christos_liaskos
Professional
Last Sunday we had the Sports Personality of the Year Awards in the UK. It is mostly awards for sports people from the UK but one award is called the "Overseas Sports Personlaity....". The nominees for it were Federer and Usain Bolt.
I dont want to debate who achieved more and who 'dominated' their sports the most the year though - that is essential what the award is supposed to be for, of course some will agree with the decision and some wont. I am asking another question however.......
If you assume that both people have exactly the same level of achievements and domination, I wondered how you could separate the two. This made me wonder which kind of sport achieves the highest level of performance? Is it a sport like running, where you compete to the best of your ability but essentially you cant be affected by your opponents performance and vice-versa. Or is it a sport like tennis where the level you reach or can reach will depend on your opponent? MacEnroe said he was sad when Borg retired because he felt that their rivalry brought out the best in each other and they could push the limits of their abilities even more. You have the same situation with Roger and Rafa.
So the motivation of being the best you can be, in Usain Bolt's case it has to come from within, to push himself to be the best he can be, regardless of his opponents. In Roger's case though do you argue he is now being pushed by his opponents to reach amazing levels of perfomance or, as a lot of people say for the first few years of his domination, does his level of perfomance not have to be that high because the opposition is not competetive enough.
I know there isn't really a proper answer to this question but let's hear your oppinions and theories if anyone has any.....
I dont want to debate who achieved more and who 'dominated' their sports the most the year though - that is essential what the award is supposed to be for, of course some will agree with the decision and some wont. I am asking another question however.......
If you assume that both people have exactly the same level of achievements and domination, I wondered how you could separate the two. This made me wonder which kind of sport achieves the highest level of performance? Is it a sport like running, where you compete to the best of your ability but essentially you cant be affected by your opponents performance and vice-versa. Or is it a sport like tennis where the level you reach or can reach will depend on your opponent? MacEnroe said he was sad when Borg retired because he felt that their rivalry brought out the best in each other and they could push the limits of their abilities even more. You have the same situation with Roger and Rafa.
So the motivation of being the best you can be, in Usain Bolt's case it has to come from within, to push himself to be the best he can be, regardless of his opponents. In Roger's case though do you argue he is now being pushed by his opponents to reach amazing levels of perfomance or, as a lot of people say for the first few years of his domination, does his level of perfomance not have to be that high because the opposition is not competetive enough.
I know there isn't really a proper answer to this question but let's hear your oppinions and theories if anyone has any.....