R
rnrockz1
Guest
^^^^^^^^^^^
Karlovic's serve is way overrated.
lol
Karlovic: Service Games won: 92%
Average 1st serve speed: over 130
#2 in # of aces hit in a season; Goran was higher only because courts are faster
Only failed to hit an ace in a match once
Fastest 2nd serve Record Holder (144 mph)
Fastest 1st serve ever: 153 mph (out wide, too)
Karlovic's serve is way overrated.
Who cares about the facts when it comes to serves..his serve is overated- if Federer can break him but he cant break Roddick then there's a problem..
Who cares about the facts when it comes to serves..his serve is overated- if Federer can break him but he cant break Roddick then there's a problem..
lol
Karlovic: Service Games won: 92% - Almost all people capable of breaking him even once are in the top 10.
Average 1st serve speed: over 130
#2 in # of aces hit in a season; Goran was higher only because courts are faster
Only failed to hit an ace in a match once
Fastest 2nd serve Record Holder (144 mph)
Fastest 1st serve ever: 153 mph (out wide, too)
In addition Karlovic saves 70% of his break points (also #1 in ATP).
Not overrated at all.
Your only thinking wimby 09...Who cares about the facts when it comes to serves..his serve is overated- if Federer can break him but he cant break Roddick then there's a problem..
How is his serve overrated? For the record even Federer usually beats him in straight sets, but he rarely breaks him.
Who cares about the facts? I do... You should too. For example, there could be a player who serves over 9000 mph every time, hits 100% first serves in, and aces every time... Yet you could brush aside these, saying "Who cares about the facts?" and say Nadal's serve is better.
You could, but you'd be wrong. I believe you're wrong in this case as well.
Actually, you're right- and btw Nadal's serve is better lol
I have to respectfully disagree. The angles Karlovic creates on his serve are sick. His ground game is terrible, probably not even top 1000, yet he wins 92-93% of his service games.
I believe he's won something like 90% of his service games against top 20 players. Federer had broken him 13 times in all of their meetings (I believe they've met 10-11 times.)
Ivo's serve statistics are severely padded. Look at his stats from this year and his stats against lesser oponents vs higher ranked opponents.
Just to give an example of what I'm talking about look at his number vs Mahut (ranked 146) at The Queens Club Tourney this year.
Aces
19 1
Double Faults
01
1st Serve
61% (37/60) 74% (43/5 8
1st Serve Points Won
75% (28/37)67% (29/43)
2nd Serve Points Won
65% (15/23)46% (7/15)
Break Points Saved
100% (2/2)66% (4/6)
Service Games Played
109
Now look at the very next match vs, Roddick (ranked 6)
Statistics on Service
Aces
26 24
Double Faults
02
1st Serve
71% (53/74) 77% (56/72)
1st Serve Points Won
90% (48/53) 89% (50/56)
2nd Serve Points Won
57% (12/21) 68% (11/16)
Break Points Saved
100% (2/2) 0% (0/0)
Service Games Played
1212
Ivo's serve statistics are severely padded. Look at his stats from this year and his stats against lesser oponents vs higher ranked opponents.
Just to give an example of what I'm talking about look at his number vs Mahut (ranked 146) at The Queens Club Tourney this year.
Aces
19 1
Double Faults
01
1st Serve
61% (37/60) 74% (43/5 8
1st Serve Points Won
75% (28/37)67% (29/43)
2nd Serve Points Won
65% (15/23)46% (7/15)
Break Points Saved
100% (2/2)66% (4/6)
Service Games Played
109
Now look at the very next match vs, Roddick (ranked 6)
Statistics on Service
Aces
26 24
Double Faults
02
1st Serve
71% (53/74) 77% (56/72)
1st Serve Points Won
90% (48/53) 89% (50/56)
2nd Serve Points Won
57% (12/21) 68% (11/16)
Break Points Saved
100% (2/2) 0% (0/0)
Service Games Played
1212
Neither Mahut nor Roddick broke him...
But I don't understand the last stat. Service games played??? I'm pretty sure he hit more than 74 1st serves in 1212 service games.
12 services games for IVO, 12 for Roddick.
Point being is, his statistics are padded. He absolutely dominates the guys so much who are ranked lower than him, that by the time he plays a "top 10" and loses, it doesn't matter because he leads tournament in every category.
If his serve was really as good as you all say it is, he would do better when playing better opponents, and he doesn''t.
12 services games for IVO, 12 for Roddick.
Point being is, his statistics are padded. He absolutely dominates the guys so much who are ranked lower than him, that by the time he plays a "top 10" and loses, it doesn't matter because he leads tournament in every category.
If his serve was really as good as you all say it is, he would do better when playing better opponents, and he doesn''t.
Ivo's serve statistics are severely padded. Look at his stats from this year and his stats against lesser oponents vs higher ranked opponents.
Just to give an example of what I'm talking about look at his number vs Mahut (ranked 146) at The Queens Club Tourney this year.
Aces
19 1
Double Faults
01
1st Serve
61% (37/60) 74% (43/5 8
1st Serve Points Won
75% (28/37)67% (29/43)
2nd Serve Points Won
65% (15/23)46% (7/15)
Break Points Saved
100% (2/2)66% (4/6)
Service Games Played
109
Now look at the very next match vs, Roddick (ranked 6)
Statistics on Service
Aces
26 24
Double Faults
02
1st Serve
71% (53/74) 77% (56/72)
1st Serve Points Won
90% (48/53) 89% (50/56)
2nd Serve Points Won
57% (12/21) 68% (11/16)
Break Points Saved
100% (2/2) 0% (0/0)
Service Games Played
1212
It's whose, not who's.
Ivo's serve is not that effective I think because he has a horrible TB record.
Ivo's serve is not that effective I think because he has a horrible TB record.
Wait... what? He lost because he lost the tiebreak. I'm only talking about his serve, not his all-round game. His serve was not broken by Roddick or Mahut. He dominates everyone with his service games, however the higher ranked players are able to take the tiebreaks, and maybe occasionally even break Karlovic.
and if you look at the roddick match, roddicks serve was more effective. Just look at the stats.
What I'm trying to explain is that although he has great numbers, they are in part "great" because of the competition the numbers are taken from. he does so incredibly well against lower ranked guys, that once he plays his first tough opponent and loses, his numbers are not skewed. In other words, if he were to continue winning through the tournament, and get deeper in the draw, he would undoubtedly get "broken more", because of the better players he is facing. Alas, we will never know because he immediately loses when he hits the top 10 guys.
Correcting a native English speaker, shame on you.
His career TB record is 164-160. Seeing as his singles record is 159-142, what would you expect?
For a guy with an amazing serve he has a horrible TB record.
Well not really, IMO. Maybe he's a little worse than expected. However if you win 90-92% of your service games but only win 11-12% of your return games, that's not much of a net gain.
Karlovic is exposed due to his weaker second serve. He's probably got the best first serve, but his second serve is the one serve that gets really exposed. I think Roddick, Guccione, and a plethora of guys have a better second serve.
I agree with you there. Although I would say his first serve is so much better than the rest of the field that (wins 85% of his 1st serve points, next best is 79%) that it compensates quite well for his second serve (which isn't at all bad.)
Sure, but that's only one example. Karlovic holds over 90% of the time against top 20 players this year.
His second serve isn't bad, but he doesn't do enough with it.
Reminder: Karlovic has beaten Federer...
Top 10 he has played this year.
Federer three times, Davydenko, Roddick twice , Tsonga, Verdasco. That's it. 8 matches the whole year.
Fed at Indian wells broke him once.
Davydenko at Monte Carlo broke him 4 times.
Federer at Rome broken him twice.
Federer at Wimbledon broken twice.
Tsonga and Verdaco were unable to break him and lost their matches.
Again, if you start looking closer at matches against the top guys, which he doesn’t play very frequently, his numbers are no where near the same as they are against the rest of the field. They are padded.
and if you look at the roddick match, roddicks serve was more effective. Just look at the stats.
What I'm trying to explain is that although he has great numbers, they are in part "great" because of the competition the numbers are taken from. he does so incredibly well against lower ranked guys, that once he plays his first tough opponent and loses, his numbers are not skewed. In other words, if he were to continue winning through the tournament, and get deeper in the draw, he would undoubtedly get "broken more", because of the better players he is facing. Alas, we will never know because he immediately loses when he hits the top 10 guys.
Federer makes Karlovic's serve look like a joke. Same with ROddick.
Federer makes Karlovic's serve look like a joke. Same with ROddick.
It shouldn't be too hard to understand...
Is Federer a better player than Karlovic? Anybody in the world would tell you yes.
But is Federer's 1st serve better than Karlovic's 1st serve? No. In fact, Federer's 2nd serve is not better than Karlovic's 2nd serve. The reason Federer does not get broken very often (although he gets broken more often than Karlovic does), because he has an amazing all-around game to support his service game.
Karlovic holds more than 90% of the time against top 10 players.
Yes, but Karlovic's 1st serve, when compared side-to-side with Federer's or even Roddick's 1st serve, is just a bigger weapon. Federer is able to neutralize that weapon's advantage somewhat because he is a great returner, but still rarely breaks Karlovic.
Federer has broken Karlovic about 10% of the time in their 11 matches.