the '6.1 95s fan club thread' it is mentioned numerous times and noone dissagreed; that the only string you should play in this frame is full poly (due to spin snapback and breakage).
What is your opinion on this, 6.1 95s for volleying, full poly or no?
Seeing I own a 6.1 95s aswell I was very interested to find out how other people think about these 'confusions'.
What would be your perfect spec / string setup if using the 6 1 95 s.