2021 competition for the CYGS.Depends on the competition
2021 competition.
Depends on the timing and the player.Let's say a player wins only four tournaments during the year, but they are all slams, how does this compare with Fed 2006 season?
Would you consider Rublev in a year winning only titles 250/500 level (he was injured during slams and masters so he skipped) with 100+ wins/0 loses a dominant season?The CYGS should be greater, but 2006/2015 were the more dominant seasons if that makes sense at all.
In fact purely as an accomplishment Novak’s 2021 so far, given that he’s 34, is on par and possibly greater than 2006. Both had 3 slams but Novak is much older. And before we hear yet again the weak era arguments at 34 Fed was nowhere near winning as many slams.
Better to replace Fed 2006 with Djokervic 2011Let's say a player wins only four tournaments during the year, but they are all slams, how does this compare with Fed 2006 season?
To be clear I'm not comparing levels, I'm comparing accomplishments. I don't think we can compare levels across time, but to each their own.2015 Federer better at Wimbledon, 2021 Djokovic better at AO and RG.
Djokovic will have to play some great tennis at USO to get ahead of 2015 USO Federer.
And LOL at posters voting for 2006. Clearly TTW is meant just for trolling.
No.Would you consider Rublev in a year winning only titles 250/500 level (he was injured during slams and masters so he skipped) with 100+ wins/0 loses a dominant season?
I choose Fed so it is not a Djokovic centric discussion. The idea is just a great season vs 4 slams.Better to replace Fed 2006 with Djokervic 2011
Fed 2006 is a superior player to Djokovic 2011
Djokovic 2011 cannot win at the W+USO vs Fed 2006, on clay Fed would still win over Novak but Novak 2011 fares better vs Rafa than Fed 06 and at the AO Djokovic 2011 would win their encounter.
This is bulls**t! Federer's opponents in 2006 were much weaker than Djokervic 2011, not at the same level as 2011. In 2006 Federer did not even get any opponents as good as peak Murray. And, Djokervic is 11-1 versus Nadal and Federer in 2011.
Federer's 2006 is also much weaker than Djokervic's 2015, when he won 12 big titles and reached every finals.
The results of the poll show that for some people 5 > 10.So winning 4 slams in the same year is not a great season? This poll is like asking is $10M more than $5M.
They are just trolling. Not a single one of them would vote that way for their preferred playerThe results of the poll show that for some people 5 > 10.
That stat is just absurd.This is bulls**t! Federer's opponents in 2006 were much weaker than Djokervic 2011, not at the same level as 2011. In 2006 Federer did not even get any opponents as good as peak Murray. And, Djokervic is 11-1 versus Nadal and Federer in 2011.
Federer's 2006 is also much weaker than Djokervic's 2015, when he won 12 big titles and reached every finals.
He was 15 GS wins away from CYGS.Well, a hard question, and it depends a bit on what you are asking - Fed's 2006 was amazing, and he was only one match away from winning the CYGS. If he had faced anyone but Nadal at RG, then I believe he would have won it. So should we take the level of competition into account also?
In terms of prestige and legacy, I'm going to go with the CYGS. It's such a unique feat, and has been so elusive for so many top players, that to achieve it would be extremely special.
HahahahaFed 2006 is a superior player to Djokovic 2011
Djokovic 2011 cannot win at the W+USO vs Fed 2006, on clay Fed would still win over Novak but Novak 2011 fares better vs Rafa than Fed 06 and at the AO Djokovic 2011 would win their encounter.
2006 peak Rafa LOLPosters who voted 2006 have witnessed epic super heavyweight high octane fights in full speed between Peak Rafa and Peak Federer in 06-09 period, they value that over the medvedev-tsitsi-berretini garbage that Novak is dishing out to them now, can't help it.
Quality matters, not quantity.
No it is not.1969 is still regarded as the best open era season.
How many posters know anything about Laver's 1969 apart from the CYGS?
Peak level is unmeasurable poetic mumbo-jumbo category, expression of personal bias with zero objective truth in it.Doesn't matter who is the opponent, Federer was Superman in 2006, his level was higher.
Federer owns Djokovic in peak level gaming, it is not even close.
Your hero was getting spanked at the hands of Federer's pigeons Murray and Stan in his own peak which is shameful.
2006 peak Rafa LOL
Well, a hard question, and it depends a bit on what you are asking - Fed's 2006 was amazing, and he was only one match away from winning the CYGS.
This is bulls**t! Federer's opponents in 2006 were much weaker than Djokervic 2011, not at the same level as 2011. In 2006 Federer did not even get any opponents as good as peak Murray. And, Djokervic is 11-1 versus Nadal and Federer in 2011.
Federer's 2006 is also much weaker than Djokervic's 2015, when he won 12 big titles and reached every finals.
1969 is still regarded as the best open era season.
Federer in 2006 was the apogee of tennis.
[/QUOTE
Nadal owned Fed in 2006 - played 5 finals and Rafa won 4, including on hardcourt.
1969 is still regarded as the best open era season.
How many posters know anything about Laver's 1969 apart from the CYGS?
Nadal owned Fed in 2006 - played 5 finals and Rafa won 4, including on hardcourt.
2006 peak Rafa LOL
I do. + I know why his 1969 is below 2015 and 2006 in terms of greatness.